3rd explosion may have damaged a reactor vessel

Post #340,525 by scoenye 3/14/11 9:24:57 PM Reply	3rd explosion may have damaged a reactor vessel http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-12740843 The blast occurred at reactor 2 at the Fukushima Daiichi plant, which engineers had been trying to stabilise after two other reactors exploded. One minister has said it is "highly likely" that the rods might melt. Radiation levels near the plant have risen. After the third explosion, officials said there were fears that the containment vessel housing the reactor may have been damaged. Higher radiation levels were recorded on Tuesday south of Fukushima, Kyodo news agency reported.
Post #340,526 by Another Scott 3/14/11 9:45:46 PM Reply	The more I read, the worse it sounds... From 3/12: http://www.scientifi...shima-core&page=2 "So there's some advantages to the BWR in terms of severe accidents. But one of the disadvantages is that the containment structure is a lightbulb-shaped steel shell that's only about 30 or 40 feet [nine to 12 meters] acrossÂthick steel, but relatively small compared to large, dry containments like TMI. And it doesn't provide as much of an extra layer of defense from reactor accidents as containments like TMI [do]. So there is a great deal of concern that if the core does melt, the containment will not be able to survive. And if the containment doesn't survive, we have a worst-case situation." And just what is that worst-case scenario? "They're venting in order to keep the containment vessel from failing. But if a core melts, it will slump to the bottom of the reactor vessel, probably melt through the reactor vessel onto the containment floor. It's likely to spread as a molten poolÂlike lavaÂto the edge of the steel shell and melt through. That would result in a containment failure in a matter of less than a day. It's good that it's got a better containment system than Chernobyl, but it's not as strong as most of the reactors in this country." Finally, Bergeron summed up the events so far: "Based on what we understand, the reactor has been shut down, in the sense that all of the control rods have been insertedÂwhich means there's no longer a nuclear reaction. But what you have to worry about is the decay heat that's still in the coreÂthat will last for many days. "And to keep that decay heat of the uranium from melting the core, you have to keep water on it. And the conventional sources of water, the electricity that provides the power for pumps, have failed. So they are using some very unusual methods of getting water into the core, they're using steam-driven turbinesÂthey're operating off of the steam generated by the reactor itself. "But even that system requires electricity in the form of batteries. And the batteries aren't designed to last this long, so they have failed by now. So we don't know exactly how they're getting water to the core or if they're getting enough water to the core. We believe, because of the release of cesium, that the core has been exposed above the water level, at least for a portion of time, and has overheated. What we really need to know is how long can they keep that water flowing. And it needs to be days to keep the core from melting. "The containment, I believe, is still intact. But if the core does melt, that insult will probably not be sustained and the containment vessel will fail. All this, if it were to occur, would take a matter of days. What's crucial is restoring AC power. They've got to get AC power back to the plant to be able to control it. And I'm sure they're working on it." Cheers, Scott.
Post #340,528 by scoenye 3/14/11 9:55:02 PM Reply	Fire engines Can't find the link right now, but that is apparently how they are pumping the water in. It's also why one of the cores ended up getting uncovered: the pumper ran out of gas. The fire suppressing pumps of the turbine halls are also being used but some of those have been damaged by the explosions. The worry is that they may not be able to source enough diesel to keep the pumps going due to the broken supply chain and shortages elsewhere.
Post #340,532 by Another Scott 3/14/11 11:57:07 PM Reply	Yup. http://english.chosu...011031500630.html When the cooling system at the reactor broke down, TEPCO used fire engines to pump seawater into the reactor to cool the rods, but the pump malfunctioned, causing most of the fuel rods to be exposed. If exposed to air, fuel rods overheat and melt, releasing radioactive materials into the atmosphere. TEPCO said it cannot rule out a meltdown due to the exposure of the fuel rods but is bringing the temperature down again by injecting seawater. It added since the reactor is contained by an outer structure there is "no possibility of a worst-case accident." Japanese broadcaster NHK reported the pumps stopped flushing seawater into the reactor after running out of fuel when a plant official who was operating the pumps left his seat to monitor something else. (I'd be surprised if it really came down to one person getting up to go to the toilet (or whatever).) NHK has an English page with information that is probably more timely than the big English news sites - http://www3.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/ Cheers, Scott. (Who wonders how much worse it will be in the morning...)

Welcome to IWETHEY!