I guess that's better than binary blobs.
And I am *so* glad the previous developers at work never thought of that.
I'm still cleaning up from someone's fixation with TEXT fields. And then there's still a few FLOATs lurking around carrying currency. And Unix timestamps instead of DATETIME. Or in one case, instead of just DATE. Wade. Just Add Story http://justaddstory.wordpress.com/
|
XML question on "disapble-output-escaping"
- (drook)
- (18)
- March 7, 2012, 10:44:01 AM EST
Re: XML question on "disapble-output-escaping"
- (mvitale)
- (15)
- March 7, 2012, 07:53:03 PM EST
Uhh ... not getting what you're saying
-NT
- (drook)
- (2)
- March 7, 2012, 05:43:22 PM EST
He's having the inverse problem ;-)
- (scoenye)
- March 7, 2012, 06:34:09 PM EST
Check again. Sorry.
-NT
- (mvitale)
- March 7, 2012, 07:53:15 PM EST
That's (kind of) what I'm thinking
- (drook)
- (11)
- March 7, 2012, 09:38:49 PM EST
Not nearly that simple.
- (static)
- (10)
- March 7, 2012, 09:52:04 PM EST
Yeah, not at all ... well, maybe it is
- (drook)
- (9)
- March 7, 2012, 10:13:59 PM EST
Ah...
- (static)
- (8)
- March 7, 2012, 11:27:49 PM EST
It's legal? Well crap, this argument just got a lot harder
- (drook)
- (7)
- March 7, 2012, 11:57:48 PM EST
"Into the database"?
- (static)
- (6)
- March 8, 2012, 04:26:33 AM EST
Umm ... yeah
- (drook)
- (5)
- March 8, 2012, 09:27:36 AM EST
? Its been a few years since I went to xml dtd school
- (boxley)
- (4)
- March 8, 2012, 09:56:35 AM EST
It's not a string
- (drook)
- (3)
- March 8, 2012, 10:33:16 AM EST
not my point
- (boxley)
- (2)
- March 8, 2012, 12:07:02 PM EST
Well ...
- (drook)
- (1)
- March 8, 2012, 12:50:17 PM EST
I guess that's better than binary blobs.
- (static)
- March 8, 2012, 03:41:14 PM EST
Based on the first line and the rest of the thread
- (scoenye)
- (1)
- March 8, 2012, 07:51:11 AM EST
That's a good point
- (drook)
- March 8, 2012, 09:28:56 AM EST