that one talks about individuals buying, and yep, thats different.
Doesn't really change my opinion on the matter..but you are correct that this would not be security procedure of the administration.
Not the same article
that one talks about individuals buying, and yep, thats different.
Doesn't really change my opinion on the matter..but you are correct that this would not be security procedure of the administration. Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
|
|
Actually you're wrong two ways
Buy backs are acceptable (and SOP) if the administration is buying equipment from individuals for security.
However, 1) Individuals buying hard-drives from governments (for security) is very unusual. Assuming it's purely security related, the other problem... 2) How is this NOT favoritism? These drives weren't auctioned off. They did NOT belong to Romney personally, they belonged to the state. If I can buy a drive, can I buy a computer? A boat? A plane? What price was paid? When I worked as a Government Contractor, I was not allowed to buy *ANYTHING* except through an action. But then again, Romney is a Republican. If Obama did this, you can bet people would yell. (Hell, they yelled about Clinton's administration walking off with 'W' keys from the keyboards!) |
|
As I said, if you would read
the initial article mentioned nothing of individuals, it was said "the administration"..which, btw, is the government.
If it was individuals, then it is NOT SOP. I know this. And said as much. The opinion that doesn't change is the one where I said "I don't care". The W key thing was stupid too, but also destruction of property, not hiding anything. Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
|
|
GAO report.
http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d02360.pdf (220 page .PDF):
 Twenty-six EOP staff said that they observed a total of 30 to 64 computer keyboards with missing or damaged ÂW keys. Two former Clinton administration staff said that they saw a total of 3 or 4 keyboards with missing ÂW keys. There were 518 people working for the EOP the first few weeks of 2001. Interesting that it seemingly took 3 months for the keyboard purchases to be approved. I guess they hadn't heard of the GSA yet. Cheers, Scott. |
|
Interesting?
That's pretty quick for gov procurement
Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
|
|
Heh. Don't think so.
|
|
Destruction? Really?
I don't know about you, but if a computer won't work with a keyboard, it certainly won't work if the hard drive is taken.
Then it becomes a matter of semantics: If I take a 'W' and leave a quarter, is that better or worse than taking a hard drive and leaving $100 bill? You could argue that Romney's aides had permission...I'd argue from whom. Then I'd question if the Clinton administration officials had permission. :-) And the follow-up is still on the table - who gave Romney's aides permission to "buy" the hard drives and at what price? That question isn't insignificant. |