IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Re: It's called advocacy.
"Governments need to be able to plan a budget"

really? might want to tell that the current and prior congress.

and I don't disagree. and he does it the exact same way I've actually been arguing should be the way. 200k is not the number. 1M is the number.

But, back to PB's point (and box's)...if he feels guilty about it..which it seems like he does...he could lead by example...this governments as good a charity case as there is now...a check for $5B would fund some good public works.
Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
New He could do a lot better than 5 billion.
If 6.9 million was only 17.4% of his "taxable income" (which, I take to mean his total income minus an inordinate amount of deductions), then his "taxable income" was north of 39 million. How about he sends in 20 billion? That would be less than 1/2 his net worth, leaving him 25 billion to help him through the tough times. I'm sure if he tries really, really, really, hard and tightens his belt a little, he can somehow survive on 19 million for the year. Seriously, these numbers would be laughable if they weren't so obscene.

Edit: Confusion of ideas. Too busy at work.
Expand Edited by mmoffitt Aug. 17, 2011, 01:50:05 PM EDT
New Think you transposed m / b in there
--

Drew
New Forget it, he's rolling...
Good time for an animal house reference
Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
New Holy Crap!
That was sentence spaghetti! I had two thoughts going through my head as I wrote that, first, Buffet had about 40 million in taxable income. Second, his net worth is 45 Billion.
New Hah!
Confusion of ideas. Too busy at work.

"Gee, sorry guys. I was too busy at work to pay sufficient attention to this non-work-related discussion I was trying to have."
--

Drew
New :0)
     Good call, Pat - (beepster) - (20)
         only wingnuts take that bigot seriously - (lincoln) - (17)
             because they already think they pay enuff? justa guess -NT - (boxley)
             cause they're not writing op-eds - (beepster) - (15)
                 Just checking - (drook) - (14)
                     nice try - (beepster) - (13)
                         Yes, I did ignore it - (drook) - (12)
                             Re: Yes, I did ignore it - (beepster) - (11)
                                 Buffett wasn't talking just about himself -NT - (drook) - (2)
                                     leadership is not just words -NT - (boxley)
                                     Re: Buffett wasn't talking just about himself - (beepster)
                                 It's called advocacy. - (Another Scott) - (7)
                                     Re: It's called advocacy. - (beepster) - (6)
                                         He could do a lot better than 5 billion. - (mmoffitt) - (5)
                                             Think you transposed m / b in there -NT - (drook) - (2)
                                                 Forget it, he's rolling... - (beepster)
                                                 Holy Crap! - (mmoffitt)
                                             Hah! - (drook) - (1)
                                                 :0) -NT - (mmoffitt)
         Actually, I had a close thought - (crazy)
         I was curious - (altmann)

Owner/Operator rig.
57 ms