IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New rare corner case for a very few employers
and governments
http://www.extension...the-united-states
religious, students, and opt out government employees
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 55 years. meep
New Ahem...didn't argue that it wasn't rare.
It's for any employee not to have to pay FICA.

But, if you're hiring the Amish...


IRC 1402(g) says that members of certain religious faiths (called "religious sects or divisions thereof" in the statute) can be exempted from paying self-employment tax if they file Form 4029 with the IRS and have it accepted. Moreover, IRC 3127 says that if both the employer and the employee file the form, then the employee is exempt from FICA and Medicare tax (both the employer and the employee portions). If the forms aren't filed by both employer and employee and accepted by the IRS, FICA and Medicare tax still apply with full force.

http://benefitslink....s_employer&id=194

New Dunno if they do now, but ...
Long Beach Unified School District teachers didn't pay FICA for decades. TALB (Teachers Association of Long Beach) anyway.
     exxonmobile 10.7 billion broken out - (boxley) - (38)
         Um, so they count FICA, etc., as taxes paid??? -NT - (Another Scott) - (37)
             They can because they do - (beepster) - (31)
                 Interesting - (S1mon_Jester) - (2)
                     50/50 - (Steve Lowe) - (1)
                         Re: 50/50 - (S1mon_Jester)
                 Is FICA a tax on their profits? No, it isn't. - (Another Scott) - (27)
                     So are you - (beepster) - (13)
                         The topic is Exxon's earnings and taxes on same. HTH. -NT - (Another Scott) - (12)
                             Really? Cause I read in Box's post.... - (beepster) - (11)
                                 It has nothing to do with how much tax they pay on earnings. - (Another Scott) - (10)
                                     Why not? - (beepster) - (9)
                                         You need to review the definition of "earnings", I think. -NT - (Another Scott) - (8)
                                             I don't think so... - (beepster) - (7)
                                                 Heh... - (Another Scott) - (6)
                                                     Ah, I see.. - (beepster) - (5)
                                                         Riddle me this, Batman. - (Another Scott) - (4)
                                                             And my other point.... - (beepster) - (3)
                                                                 The thread's not big enough to handle all of them... ;-) -NT - (Another Scott)
                                                                 I'll vilify them just as much as the Oil Companies. - (folkert) - (1)
                                                                     Beep's a big Bernie Sanders supporter, donchaknow. - (Another Scott)
                     yes it is - (boxley) - (12)
                         No it isn't. - (Another Scott) - (11)
                             FICA - (beepster) - (4)
                                 ;-) - (Another Scott) - (3)
                                     Re: ;-) - (beepster) - (2)
                                         ... -NT - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                             Re: ... - (beepster)
                             feds dont take out fica for their employeees they are exempt - (boxley) - (5)
                                 You're wrong about that, too. - (Another Scott) - (4)
                                     Only because he stated an absolute.. - (beepster) - (3)
                                         No, he was wrong because he was wrong. HTH. -NT - (Another Scott) - (2)
                                             Forgive us for being old... - (beepster) - (1)
                                                 :-) I'm getting up there too. -NT - (Another Scott)
             is it a tax? Yeah because you cant opt out as a company -NT - (boxley) - (4)
                 Not sure that's true - (S1mon_Jester) - (3)
                     rare corner case for a very few employers - (boxley) - (2)
                         Ahem...didn't argue that it wasn't rare. - (S1mon_Jester) - (1)
                             Dunno if they do now, but ... - (mmoffitt)

Non cogito ergo nihil, y'all.
51 ms