never EVER claimed it was about saving taxpayer money

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #353,080 by boxley 1/12/12 6:01:08 PM Reply	never EVER claimed it was about saving taxpayer money it was fuckem, they got $2k buy yer own groceries. Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 55 years. meep
Post #353,084 by Another Scott 1/12/12 6:39:29 PM Reply	Even if that $2k is in a 2nd car they need. Hmm...
Post #353,086 by boxley 1/12/12 6:47:54 PM Reply	nice word placement there bucky Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 55 years. meep
Post #353,087 by hnick 1/12/12 6:58:23 PM Reply	Please don't feed the troll He's just glorying in being a callous, nihilistic shit with the possibility it will annoy others. Please don't feed the troll.
Post #353,089 by Another Scott 1/12/12 7:17:23 PM Reply	Post more often then! I need someone to argue with here :-)
Post #353,122 by crazy 1/13/12 9:45:22 AM 1/13/12 9:46:30 AM Reply	Nope 1 car is a requirement for most families (job, school, etc). 2nd is a luxury. I spent a long time living in the burbs with a wife and 2 kids and 1 car. I did NOT enjoy it, but we got by, and cars do not have economy of scale. 2nd car costs just as much if not more. But a single car makes you work out your life a bit more in advance, which also means gas savings. Edit: This was supposed to be a reply to: "Even if that $2k is in a 2nd car they need. Hmm... " Edited by crazy Jan. 13, 2012, 09:46:30 AM EST Expand All History

Republican "compassion" at its finest - (lincoln) - (36) - Jan. 11, 2012, 08:09:53 PM EST

you got 2k cash and want me to buy your food? - (boxley) - (21) - Jan. 11, 2012, 10:49:44 PM EST

"... or other assets..." -NT - (Another Scott) - (1) - Jan. 11, 2012, 10:52:49 PM EST

This just means... - (folkert) - Jan. 11, 2012, 11:29:17 PM EST

let's see how well you survive - (lincoln) - (18) - Jan. 12, 2012, 08:48:28 AM EST

I have not been unemployed for a while - (boxley) - (17) - Jan. 12, 2012, 09:26:08 AM EST

Yeah, why let people get benefits their taxes paid for. -NT - (Another Scott) - (16) - Jan. 12, 2012, 09:36:46 AM EST

Re: Yeah, why let people get benefits *MY* taxes paid for. - (folkert) - (15) - Jan. 12, 2012, 11:32:46 AM EST

Yeah, only land owners should be able to vote, also too. -NT - (Another Scott) - Jan. 12, 2012, 11:36:35 AM EST

Was that an assumption that those getting any - (crazy) - (13) - Jan. 12, 2012, 12:13:11 PM EST

foodstamps for a family of 4 who has a single earner - (boxley) - (12) - Jan. 12, 2012, 01:53:52 PM EST

Is a car an "asset" in this case? - (Another Scott) - (11) - Jan. 12, 2012, 02:15:36 PM EST

My first thought was houses, not cars - (S1mon_Jester) - Jan. 12, 2012, 02:20:42 PM EST

is a car a liquid asset? Not really -NT - (boxley) - (9) - Jan. 12, 2012, 02:56:48 PM EST

lincoln's quote excerpt doesn't say "liquid". - (Another Scott) - (8) - Jan. 12, 2012, 03:05:05 PM EST

from your link - (boxley) - (7) - Jan. 12, 2012, 04:34:27 PM EST

Hmm... - (Another Scott) - (6) - Jan. 12, 2012, 04:54:51 PM EST

never EVER claimed it was about saving taxpayer money - (boxley) - (5) - Jan. 12, 2012, 06:01:08 PM EST

Even if that $2k is in a 2nd car they need. Hmm... -NT - (Another Scott) - (4) - Jan. 12, 2012, 06:39:29 PM EST

nice word placement there bucky -NT - (boxley) - Jan. 12, 2012, 06:47:54 PM EST

Please don't feed the troll - (hnick) - (1) - Jan. 12, 2012, 06:58:23 PM EST

Post more often then! I need someone to argue with here :-) -NT - (Another Scott) - Jan. 12, 2012, 07:17:23 PM EST

Nope - (crazy) - Jan. 13, 2012, 09:46:30 AM EST

Latest example of the policy... - (Another Scott) - (13) - April 6, 2012, 01:10:41 PM EDT

Whats wrong with the policy? - (boxley) - (5) - April 6, 2012, 01:21:33 PM EDT

It makes no sense. - (Another Scott) - (4) - April 6, 2012, 01:40:56 PM EDT

if you think owning a house car and 3k in the bank - (boxley) - (3) - April 6, 2012, 03:16:33 PM EDT

Read the story again. - (Another Scott) - (2) - April 6, 2012, 03:33:33 PM EDT

again you claim house car and 3k is poverty, hardly -NT - (boxley) - (1) - April 6, 2012, 05:15:48 PM EDT

... -NT - (Another Scott) - April 6, 2012, 05:48:22 PM EDT

Charlie's take. - (Another Scott) - (3) - April 6, 2012, 07:50:36 PM EDT

yup love me that obamacare - (boxley) - (2) - April 6, 2012, 08:29:30 PM EDT

Re: yup love me that obamacare - (lincoln) - (1) - April 7, 2012, 02:12:10 PM EDT

own, not rent from a bank. -NT - (boxley) - April 7, 2012, 02:56:42 PM EDT

Re: Latest example of the policy... - (pwhysall) - (2) - April 7, 2012, 01:00:10 AM EDT

Cold war propeganda. - (Andrew Grygus) - April 7, 2012, 01:07:58 AM EDT

We aren't opposed. We're just stupid. - (mmoffitt) - April 9, 2012, 09:10:58 AM EDT

iwethey.org

*pssst* Wanna buy a watch?
180 ms