I'm not confused

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #351,394 by drook 11/28/11 1:21:40 PM Reply	I'm not confused That just explains why people use the term. It's still just as wrong as when this thread started. -- Drew
Post #351,396 by boxley 11/28/11 1:43:30 PM Reply	thread started with an article that explains how stuff works. Beep and I agree with the Author that indeed, thats how stuff works. Why are you all in a lather again for? Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 55 years. meep
Post #351,405 by drook 11/28/11 4:21:24 PM Reply	Look what I replied to the argument that tax on dividends is double taxation is a cute one...but a stupid one. Not worth a column. If people are still making the false claim, then refuting that claim is still worth a column. -- Drew

Dean Baker on corporate taxes. - (Another Scott) - (32) - Nov. 27, 2011, 03:09:01 PM EST

why would it be anything else? - (boxley) - Nov. 27, 2011, 03:43:53 PM EST

Interesting? Not very... - (beepster) - (28) - Nov. 27, 2011, 06:56:09 PM EST

So that argument *doesn't* keep coming up? - (drook) - (27) - Nov. 28, 2011, 10:11:35 AM EST

what makes you think that class understands incorporation? -NT - (boxley) - Nov. 28, 2011, 10:12:32 AM EST

Re: So that argument *doesn't* keep coming up? - (beepster) - (25) - Nov. 28, 2011, 11:02:09 AM EST

Ahh, got it - (drook) - (24) - Nov. 28, 2011, 11:42:06 AM EST

partially correct - (boxley) - Nov. 28, 2011, 11:45:41 AM EST

Want to give some examples? - (beepster) - (22) - Nov. 28, 2011, 12:27:36 PM EST

Google "double taxation" - (drook) - (21) - Nov. 28, 2011, 12:55:06 PM EST

I did, this may help explain your confusion - (boxley) - (3) - Nov. 28, 2011, 01:07:37 PM EST

I'm not confused - (drook) - (2) - Nov. 28, 2011, 01:21:40 PM EST

thread started with an article - (boxley) - (1) - Nov. 28, 2011, 01:43:30 PM EST

Look what I replied to - (drook) - Nov. 28, 2011, 04:21:24 PM EST

Hmm - (beepster) - (16) - Nov. 28, 2011, 01:27:21 PM EST

Article was on "double taxation" - (drook) - (15) - Nov. 28, 2011, 04:23:57 PM EST

Not a distraction at all - (beepster) - (14) - Nov. 28, 2011, 04:49:00 PM EST

Yes - (drook) - (13) - Nov. 28, 2011, 05:45:56 PM EST

Then you shouldn't - (beepster) - (12) - Nov. 28, 2011, 05:57:56 PM EST

That's interesting - (drook) - (11) - Nov. 28, 2011, 06:56:35 PM EST

Pedantic - (beepster) - (10) - Nov. 28, 2011, 07:04:24 PM EST

Okay, you win - (drook) - (9) - Nov. 28, 2011, 10:50:48 PM EST

I didn't move anything - (beepster) - (8) - Nov. 28, 2011, 11:02:33 PM EST

Yes, "everyone", that's just what I said -NT - (drook) - (7) - Nov. 29, 2011, 04:12:31 AM EST

ok, nit correction - (beepster) - (6) - Nov. 29, 2011, 08:06:45 AM EST

This enough? - (folkert) - (5) - Nov. 29, 2011, 08:39:35 AM EST

Nope...reason - (beepster) - (2) - Nov. 29, 2011, 08:50:32 AM EST

I just picked the first three that came up... - (folkert) - (1) - Nov. 29, 2011, 12:52:16 PM EST

You were doing drooks work, not mine -NT - (beepster) - Nov. 29, 2011, 05:24:46 PM EST

how about something not written by the attack left? - (boxley) - (1) - Nov. 29, 2011, 11:26:58 AM EST

Re: how about something not written by the attack left? - (beepster) - Nov. 29, 2011, 12:30:14 PM EST

Dean Baker wants to bail out europe using the Fed - (boxley) - (1) - Nov. 28, 2011, 01:45:11 PM EST

Did you read all the way to the end? - (drook) - Nov. 28, 2011, 04:32:33 PM EST

Dutch man on the mizzen mast!
48 ms