IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 1 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New It sounds quite serious.
http://mdn.mainichi....0m0dm010000c.html

TOKYO (AP) -- Japan declared states of emergency for five nuclear reactors at two power plants after the units lost cooling ability in the aftermath of Friday's powerful earthquake. Thousands of residents were evacuated as workers struggled to get the reactors under control to prevent meltdowns.

Operators at the Fukushima Daiichi plant's Unit 1 scrambled ferociously to tamp down heat and pressure inside the reactor after the 8.9 magnitude quake and the tsunami that followed cut off electricity to the site and disabled emergency generators, knocking out the main cooling system.

Some 3,000 people within two miles (three kilometers) of the plant were urged to leave their homes, but the evacuation zone was more than tripled to 6.2 miles (10 kilometers) after authorities detected eight times the normal radiation levels outside the facility and 1,000 times normal inside Unit 1's control room.

The government declared a state of emergency at the Daiichi unit -- the first at a nuclear plant in Japan's history. But hours later, the Tokyo Electric Power Co., which operates the six-reactor Daiichi site in northeastern Japan, announced that it had lost cooling ability at a second reactor there and three units at its nearby Fukushima Daini site.

The government quickly declared states of emergency for those units, too. Nearly 14,000 people living near the two power plants were ordered to evacuate.

Japan's nuclear safety agency said the situation was most dire at Fukushima Daiichi's Unit 1, where pressure had risen to twice what is consider the normal level. The International Atomic Energy Agency said in a statement that diesel generators that normally would have kept cooling systems running at Fukushima Daiichi had been disabled by tsunami flooding.

Officials at the Daiichi facility began venting radioactive vapors from the unit to relieve pressure inside the reactor case. The loss of electricity had delayed that effort for several hours.

Plant workers there labored to cool down the reactor core, but there was no prospect for immediate success. They were temporarily cooling the reactor with a secondary system, but it wasn't working as well as the primary one, according to Yuji Kakizaki, an official at the Japanese nuclear safety agency.

Even once a reactor is shut down, radioactive byproducts give off heat that can ultimately produce volatile hydrogen gas, melt radioactive fuel, or even breach the containment building in a full meltdown belching radioactivity into the surroundings, according to technical and government authorities.

Despite plans for the intentional release of radioactivity, Chief Cabinet Secretary Yukio Edano said the 40-year-old plant was not leaking radiation.

"With evacuation in place and the ocean-bound wind, we can ensure the safety," Edano said at a televised news conference early Saturday.

[...]

Kakizaki, the safety agency official, said the emergency cooling system is intact and could kick in as a last line of defense. "That's as a last resort, and we have not reached that stage yet," he added.

Defense Ministry official Ippo Maeyama said dozens of troops trained for chemical disasters had been dispatched to the plant in case of a radiation leak, along with four vehicles designed for use in atomic, biological and chemical warfare.

Technical experts said the plant would presumably have hours, but probably not days, to try to stabilize things.

Leonard S. Spector, director of the Washington office of the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies, said loss of coolant is the most serious type of accident at a nuclear power plant.

"They are busy trying to get coolant to the core area," said Neil Sheehan, a spokesman for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. "The big thing is trying to get power to the cooling systems."

High-pressure pumps can temporarily cool a reactor in this state with battery power, even when electricity is down, according to Arnold Gundersen, a nuclear engineer who used to work in the U.S. nuclear industry. They can open and close relief valves needed to control pressure. Batteries would go dead within hours but could be replaced.

The IAEA said "mobile electricity supplies" had arrived at the Daiichi plant. It wasn't clear if they were generators or batteries.

It also was not immediately clear how closely the reactor had moved toward dangerous pressure or temperature levels. If temperatures were to keep rising to more than 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit, it could set off a chemical reaction that begins to embrittle the metallic zirconium that sheathes the radioactive uranium fuel.

That reaction releases hydrogen, which can explode when cooling water finally floods back into the reactor. That was also concern for a time during the 1979 Three Mile Island accident in Pennsylvania.

If the reactor temperature keeps reaches around 4,000 degrees, the fuel could melt outright, and the reactor could slump right into the bottom of the containment building in a partial meltdown. Then the crucial question would be whether the building would stay intact.

[...]


Fingers crossed. :-(

Cheers,
Scott.
New Yup, it's quite serious...
http://www.nytimes.c...13nuclear.html?hp

WASHINGTON — An explosion at a nuclear power plant in northern Japan on Saturday blew the roof off one building, brought down walls and caused a radiation leak of unspecified proportions, Japanese officials said, after Friday’s huge earthquake caused critical failures in the plant’s cooling system.

Television images showed a huge cloud of white-gray smoke from the explosion. Soon afterward, government officials said an evacuation zone around the plant had been doubled, to 12 miles.

The chief cabinet secretary, Yukio Edano, confirmed earlier news reports of an explosion at the Fukishima Daiichi nuclear plant, 15o miles north of Tokyo, saying: “We are looking into the cause and the situation and we’ll make that public when we have further information.” He was speaking amid fears that a disastrous meltdown could be imminent after critical cooling failures at that plant and another nearby, Daini, after both were shut down.

Images on Japanese television showed that the walls of one building had crumbled, leaving only a skeletal metal frame standing with smoke billowing from the plant. The Associated Press reported that the damaged building housed a nuclear reactor, though that report was not immediately verified by nuclear officials. The cause of the explosion was unclear, with some experts speculating that it may have resulted from a hydrogen build-up.

[...]

Officials said even before the explosion that they had detected cesium, an indication that some of the fuel was already damaged.

