IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Another RepubliCANT destroying govt. records

But in a fairly stunning admission today during an interview http://www.nashuatel...h2012/mitt-romney with the editorial board of the Nashua Telegraph in New Hampshire, Romney suggested that his administration deleted emails because they didn’t want “opposition research teams” to have access to them:

ROMNEY: Well, I think in government we should follow the law. And there has never been an administration that has provided to the opposition research team, or to the public, electronic communications. So ours would have been the first.



While Romney’s claim that no previous administration had kept emails may be true, that’s hardly a strong precedent given that emailing was not commonplace for very many years before Romney took office.

Meanwhile, Romney clearly broke precedent with the hard drive buybacks, as staffers for previous administration called the purchases “unheard of.” Terry Dolan, who worked in six previous administrations in the state, told the Globe, “That had not happened prior to the end of the Romney administration.” http://bostonglobe.c...bhwk1K/story.html “I don’t remember anybody buying their hard drives. I don’t remember anybody buying anything,’’ said Stephen Crosby, who worked for Romney’s two predecessors.



http://thinkprogress...cordsdestruction/




"Chicago to my mind was the only place to be. ... I above all liked the city because it was filled with people all a-bustle, and the clatter of hooves and carriages, and with delivery wagons and drays and peddlers and the boom and clank of freight trains. And when those black clouds came sailing in from the west, pouring thunderstorms upon us so that you couldn't hear the cries or curses of humankind, I liked that best of all. Chicago could stand up to the worst God had to offer. I understood why it was built--a place for trade, of course, with railroads and ships and so on, but mostly to give all of us a magnitude of defiance that is not provided by one house on the plains. And the plains is where those storms come from."

-- E.L. Doctorow
New republicans are destroying solyndra records! stop them!
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 55 years. meep
New Got proof?




"Chicago to my mind was the only place to be. ... I above all liked the city because it was filled with people all a-bustle, and the clatter of hooves and carriages, and with delivery wagons and drays and peddlers and the boom and clank of freight trains. And when those black clouds came sailing in from the west, pouring thunderstorms upon us so that you couldn't hear the cries or curses of humankind, I liked that best of all. Chicago could stand up to the worst God had to offer. I understood why it was built--a place for trade, of course, with railroads and ships and so on, but mostly to give all of us a magnitude of defiance that is not provided by one house on the plains. And the plains is where those storms come from."

-- E.L. Doctorow
New why, you dont need any an insinuation is perfectly valid :-)
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 55 years. meep
New So, in other words: No you don't




"Chicago to my mind was the only place to be. ... I above all liked the city because it was filled with people all a-bustle, and the clatter of hooves and carriages, and with delivery wagons and drays and peddlers and the boom and clank of freight trains. And when those black clouds came sailing in from the west, pouring thunderstorms upon us so that you couldn't hear the cries or curses of humankind, I liked that best of all. Chicago could stand up to the worst God had to offer. I understood why it was built--a place for trade, of course, with railroads and ships and so on, but mostly to give all of us a magnitude of defiance that is not provided by one house on the plains. And the plains is where those storms come from."

-- E.L. Doctorow
New A simple easy boxtroll stop - I Like
Sorry box, sometimes it's gotta be done.
New Re: Another RepubliCANT destroying govt. records
hard drive buyback is a pretty garden variety security protocol.
Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
New read the last paragraph that I posted again
this has nothing to do with security and everything to do with Mittens covering his political ass.




"Chicago to my mind was the only place to be. ... I above all liked the city because it was filled with people all a-bustle, and the clatter of hooves and carriages, and with delivery wagons and drays and peddlers and the boom and clank of freight trains. And when those black clouds came sailing in from the west, pouring thunderstorms upon us so that you couldn't hear the cries or curses of humankind, I liked that best of all. Chicago could stand up to the worst God had to offer. I understood why it was built--a place for trade, of course, with railroads and ships and so on, but mostly to give all of us a magnitude of defiance that is not provided by one house on the plains. And the plains is where those storms come from."

-- E.L. Doctorow
New Re: read the last paragraph that I posted again
Whatever. Just saying that buyback is a SOP for data security. I know it doesn't fit with your conspiracy theory.
Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
New Well, if it's SOP
for politicians leaving office to allow their employees to buy their PC's hard drives, then you should have no problem posting links to articles to support this theory.

