In quite a few states that would be illegal
Alaska being one of them. The idea to add an incentive to vote is a good one. Just needs to be done legally and that would be left to the states.
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 55 years. meep
|
|
Eh?
http://docs.google.c...spZAHxF-GO2eIqavw
All proxies must be received by the Inspectors before 5 p.m., Alaska daylight Time on Thursday, June 24, 2010, to be valid for the annual meeting. You can also cast your ballot in person on the floor of the annual meeting on June 26 in Craig, Alaska. Be sure to vote to be eligible for the voting incentive of $25, which you can elect to donate to Sealaska Heritage Institute by checking the box at the bottom of the proxy or ballot. Yes, that's not a national election, but rather for an Alaska Native corporation, but I don't see why my proposed refundable credit would be illegal. What's the rationale? Thanks. Cheers, Scott. |
|
thats private not public
http://abclocal.go.c...ngeles&id=6484679
California has a law that bans giving things to people to vote or stay away from the polls. cant find the case listing but barrow alaska had a 100% turnout in elections and voters were offered 5 gallons of gas to show up at the polls. The state brought charges So a lot of state laws would need to be changed. Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 55 years. meep
|
|
But it has nothing to do with state law.
I can understand why one wouldn't want to directly pay people to vote. There's too much opportunity for abuse by winking and nudging and cajoling for a particular outcome.
But "walking around money" - cash to get out the vote - is legal everywhere - http://www.slate.com/id/2202955/ In 2004, John Kerry spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on Philadelphia street money, and ward leaders received checks for as much as $8,000. Individual volunteers can generally expect anywhere from $10 to $200, depending on the location and the type of work they're doing. Federal law trumps state law. I don't see a legal reason why this couldn't be done. It's a checkbox on a form, not someone directly giving someone money. Yes, many people would lie about it and just take the money even if they didn't vote. I don't mind. It's more cash in the economy. And some number will be encouraged to turn out anyway, so it's still a good thing. Cheers, Scott. |
|
It has to be national
To be fair, a voting incentive has to be national. Having different reward systems in different states would be worse then the current system, since states with higher rewards would tend to have higher levels of voting. The small population states could afford to give out better rewards, which would lead to them being even more over represented in Congress.
Jay |