In the form found in reactors, radioactive cesium is a fragment of a uranium atom that has been split. In normal operations, some radioactivity in the cooling water is inevitable, because neutrons, the sub-atomic particles that carry on the chain reaction, hit hydrogen and oxygen atoms in the water and make those radioactive. But cesium, which persists far longer in the environment, comes from the fuel itself.

Naoto Sekimura, a professor at Tokyo University, told NHK, Japan’s public broadcaster, that “only a small portion of the fuel has been melted. But the plant is shut down already, and being cooled down. Most of the fuel is contained in the plant case, so I would like to ask people to be calm.”

[...]


People shouldn't panic, but these officials and nuclear experts need to stop talking as if what is happening is no big deal. It is a big deal.

Brad Friedman has a running blog on the issue with pictures, etc. http://www.bradblog.com/?p=8391 Don't take initial reports as being Gospel.

Japan's Nuclear Safety Agency has a web page with lists of incidents, failures to follow procedures, etc., for their plants up through 2010. Tokyo Electric Power's Fukushima plants are here:

http://www2.jnes.go...._power_index.html
http://www2.jnes.go...._power_index.html

While the listed issues usually aren't frequent, they don't give one a great feeling...

:-(

Cheers,
Scott.
     8.9 magnitude earthquake off NE Japan. Tsunami. - (Another Scott) - (69)
         Nuclear plant can't cool down correctly, evacuation ordered - (jay) - (3)
             It sounds quite serious. - (Another Scott) - (1)
                 Yup, it's quite serious... - (Another Scott)
             Situation looks like it's still getting worse - (jay)
         Continuing coverage after 2nd explosion at Fukushima plant - (Ashton) - (22)
             Really great timing. - (Andrew Grygus) - (1)
                 Have you seen or heard this? - (Another Scott)
             Cooling at 3rd reactor fails after explosion damages pumps - (jay) - (3)
                 “They’re basically in a full-scale panic” - (Another Scott) - (2)
                     Re:They’re basically in a full-scale panic - (boxley) - (1)
                         I'm not so sanguine. - (Another Scott)
             Counter to the prevailing hysteria: - (malraux) - (15)
                 I wish I was all-seeing like Lewis Page. - (Another Scott) - (14)
                     there is a bed of graphite under the containment vessel - (boxley) - (5)
                         It'll stop going down, but maybe not out in the air... - (Another Scott) - (4)
                             but there's still a significant chance of... - (folkert) - (3)
                                 Yes, they're not exposed graphite piles. - (Another Scott) - (2)
                                     Demonstrably, their major error re all the diesels was: - (Ashton)
                                     Well... okay, here goes. - (folkert)
                     More Lewis Page. - (malraux) - (7)
                         Evidently the panic is just that... Panic. - (folkert) - (6)
                             Local news has started berating the coverage. - (static)
                             I wouldn't say "ignored" - (Another Scott) - (4)
                                 I don't believe that was a sigh, Mr. F. -NT - (beepster)
                                 Exactly. - (Ashton)
                                 Since you like Lewis so much... - (malraux) - (1)
                                     Rofl. :-) -NT - (Another Scott)
         3rd explosion may have damaged a reactor vessel - (scoenye) - (3)
             The more I read, the worse it sounds... - (Another Scott) - (2)
                 Fire engines - (scoenye) - (1)
                     Yup. - (Another Scott)
         More on GE BWR designs - (Another Scott) - (2)
             We're sitting on one - (scoenye) - (1)
                 :-( - (Another Scott)
         "It's worse than a meltdown" - (Another Scott) - (2)
             have you purchased the solar panels for your leccy car? - (boxley) - (1)
                 Non sequitur - (Another Scott)
         Something is Strange here.. - (Ashton) - (10)
             It seems they can't. - (Another Scott) - (3)
                 drift chart - (boxley) - (2)
                     Getting us back for WWII? -NT - (folkert)
                     Well, if nuclear power isn't dead yet in the U.S. . . . - (Andrew Grygus)
             I didn't address the fuel storage areas before, obviously. - (Another Scott) - (4)
                 Aye, TMI (info, not 3Mi-Island) of generic kind - (Ashton) - (3)
                     Thanks. - (Another Scott)
                     NYT answers to selected Qs submitted yesterday - (Ashton) - (1)
                         Good Q&A. Would be nice if more reporting was like that... -NT - (Another Scott)
             It's the spent fuel containment pools - (jay)
         Recommended news sites, etc. - (Another Scott) - (8)
             Plus, Bulletin Atom. Sci. chimes in - (Ashton) - (1)
                 Thanks. -NT - (Another Scott)
             One more - (scoenye) - (4)
                 Reuters has something similar. - (Another Scott)
                 Some radiation levels.. and unit comparisons - (Ashton) - (2)
                     The MIT NSE site has some good info, too. - (Another Scott) - (1)
                         If still not suffering from tmi? Oildrum limns mondo links - (Ashton)
             Somewhat related - (Steve Lowe)
         The possibility of re-criticality is not zero - (scoenye) - (1)
             Yikes. - (Another Scott)
         Japan raises incident threat level again - (jay)
         NYTimes summary page of reactor and fuel storage status. - (Another Scott) - (1)
             Re TEPCO credibility - (Ashton)
         Japan Quake Map. - (Another Scott) - (3)
             Wow! what a clever, informative scary piece of work.. - (Ashton) - (2)
                 Not quite the same, but the USGS has ANSS - (Another Scott) - (1)
                     Thanks.. looking. - (Ashton)
         Bulletin. At. Sci. daily reports - (Ashton) - (1)
             Thanks. -NT - (Another Scott)
         Latest on Fukushima from the NYTimes. - (Another Scott)

Do you believe everything you read on the radio?
129 ms