I'm on Google right now and have yet to find EVEN ONE article to support your viewpoint.




"Chicago to my mind was the only place to be. ... I above all liked the city because it was filled with people all a-bustle, and the clatter of hooves and carriages, and with delivery wagons and drays and peddlers and the boom and clank of freight trains. And when those black clouds came sailing in from the west, pouring thunderstorms upon us so that you couldn't hear the cries or curses of humankind, I liked that best of all. Chicago could stand up to the worst God had to offer. I understood why it was built--a place for trade, of course, with railroads and ships and so on, but mostly to give all of us a magnitude of defiance that is not provided by one house on the plains. And the plains is where those storms come from."

-- E.L. Doctorow
New Re: Well, if it's SOP
Didn't say anything about specificity to politicians. I said hard drive buyback is part of info security. Any leased or shared machine that may have sensitive info has the drive removed (bought back) and destroyed. Also done with photocopiers and large printers.

Our high-sec machines have removables that are placed in locked vaults when not in use.

Romney could very well have been doing it only to hide something...don't know and don't care.
Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
New Whoa
Individual employees do NOT get the hard disk when it is a security issue. The organization gets them, and then wipes / shreds them via a professional approved method. End users are NOT left with this responsibility.

Cut that shit out, you attempted to paint a blatant INSECURE action (wide insecure dispersal of various information, probably including their email history) with a sheen of security. There is a difference between hiding something (both what they were doing and how they were doing it) and securely destroying something. And they didn't want to be seen as destroying them.

This was NOT security related then (except to hide their history that SHOULD have been in the public eye), and it certainly doesn't pass the laugh test now.

Give me one security guy (you ain't) who will agree with you. Not happening.

BTW: You watching the various SCADA blowups happening lately? Can't be secured.
Expand Edited by crazy Nov. 23, 2011, 05:31:15 AM EST
New Re: Whoa
Read the article. Says the administration, not the individuals.
Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
New I did. You're wrong. Sorry.
http://bostonglobe.c...bhwk1K/story.html
New Not the same article
that one talks about individuals buying, and yep, thats different.

Doesn't really change my opinion on the matter..but you are correct that this would not be security procedure of the administration.
Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
New Actually you're wrong two ways
Buy backs are acceptable (and SOP) if the administration is buying equipment from individuals for security.

However,
1) Individuals buying hard-drives from governments (for security) is very unusual.

Assuming it's purely security related, the other problem...
2) How is this NOT favoritism? These drives weren't auctioned off. They did NOT belong to Romney personally, they belonged to the state. If I can buy a drive, can I buy a computer? A boat? A plane? What price was paid?

When I worked as a Government Contractor, I was not allowed to buy *ANYTHING* except through an action.

But then again, Romney is a Republican. If Obama did this, you can bet people would yell.

(Hell, they yelled about Clinton's administration walking off with 'W' keys from the keyboards!)
New As I said, if you would read
the initial article mentioned nothing of individuals, it was said "the administration"..which, btw, is the government.

If it was individuals, then it is NOT SOP. I know this. And said as much.

The opinion that doesn't change is the one where I said "I don't care".

The W key thing was stupid too, but also destruction of property, not hiding anything.
Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
New GAO report.
http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d02360.pdf (220 page .PDF):

• Twenty-six EOP staff said that they observed a total of 30 to 64 computer keyboards with missing or damaged “W” keys. Two former Clinton administration staff said that they saw a total of 3 or 4 keyboards with missing “W” keys.

• Purchase records indicated that the EOP bought 62 computer keyboards on January 23 and 24, 2001. The January 23 purchase request for 31 keyboards indicated that the keyboards were “needed to support the transition,” and the January 24 purchase request for another 31 keyboards indicated that it was a “second request for the letter ‘W’ problem.” The purchase requests were approved by an OA financial manager who, in April 2001, sent an E-mail to an OA branch chief indicating that the 62 keyboards purchased in January 2001 were approximately the number that were defective because “W” keys were missing or inoperable during the transition. (The actual number of keyboards that were damaged during the transition is uncertain because of different statements provided by EOP staff regarding the number of damaged keyboards that had to be replaced.)


There were 518 people working for the EOP the first few weeks of 2001.

