IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Re. 'lying'
If.. the first casualty of war is truth, then life in a Warfare State is guaranteed to afford precious little 'truth' -- and assuredly none of that! from any side's Official Sources. CYA is the universal Religion, just after - the accumulation of $.

So then - believe every 'journalist's extrapolation of an event, via 10 minutes spent talking to survivors?

(My solution is - I know that I will *not* hear anything approaching truth -during- and very little after. Those who imagine, just now, that they are well-enough informed: are either very wise and well-connected OR they are fantasizing.)

The only general Rule I find I can rely upon in every event: where homo-sap and his mouth are involved, Shit Will Happen, but half will say that it smells like a rose.


Ashton
New There is ONE way to "know".
The side with nothing to fear from public disclosure will/would/should allow reporters to follow along after the combat troops.

Wasn't Wolf in a hotel in Bagdad during the initial attack on Iraq? Filming. Recording.
     Please, tell me this isn't true. - (pwhysall) - (39)
         I've never been in the army... - (Arkadiy)
         Its true - (boxley) - (19)
             Left? - (pwhysall) - (1)
                 Same place people in london went during the blitz - (boxley)
             But why lie about it then? - (Brandioch) - (13)
                 You can't let the Red Cross into a combat zone - (rsf) - (12)
                     Only once. - (Brandioch) - (11)
                         I'll spell it out for you - (rsf) - (10)
                             Try spelling it out again. - (Brandioch) - (9)
                                 I can't comment beyond this post - (rsf)
                                 Intention does matter - (3)) - (7)
                                     Yep. - (Brandioch) - (6)
                                         Actually, he's got a point. - (inthane-chan) - (5)
                                             Drones aren't the technology we need... - (hnick) - (4)
                                                 Exactly! 'Fair Witness' is dead-on. But WHO amongst us ??? -NT - (Ashton) - (3)
                                                     Ah, but drones are just the start... - (inthane-chan)
                                                     Doesn't matter... wouldn't work - (hnick) - (1)
                                                         An important minority* would value them, but - (Ashton)
             Heh. - (mmoffitt) - (2)
                 At this point in time..... - (Brandioch)
                 My guess? Not many, maybe none. - (3))
         It isn't - (3)) - (5)
             Yep, they sure did. - (SpiceWare) - (2)
                 Interesting article. - (Brandioch) - (1)
                     It is on the Editorial/Opinions page -NT - (SpiceWare)
             Re. 'lying' - (Ashton) - (1)
                 There is ONE way to "know". - (Brandioch)
         It is not - (bluke) - (11)
             Fascinating. - (Brandioch) - (10)
                 There you go again - (wharris2) - (7)
                     I'm just reading the articles. - (Brandioch) - (6)
                         Ah, so Israel should just lay back and let bombers in. - (wharris2) - (5)
                             So, "reporters" == "bombers" to you? Fascinating. - (Brandioch) - (4)
                                 So Reporters==evidence? - (boxley) - (3)
                                     Reporters == evidence. - (Brandioch) - (2)
                                         flesh not rope :) -NT - (boxley) - (1)
                                             TMI - (Brandioch)
                 That is the word. - (static) - (1)
                     It's a nasty bit of business, killing. - (Brandioch)

The last time he socialized with us, he got flamed like a mosquito in a bug zapper.
385 ms