acts have consequences - (lincoln) - (15) - April 2, 2011, 08:48:32 AM EDT
         *His* stupid act? - (drook) - (14) - April 2, 2011, 09:13:59 AM EDT
             Agreed, however - (lincoln) - (13) - April 3, 2011, 09:59:12 PM EDT
                 Im gonna burn a copy of the movie - (boxley) - (1) - April 4, 2011, 08:33:00 AM EDT
                     None - (lincoln) - April 4, 2011, 09:04:35 PM EDT
                 he is responsible - (SpiceWare) - (8) - April 4, 2011, 02:31:52 PM EDT
                     Why not? Incitement to riot -NT - (drook) - (7) - April 4, 2011, 03:00:31 PM EDT
                         Re: Why not? Incitement to riot - (SpiceWare) - (6) - April 4, 2011, 04:40:55 PM EDT
                             Finally figured out my position - (drook) - (5) - April 6, 2011, 10:10:17 AM EDT
                                 I understand where you're coming from - (SpiceWare) - April 6, 2011, 10:54:44 AM EDT
                                 Intent matters, but that's too low a bar. - (Another Scott) - (2) - April 6, 2011, 01:53:19 PM EDT
                                     Not saying what he did should be illegal - (drook) - (1) - April 6, 2011, 03:55:17 PM EDT
                                         Ah. Agreed. -NT - (Another Scott) - April 6, 2011, 05:52:30 PM EDT
                                 Good analysis. - (static) - April 6, 2011, 10:34:47 PM EDT
                 What was said to the mullahs, though? - (static) - (1) - April 4, 2011, 04:53:03 PM EDT
                     +5 -NT - (beepster) - April 4, 2011, 07:51:10 PM EDT