IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Sound bite simplicity.
It's obviously not what he was attempting to convey. He was saying that there is a system to help and he thinks it works. This is a cheap attempt to put different meanings to his words. He's a useless toad and shouldn't be elected dog catcher, but this was pretty blatant. He does enough stupid stuff that it shouldn't be manufactured by others. It just makes the antagonists look bad.
New transcript from CNN

ROMNEY: This is a time people are worried. They're frightened. They want someone who they have confidence in. And I believe I will be able to instill that confidence in the American people. And, by the way, I'm in this race because I care about Americans. I'm not concerned about the very poor. We have a safety net there. If it needs repair, I'll fix it.

I'm not concerned about the very rich, they're doing just fine. I'm concerned about the very heart of the America, the 90, 95 percent of Americans who right now are struggling and I'll continue to take that message across the nation.

O'BRIEN: All right. So I know I said last question, but I've got to ask you. You just said I'm not concerned about the very poor because they have a safety net. And I think there are lots of very poor Americans who are struggling who would say that sounds odd. Can you explain that?

ROMNEY: Well, you had to finish the sentence, Soledad. I said I'm not concerned about the very poor that have the safety net, but if it has holes in it, I will repair them.

O'BRIEN: Got it. OK.

ROMNEY: The - the challenge right now - we will hear from the Democrat Party the plight of the poor, and - and there's no question, it's not good being poor and we have a safety net to help those that are very poor.

But my campaign is focused on middle income Americans. My campaign - you can choose where to focus. You can focus on the rich. That's not my focus. You can focus on the very poor. That's not my focus.



http://transcripts.c...202/01/sp.01.html


He was given a chance to fill in the hole he just dug for himself. Instead, he just kept making it deeper.




"Chicago to my mind was the only place to be. ... I above all liked the city because it was filled with people all a-bustle, and the clatter of hooves and carriages, and with delivery wagons and drays and peddlers and the boom and clank of freight trains. And when those black clouds came sailing in from the west, pouring thunderstorms upon us so that you couldn't hear the cries or curses of humankind, I liked that best of all. Chicago could stand up to the worst God had to offer. I understood why it was built--a place for trade, of course, with railroads and ships and so on, but mostly to give all of us a magnitude of defiance that is not provided by one house on the plains. And the plains is where those storms come from."

-- E.L. Doctorow
New You give him too much credit.
It was a dog-whistle (which is a misnomer since just about everyone can hear it).

http://www.boomantri...2/2/1/113316/4508

Mitt Romney committed another gaffe this morning while he was talking to Soledad O'Brien of CNN. Now, some people are going to say that he's being taken out of context, but I want to focus on the first one and a half sentences. Here's how he started:

"By the way, I'm in this race because I care about Americans. I'm not concerned about the very poor..." -Mitt Romney, February 1st, 2012


What's the logical implication of that juxtaposition? What does that tell you about how Mitt Romney's mind works? He cares about Americans, not the very poor. To me, that was the most damning part of the whole thing. I think he realized that what he had said didn't sound right, so he continued on to say he was not concerned about the very rich, either.

But the logic of his argument didn't improve.

[...]


Boo is right - the juxtaposition is revealing. Unless he was running on fumes from lack of sleep (and he didn't seem to be), it seems to be exactly what he wanted to say. Especially since he basically repeated the same thing when he was asked about it again in the same interview.

He's trying to divide the middle from the poor, to distract them from (among other things) his wealth, over-seas tax shelters, and low tax rates. It's a calculated strategy.

My $0.02.

Cheers,
Scott.
New Um... Ok. Certainly possible.
I've been trying to work on my general outlook and this is probably not the place to start...
:-/
Edit: Gail Collins of the NYT seems to share your view. Ok, screw the Pollyanna bit. Let there be unbridled cynicism!
Expand Edited by hnick Feb. 2, 2012, 07:36:03 AM EST
New GMTA.
I was just about to post Gail's piece. In fact, here it is:

http://www.nytimes.c...speaks-oh-no.html

:-)

Of course, she's paid to write a column that often feeds controversies, so she might not be an unbiased observer. That said, I think she nails it.

Cheers,
Scott.
New I read it as an attempt to "be" the 95%
The "poor" aren't voting for him.

The top X% (who the fuck knows the exact numbers, but you understand) will vote for him even when he says he does not care about them. They KNOW better.

So, he needs to get everyone in the middle who does not think they are poor to think he will give them more (or let them keep more, depending on your point of view), not taking their stuff away and giving it to the leaches on the bottom.

He's gunning for Box. Actually, no, Box doesn't mind the "true" poor getting his money, just that Box has the ability to live on shit that will make a billy goat puke (Box == Rambo, yes), so he expects everyone else to as well, at least if he is paying for it.

But that 5-30% "underclass"? F'em. Let'em suffer a bit and work harder to avoid the suffering. Incentives. That seems to be the direction.

So anyway, Romney wants that middle ground since they MIGHT vote for him, and they are antagonistic to the next level down.
     Romney: 'I'm not concerned about the very poor' - (lincoln) - (6)
         Sound bite simplicity. - (hnick) - (5)
             transcript from CNN - (lincoln)
             You give him too much credit. - (Another Scott) - (3)
                 Um... Ok. Certainly possible. - (hnick) - (2)
                     GMTA. - (Another Scott)
                     I read it as an attempt to "be" the 95% - (crazy)

30,000 pounds.... of bananas!
131 ms