IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New I don't think so...
you are artificially limiting the discussion to earnings...I didn't see that limitation anywhere but in your posts.

So, who is obfuscating? In this case, since BILLIONS of payments to the government are simply being ignored for purposes of >your< argument...my guess is that would be you :-)
Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
New Heh...
http://www.exxonmobi...ar-in-washington/

ExxonMobil’s earnings: The real story you won’t hear in Washington
April 28, 2011 | Posted by Ken Cohen

Big numbers make headlines – like our announcement of $10.7 billion in earnings for the first quarter of 2011.


The rest of it was obfuscation.

HTH.

Cheers,
Scott.
New Ah, I see..
the 6 cents a gallon vs the governments take of 60.

I get it.

Thats just a ruse.
Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
New Riddle me this, Batman.
Are governments supposed to make a profit? Are governments designed to have "earnings"? Are we to believe that nobody would buy gasoline if Exxon-Mobil didn't sell it?

Maybe they should get credit on their taxes for using a San-Serif font in their press release - it makes as much sense as their "argument". :-/

Their press release talking about paying FICA and what consumers pay in gasoline taxes and the like is obfuscation. It has nothing to do with taxes on their $10.7B quarterly earnings. That is all.

EOT.

Cheers,
Scott.
New And my other point....
that they, at least, paid income taxes...unlike several other very high profile companies...but we aren't vilifying >them<, now are we?...oh no...its much more sexy to pick on the oil companies.
Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
New The thread's not big enough to handle all of them... ;-)
New I'll vilify them just as much as the Oil Companies.
I don't think any of them pay enough.
New Beep's a big Bernie Sanders supporter, donchaknow.
http://blogs.suntime...nies_avoidin.html

;-)

Cheers,
Scott.
     exxonmobile 10.7 billion broken out - (boxley) - (38)
         Um, so they count FICA, etc., as taxes paid??? -NT - (Another Scott) - (37)
             They can because they do - (beepster) - (31)
                 Interesting - (S1mon_Jester) - (2)
                     50/50 - (Steve Lowe) - (1)
                         Re: 50/50 - (S1mon_Jester)
                 Is FICA a tax on their profits? No, it isn't. - (Another Scott) - (27)
                     So are you - (beepster) - (13)
                         The topic is Exxon's earnings and taxes on same. HTH. -NT - (Another Scott) - (12)
                             Really? Cause I read in Box's post.... - (beepster) - (11)
                                 It has nothing to do with how much tax they pay on earnings. - (Another Scott) - (10)
                                     Why not? - (beepster) - (9)
                                         You need to review the definition of "earnings", I think. -NT - (Another Scott) - (8)
                                             I don't think so... - (beepster) - (7)
                                                 Heh... - (Another Scott) - (6)
                                                     Ah, I see.. - (beepster) - (5)
                                                         Riddle me this, Batman. - (Another Scott) - (4)
                                                             And my other point.... - (beepster) - (3)
                                                                 The thread's not big enough to handle all of them... ;-) -NT - (Another Scott)
                                                                 I'll vilify them just as much as the Oil Companies. - (folkert) - (1)
                                                                     Beep's a big Bernie Sanders supporter, donchaknow. - (Another Scott)
                     yes it is - (boxley) - (12)
                         No it isn't. - (Another Scott) - (11)
                             FICA - (beepster) - (4)
                                 ;-) - (Another Scott) - (3)
                                     Re: ;-) - (beepster) - (2)
                                         ... -NT - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                             Re: ... - (beepster)
                             feds dont take out fica for their employeees they are exempt - (boxley) - (5)
                                 You're wrong about that, too. - (Another Scott) - (4)
                                     Only because he stated an absolute.. - (beepster) - (3)
                                         No, he was wrong because he was wrong. HTH. -NT - (Another Scott) - (2)
                                             Forgive us for being old... - (beepster) - (1)
                                                 :-) I'm getting up there too. -NT - (Another Scott)
             is it a tax? Yeah because you cant opt out as a company -NT - (boxley) - (4)
                 Not sure that's true - (S1mon_Jester) - (3)
                     rare corner case for a very few employers - (boxley) - (2)
                         Ahem...didn't argue that it wasn't rare. - (S1mon_Jester) - (1)
                             Dunno if they do now, but ... - (mmoffitt)

NOO..OOO - not WD-40!
70 ms