Sorry, it doesn't prove what you think

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #3,465 by drewk 8/1/01 2:50:24 PM Reply	Sorry, it doesn't prove what you think That proves that a hardware/software solution is insufficient to automatically generate fines. It doesn't say anything about the legality of such a system existing, or of the police using it to gather information they can then use as the basis for further investigation. This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
Post #3,474 by boxley 8/1/01 3:32:33 PM Reply	"Accordingly they were illegal at the outset " end quote Our bureaucracy and our laws have turned the world into a clean, safe work camp. We are raising a nation of slaves. Chuck Palahniuk
Post #3,481 by drewk 8/1/01 4:09:34 PM Reply	"They" refers to the citations, not the cameras This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.

cameras illegal new thread - (boxley) - (6) - Aug. 1, 2001, 02:44:41 PM EDT

Sorry, it doesn't prove what you think - (drewk) - (2) - Aug. 1, 2001, 02:50:24 PM EDT

"Accordingly they were illegal at the outset " end quote -NT - (boxley) - (1) - Aug. 1, 2001, 03:32:33 PM EDT

"They" refers to the citations, not the cameras -NT - (drewk) - Aug. 1, 2001, 04:09:34 PM EDT

The problem evokes too many related questions - (Ashton) - Aug. 1, 2001, 04:27:23 PM EDT

Re: cameras illegal new thread - (addison) - (1) - Aug. 1, 2001, 08:37:24 PM EDT

not in Alaska - (boxley) - Aug. 2, 2001, 08:14:58 AM EDT

It doesn’t get tagged as pathological, even if using it means you ignore actual people.
32 ms