IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Huh
It SHOULD match, ie:
I read his post as this is the pat:
^/h/d/(.*)

And this is what he's trying to match (he's not great at asking questions, sorry box):
/h/d/blah/blah/foo_bar

In that case, it SHOULD, except, I'm not sure of the use capturing parenthesis on this regexp (should work fine in perl, I'd need to read up on the web server side), and if not needed, I'd drop them.

Also, no anchoring trailing $ should be required. The ".*" should match everything up to the end of the string.
New Read him in his posts
the next line is
pass through /h/d/blah/blah/foo_bar

That why I asked what I did. If the line that isn't matching does begin with the string "pass through " as it does in his post, that's why it ain't matching.
--

Drew
New Calumny!
New oooOOOooo
Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
New Well box, did I misread?
If so, yup, get rid of the carat.
New Hm. I turned that in "passed through"
As in "the regex didn't match and it passed through unmolested" in English.
     any idea on the following rewrite issue - (boxley) - (19)
         Missing $ at end of pattern? -NT - (scoenye)
         Waitaminnit - (drook) - (17)
             Huh - (crazy) - (5)
                 Read him in his posts - (drook) - (4)
                     Calumny! -NT - (pwhysall) - (1)
                         oooOOOooo -NT - (beepster)
                     Well box, did I misread? - (crazy) - (1)
                         Hm. I turned that in "passed through" - (scoenye)
             Log formatting. - (static) - (10)
                 what he said and crazy, mod_rewrite is perl regex -NT - (boxley) - (9)
                     Do the slashes need to be escaped? -NT - (drook) - (1)
                         No. And . will match them as well. -NT - (scoenye)
                     Stupid question... Is mod_rewrite on at that level? -NT - (scoenye) - (6)
                         My first thought as well. -NT - (folkert)
                         yes, it is on as well as the rewrite logging -NT - (boxley) - (4)
                             Up the log level? - (scoenye) - (3)
                                 its at 9 - (boxley) - (2)
                                     Scratching head... - (scoenye) - (1)
                                         think I found it - (boxley)

It's no worse an idea than Napoleon invading Russia, or New Coke.
89 ms