you made a huge deal of the power of the worker being able to better themselves in dealing against corporations, you've made no mention of anything that the government has done to make things better for humanity.
Now you recant...by reframing my argument as a "race to the bottom" and saying that the heads of corps are getting even more wealthy, alluding to a position that workers are powerless to stop this (which you spend a great deal of time with exactly the opposite position in the post prior)
So it would be better to leave those folks in India jobless and living off of less than $100 per year than to subject someone in this country to poverty defined as living off 90x that number?
Which is it? Do you want to bring the >real< bottom up or just ensure that we make things better for the people who already have more than most of the civilized world?