IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New FICA
Boy I wish we had search....because now you've flipped.

When we talk about income taxes..you talk about how the poor are overtaxed...and use FICA in that calculation...

Now...you ignore FICA as insurance when its the corp side.

I KNOW there are examples of this in banter between us.
Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
New ;-)
It's still got nothing to do with Exxon's corporate income taxes on their earnings.

HTH.

Cheers,
Scott.
Expand Edited by Another Scott May 2, 2011, 10:28:31 PM EDT
New Re: ;-)
But the poor corporation is taxed multiple times, with excise taxes, payroll taxes..why should they have to pay a higher net tax rate than Obama? After all, he's rich!
Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
New ...
New Re: ...
You seemed to like that argument before... ;-)
Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
     exxonmobile 10.7 billion broken out - (boxley) - (38)
         Um, so they count FICA, etc., as taxes paid??? -NT - (Another Scott) - (37)
             They can because they do - (beepster) - (31)
                 Interesting - (S1mon_Jester) - (2)
                     50/50 - (Steve Lowe) - (1)
                         Re: 50/50 - (S1mon_Jester)
                 Is FICA a tax on their profits? No, it isn't. - (Another Scott) - (27)
                     So are you - (beepster) - (13)
                         The topic is Exxon's earnings and taxes on same. HTH. -NT - (Another Scott) - (12)
                             Really? Cause I read in Box's post.... - (beepster) - (11)
                                 It has nothing to do with how much tax they pay on earnings. - (Another Scott) - (10)
                                     Why not? - (beepster) - (9)
                                         You need to review the definition of "earnings", I think. -NT - (Another Scott) - (8)
                                             I don't think so... - (beepster) - (7)
                                                 Heh... - (Another Scott) - (6)
                                                     Ah, I see.. - (beepster) - (5)
                                                         Riddle me this, Batman. - (Another Scott) - (4)
                                                             And my other point.... - (beepster) - (3)
                                                                 The thread's not big enough to handle all of them... ;-) -NT - (Another Scott)
                                                                 I'll vilify them just as much as the Oil Companies. - (folkert) - (1)
                                                                     Beep's a big Bernie Sanders supporter, donchaknow. - (Another Scott)
                     yes it is - (boxley) - (12)
                         No it isn't. - (Another Scott) - (11)
                             FICA - (beepster) - (4)
                                 ;-) - (Another Scott) - (3)
                                     Re: ;-) - (beepster) - (2)
                                         ... -NT - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                             Re: ... - (beepster)
                             feds dont take out fica for their employeees they are exempt - (boxley) - (5)
                                 You're wrong about that, too. - (Another Scott) - (4)
                                     Only because he stated an absolute.. - (beepster) - (3)
                                         No, he was wrong because he was wrong. HTH. -NT - (Another Scott) - (2)
                                             Forgive us for being old... - (beepster) - (1)
                                                 :-) I'm getting up there too. -NT - (Another Scott)
             is it a tax? Yeah because you cant opt out as a company -NT - (boxley) - (4)
                 Not sure that's true - (S1mon_Jester) - (3)
                     rare corner case for a very few employers - (boxley) - (2)
                         Ahem...didn't argue that it wasn't rare. - (S1mon_Jester) - (1)
                             Dunno if they do now, but ... - (mmoffitt)

You signed the Memo of Understanding...!
79 ms