sure I am

Post #347,491 by beepster 9/7/11 9:57:50 PM Reply	sure I am you won't..even if you know what I say is true. Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
Post #347,523 by crazy 9/8/11 1:48:36 PM Reply	No it's not Fox gave you something to yell about. When those of us that care about clarity point out it is OBVIOUSLY a get out the vote speech that was mangled by Fox to explicitly rile people up (like you), you then go: Hey, they are a bunch of violent scum-bags (paraphrased of course), so it really means what fox mangled it to mean. Which Rand did not take kindly too. For good reason. And for now on I get to pick and choose every 3rd word you write and put them in your mouth. Same thing. C'mon Beep, you used to do so much better.
Post #347,527 by beepster 9/8/11 2:22:52 PM Reply	That's crap and you know it the entire posturing on Rush and Palin post Tucson was ALL THE SAME. Snippets pulled completely out of context (and the context, especially for Palin, was specifically get out to vote)..THE EXACT SAME SITUATION AND CONTEXT. So this is different exactly how? And for what "good reason" would that be. Are you denying the Teamsters have a violent history? There's a UPS driver just recently recovering from stab wounds at the hands of teamsters who though he shouldn't cross a line. And there are a very large amount of other examples of teamster violence...and proven ties to organized crime. Yes its a glorious history. good reason. riiight. Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
Post #347,537 by crazy 9/8/11 4:41:08 PM Reply	Hmm. Dunno about Palin snippets. Know why? I'm pretty sure nothing she writes (or has ghost written) is worth the time taken away from, hmm, oh, I dunno. Anything? So I won't be going for context there. No point. As far as the rest. History of violence? But they've done so much for their members. And society as a whole. Not that I excuse it, just it's pretty much the same story of the Catholic church, except the church has another level of pedophilia to damn it over. Yet even I see some of the societal benefits of it. So, do the holy wars define the church? The ass raping priests? Or the whole story? Note: I'm not a rabid union supporter. They are simply better than the alternative, ie: people treated worse than animals, interchangeable pegs in the most inhumane conditions, yadda yadda yadda. And no, it's not crap. By the way, you are usually a bit more reserved (in your mild smirky snarky way) in the subject line. I hit a nerve or something?
Post #347,539 by beepster 9/8/11 5:03:15 PM Reply	Continued If a representative of the church came out now talking about "cute boys"...how do you think that would be covered...under a veil of how much good they do for society? Doubt it very much. And dismissing Palin's treatment because you don't feel her worthy of your time doesn't change the fact that the press did..and all but accused her of the shooting itself...but in this case they seemed much more worried about dismissing because of context (which, by the way, was exactly the same). Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.

Welcome to IWETHEY!