Interesting that it seemingly took 3 months for the keyboard purchases to be approved. I guess they hadn't heard of the GSA yet.

Cheers,
Scott.
New Interesting?
That's pretty quick for gov procurement
Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
New Heh. Don't think so.
New Destruction? Really?
I don't know about you, but if a computer won't work with a keyboard, it certainly won't work if the hard drive is taken.

Then it becomes a matter of semantics: If I take a 'W' and leave a quarter, is that better or worse than taking a hard drive and leaving $100 bill?

You could argue that Romney's aides had permission...I'd argue from whom. Then I'd question if the Clinton administration officials had permission. :-)

And the follow-up is still on the table - who gave Romney's aides permission to "buy" the hard drives and at what price? That question isn't insignificant.
New Why don't you care?
He could be 1 of 2 choices in your future.
Or are you just going to go with the flow, and not look too deep?
Or it simply won't matter, and you've already made your decision.

I wanna know.
I don't know what I don't know.
I wanna know everything I can on both sides.
New between useless fek and a white useless fek?
depends on who looks like they will win the senate and keep the house, if its the repos Im voting for Obama
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 55 years. meep
New Very simple
I have no expectation of ownership over email correspondence. I don't see this as fodder for conspiracy. Period. For some, they seem to think it makes things more " transparent" . I think it's a terrible waste of hard disk space. If someone really wants to keep a secret in gov. It will be kept.
Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
New I worked as a contractor/vendor for...
Governmental Agencies.

The stuff I worked on were Labeling machines.

If it was in a governmental facility (USPS, Federal Mint, DOJ were a few I was in), and it had a hard drive in it, the drive either stayed in the facility and was permanently kept by them or the drive was shredded (yes, shredded in physical terms) first and then returned in a plastic baggy with the machine.

This was back in the early 90s. Its just gotten worse since then.
New More at the Great Orange Satan.
http://www.dailykos....%A0law?via=blog_1

FWIW.

Cheers,
Scott.
New Ah, dailykos wnd for the lincoln's of america
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 55 years. meep
New Heh. Lots o linkies there.
New but they do post the truth
cause if they didn't, someone would have sued them off the Internet by now.




"Chicago to my mind was the only place to be. ... I above all liked the city because it was filled with people all a-bustle, and the clatter of hooves and carriages, and with delivery wagons and drays and peddlers and the boom and clank of freight trains. And when those black clouds came sailing in from the west, pouring thunderstorms upon us so that you couldn't hear the cries or curses of humankind, I liked that best of all. Chicago could stand up to the worst God had to offer. I understood why it was built--a place for trade, of course, with railroads and ships and so on, but mostly to give all of us a magnitude of defiance that is not provided by one house on the plains. And the plains is where those storms come from."

-- E.L. Doctorow
New ROFL! why is wnd still publishing then?
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 55 years. meep
New cause they've got millions in the bank
and DailyKos exists on donations.




"Chicago to my mind was the only place to be. ... I above all liked the city because it was filled with people all a-bustle, and the clatter of hooves and carriages, and with delivery wagons and drays and peddlers and the boom and clank of freight trains. And when those black clouds came sailing in from the west, pouring thunderstorms upon us so that you couldn't hear the cries or curses of humankind, I liked that best of all. Chicago could stand up to the worst God had to offer. I understood why it was built--a place for trade, of course, with railroads and ships and so on, but mostly to give all of us a magnitude of defiance that is not provided by one house on the plains. And the plains is where those storms come from."

-- E.L. Doctorow
New cause they've got millions in the bank
prove it
and Soros and ilk provide KOS with plenty of donations
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 55 years. meep
New see #54193




"Chicago to my mind was the only place to be. ... I above all liked the city because it was filled with people all a-bustle, and the clatter of hooves and carriages, and with delivery wagons and drays and peddlers and the boom and clank of freight trains. And when those black clouds came sailing in from the west, pouring thunderstorms upon us so that you couldn't hear the cries or curses of humankind, I liked that best of all. Chicago could stand up to the worst God had to offer. I understood why it was built--a place for trade, of course, with railroads and ships and so on, but mostly to give all of us a magnitude of defiance that is not provided by one house on the plains. And the plains is where those storms come from."

