IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Money, Financials, and Economics Forum / Okay, you win
Post #351,430
by drook
Picture of drook
11/28/11 10:50:48 PM
Reply
New Okay, you win
You're willing to move the goalposts more than I'm willing to chase them.
--

Drew
Post #351,431
by beepster
11/28/11 11:02:33 PM
Reply
New I didn't move anything
you said that "everyone is saying it" and so it needed a column. Turns out, no one is currently saying it. Bother for you.
Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
Post #351,433
by drook
Picture of drook
11/29/11 4:12:31 AM
Reply
New Yes, "everyone", that's just what I said
--

Drew
Post #351,439
by beepster
11/29/11 8:06:45 AM
Reply
New ok, nit correction
people I support, with the direct assumption that those would be Republicans. Believe follow on included members of Congress.

If you show me 3 quotes from within the last month from candidates (R or D) or congressmen mentioning dividends being double taxed, I'll concede. Otherwise...
Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
Post #351,442
by folkert
Picture of folkert
11/29/11 8:36:25 AM
11/29/11 8:39:35 AM
Reply
New This enough?
http://abcnews.go.co...ght-on-substance/

http://www.decodedsc...sals-decoded/5519

http://online.wsj.co...560162304238.html

There was only 5900 articles in the last month regarding this. Searching in News for the last month and for the following:

"Double Taxation" Republican Candidate
Expand Edited by folkert Nov. 29, 2011, 08:39:35 AM EST
Expand All History
Post #351,443
by beepster
11/29/11 8:50:32 AM
Reply
New Nope...reason
First one is on Cain's plan and the critique of it.

Second one I'm inclined to grant credit for, though it does not contain a quote of Newt saying this.

Third is about elimination of tax on repatriated earnings...which is double taxation and keeps capital out of the country.
Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
Post #351,457
by folkert
Picture of folkert
11/29/11 12:52:16 PM
Reply
New I just picked the first three that came up...
Seriously there was over 5900 *unique* articles, you expect me to go through even a hundred to gather things up for you to refute your mantra?

Sorry Beep... you can do your own work.
Post #351,481
by beepster
11/29/11 5:24:19 PM
11/29/11 5:24:46 PM
Reply
New You were doing drooks work, not mine
Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
Expand Edited by beepster Nov. 29, 2011, 05:24:46 PM EST
Expand All History
Post #351,447
by boxley
11/29/11 11:26:58 AM
Reply
New how about something not written by the attack left?
the first link contains so many inaccuracies it could have been written by the whitehouse
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 55 years. meep
Post #351,451
by beepster
11/29/11 12:30:14 PM
Reply
New Re: how about something not written by the attack left?
The first one isn't even about the subject at hand...its about the layering of taxes that is supposed to happen under Cain's 9-9-9 plan. Has nothing to do with investment taxes and/or repatriation taxes.
Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
     Dean Baker on corporate taxes. - (Another Scott) - (32) - Nov. 27, 2011, 03:09:01 PM EST
         why would it be anything else? - (boxley) - Nov. 27, 2011, 03:43:53 PM EST
         Interesting? Not very... - (beepster) - (28) - Nov. 27, 2011, 06:56:09 PM EST
             So that argument *doesn't* keep coming up? - (drook) - (27) - Nov. 28, 2011, 10:11:35 AM EST
                 what makes you think that class understands incorporation? -NT - (boxley) - Nov. 28, 2011, 10:12:32 AM EST
                 Re: So that argument *doesn't* keep coming up? - (beepster) - (25) - Nov. 28, 2011, 11:02:09 AM EST
                     Ahh, got it - (drook) - (24) - Nov. 28, 2011, 11:42:06 AM EST
                         partially correct - (boxley) - Nov. 28, 2011, 11:45:41 AM EST
                         Want to give some examples? - (beepster) - (22) - Nov. 28, 2011, 12:27:36 PM EST
                             Google "double taxation" - (drook) - (21) - Nov. 28, 2011, 12:55:06 PM EST
                                 I did, this may help explain your confusion - (boxley) - (3) - Nov. 28, 2011, 01:07:37 PM EST
                                     I'm not confused - (drook) - (2) - Nov. 28, 2011, 01:21:40 PM EST
                                         thread started with an article - (boxley) - (1) - Nov. 28, 2011, 01:43:30 PM EST
                                             Look what I replied to - (drook) - Nov. 28, 2011, 04:21:24 PM EST
                                 Hmm - (beepster) - (16) - Nov. 28, 2011, 01:27:21 PM EST
                                     Article was on "double taxation" - (drook) - (15) - Nov. 28, 2011, 04:23:57 PM EST
                                         Not a distraction at all - (beepster) - (14) - Nov. 28, 2011, 04:49:00 PM EST
                                             Yes - (drook) - (13) - Nov. 28, 2011, 05:45:56 PM EST
                                                 Then you shouldn't - (beepster) - (12) - Nov. 28, 2011, 05:57:56 PM EST
                                                     That's interesting - (drook) - (11) - Nov. 28, 2011, 06:56:35 PM EST
                                                         Pedantic - (beepster) - (10) - Nov. 28, 2011, 07:04:24 PM EST
                                                             Okay, you win - (drook) - (9) - Nov. 28, 2011, 10:50:48 PM EST
                                                                 I didn't move anything - (beepster) - (8) - Nov. 28, 2011, 11:02:33 PM EST
                                                                     Yes, "everyone", that's just what I said -NT - (drook) - (7) - Nov. 29, 2011, 04:12:31 AM EST
                                                                         ok, nit correction - (beepster) - (6) - Nov. 29, 2011, 08:06:45 AM EST
                                                                             This enough? - (folkert) - (5) - Nov. 29, 2011, 08:39:35 AM EST
                                                                                 Nope...reason - (beepster) - (2) - Nov. 29, 2011, 08:50:32 AM EST
                                                                                     I just picked the first three that came up... - (folkert) - (1) - Nov. 29, 2011, 12:52:16 PM EST
                                                                                         You were doing drooks work, not mine -NT - (beepster) - Nov. 29, 2011, 05:24:46 PM EST
                                                                                 how about something not written by the attack left? - (boxley) - (1) - Nov. 29, 2011, 11:26:58 AM EST
                                                                                     Re: how about something not written by the attack left? - (beepster) - Nov. 29, 2011, 12:30:14 PM EST
         Dean Baker wants to bail out europe using the Fed - (boxley) - (1) - Nov. 28, 2011, 01:45:11 PM EST
             Did you read all the way to the end? - (drook) - Nov. 28, 2011, 04:32:33 PM EST

We have a moral imperative.
84 ms