IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Raising "good" cholesterol may kill you.
http://www.nytimes.c...licy/27heart.html

WASHINGTON — Lowering bad cholesterol levels reduces heart attack risks, and researchers have long hoped that raising good cholesterol would help, too. Surprising results from a large government study announced on Thursday suggest that this hope may be misplaced.

The study could change the way doctors treat millions of patients with heart disease. Common wisdom has been that such patients should take a statin drug like Lipitor or Zocor to lower bad cholesterol and, in many cases, the vitamin niacin to raise their good cholesterol. But in the trial, niacin provided no benefit over simple statin therapy.

The results are part of a string of studies that suggest that what doctors thought they knew about cholesterol may be wrong. Studies that track patients over time have for decades shown that patients with higher levels of high-density lipoproteins (H.D.L., or good cholesterol) tend to live longer and have fewer heart problems than those with lower levels of this cholesterol.

Not surprisingly, doctors thought that if they could raise H.D.L. levels, their patients would benefit. So far, that assumption is not panning out. Nobody knows why.

In 2006, Pfizer halted development of a drug that raised good cholesterol levels after studies showed that the medicine increased the risks of death. And on Thursday, government scientists announced that Niaspan, an extended release form of niacin, not only did not provide any protection against heart attacks when taken with Zocor in patients with heart disease but also slightly increased their risk of stroke.

[...]

The study gives no comfort to other drug makers, many of which have been trying to come up with new drugs to raise levels of good cholesterol or otherwise lower heart attack risks. Statins and other drugs have proven so effective in treating heart disease that improvements are proving very tough to find.

The study is also bad news for the F.D.A., which heavily relies on laboratory results to decide whether to approve drugs.

“This study shows that approving drugs and allowing them to stay on the market on the basis of how they affect lipids and other biomarkers is not good policy,” said Dr. Steven Nissen, chairman of cardiovascular medicine at the Cleveland Clinic. “It’s time to have a new regulatory approach.”

[...]


(Emphasis added.)

More details here - http://www.eurekaler...hla-nsc052611.php

Cheers,
Scott.
New Correlation is not cause...
Regards,
-scott
Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson.
New Yup.
There's a reason (probably many reasons) why the body has evolved over millions of years to make the stuff that floats around in our bloodstream. Simple correlations between seeing one thing in one test with some disease or syndrome doesn't mean that one is the result of the other.

The human body is extremely complicated. While we've got to start somewhere in figuring out treatments, we (and especially the press) need to recognize that there's more that we don't know than we do.

Cheers,
Scott.
New What we know:
Drain all the blood out, the body will die.

What we don't know:

Everything else.

Take saturated fats - once the great and absolutely certain diet demon, and still condemned as such by the AHA (which hasn't been right about anything yet). To quote the recent conclusions of an international expert panel on saturated fats, published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition:

"We do not yet have enough evidence to give dietary recommendations for individual SFAs, but the evidence is useful for advising food manufacturers, eg. stearic acid can be used as a replacement for trans fatty acids where appropriate, although the evidence is not sufficient to determine whether it is superior to other SFAs because multiple pathways may be involved and clear data on clinical endpoints are not available."

In other words, "We really don't know a damned thing".

New So ...
We don't know enough to tell you what you should eat, but that won't stop us from telling manufacturers what they should sell you.

Okay, got it, thanks.
--

Drew
New Nit
There's a pretty big difference between "raising cholesterol" and "taking this specific drug, one effect of which is to raise numbers reported on this specific test".
--

Drew
New That too.
     Raising "good" cholesterol may kill you. - (Another Scott) - (6)
         Correlation is not cause... -NT - (malraux) - (3)
             Yup. - (Another Scott) - (2)
                 What we know: - (Andrew Grygus) - (1)
                     So ... - (drook)
         Nit - (drook) - (1)
             That too. -NT - (Another Scott)

No operating system found
42 ms