-- E.L. Doctorow
New :-)
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 55 years. meep
New Besides, Soros funds MediaMatters
man, I just can't keep these right wing conspiracy theories straight anymore ...




"Chicago to my mind was the only place to be. ... I above all liked the city because it was filled with people all a-bustle, and the clatter of hooves and carriages, and with delivery wagons and drays and peddlers and the boom and clank of freight trains. And when those black clouds came sailing in from the west, pouring thunderstorms upon us so that you couldn't hear the cries or curses of humankind, I liked that best of all. Chicago could stand up to the worst God had to offer. I understood why it was built--a place for trade, of course, with railroads and ships and so on, but mostly to give all of us a magnitude of defiance that is not provided by one house on the plains. And the plains is where those storms come from."

-- E.L. Doctorow
New here, have some help
http://www.liveleak....?i=e54_1294533701
Daily Kos, DemocraticUnderground, and other George Soros-funded Leftist sites routinely use turns of phrase that seem to encourage bodily harm towards their political opponents. If someone at Kos, in particular, does not like you, stories will appear there urging Kos readers to teach you a lesson in physical ways, to get you to either shut up or toe whatever line the Left is insisting on that day.
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 55 years. meep
New you'd be a lot more believeable
if you had a link to Daily Kos's site where they list Soros as a financial supporter.




"Chicago to my mind was the only place to be. ... I above all liked the city because it was filled with people all a-bustle, and the clatter of hooves and carriages, and with delivery wagons and drays and peddlers and the boom and clank of freight trains. And when those black clouds came sailing in from the west, pouring thunderstorms upon us so that you couldn't hear the cries or curses of humankind, I liked that best of all. Chicago could stand up to the worst God had to offer. I understood why it was built--a place for trade, of course, with railroads and ships and so on, but mostly to give all of us a magnitude of defiance that is not provided by one house on the plains. And the plains is where those storms come from."

-- E.L. Doctorow
     Another RepubliCANT destroying govt. records - (lincoln) - (36)
         republicans are destroying solyndra records! stop them! -NT - (boxley) - (4)
             Got proof? -NT - (lincoln) - (3)
                 why, you dont need any an insinuation is perfectly valid :-) -NT - (boxley) - (1)
                     So, in other words: No you don't -NT - (lincoln)
                 A simple easy boxtroll stop - I Like - (crazy)
         Re: Another RepubliCANT destroying govt. records - (beepster) - (18)
             read the last paragraph that I posted again - (lincoln) - (17)
                 Re: read the last paragraph that I posted again - (beepster) - (16)
                     Well, if it's SOP - (lincoln) - (15)
                         Re: Well, if it's SOP - (beepster) - (13)
                             Whoa - (crazy) - (9)
                                 Re: Whoa - (beepster) - (8)
                                     I did. You're wrong. Sorry. - (crazy) - (7)
                                         Not the same article - (beepster) - (6)
                                             Actually you're wrong two ways - (S1mon_Jester) - (5)
                                                 As I said, if you would read - (beepster) - (4)
                                                     GAO report. - (Another Scott) - (2)
                                                         Interesting? - (beepster) - (1)
                                                             Heh. Don't think so. -NT - (Another Scott)
                                                     Destruction? Really? - (S1mon_Jester)
                             Why don't you care? - (crazy) - (2)
                                 between useless fek and a white useless fek? - (boxley)
                                 Very simple - (beepster)
                         I worked as a contractor/vendor for... - (folkert)
         More at the Great Orange Satan. - (Another Scott) - (11)
             Ah, dailykos wnd for the lincoln's of america -NT - (boxley) - (10)
                 Heh. Lots o linkies there. -NT - (Another Scott)
                 but they do post the truth - (lincoln) - (8)
                     ROFL! why is wnd still publishing then? -NT - (boxley) - (7)
                         cause they've got millions in the bank - (lincoln) - (6)
                             cause they've got millions in the bank - (boxley) - (5)
                                 see #54193 -NT - (lincoln) - (1)
                                     :-) -NT - (boxley)
                                 Besides, Soros funds MediaMatters - (lincoln) - (2)
                                     here, have some help - (boxley) - (1)
                                         you'd be a lot more believeable - (lincoln)

The rest of the nutzo stuff du jour.
141 ms