http://www.nytimes.c...me&pagewanted=all
:-(
Cheers,
Scott.
8.9 magnitude earthquake off NE Japan. Tsunami.
|
|
Nuclear plant can't cool down correctly, evacuation ordered
http://www.cnn.com/2...11/japan.nuclear/
Officials ordered an evacuation Friday of residents living near a Japanese nuclear power plant, saying there has been no sign yet of leaks but indicating a struggle to "cool down" the facility. The Fukushima Daiichi is shut down, but because of the damage it isn't cooling properly and it is threatening to overheat. Jay |
|
It sounds quite serious.
http://mdn.mainichi....0m0dm010000c.html
TOKYO (AP) -- Japan declared states of emergency for five nuclear reactors at two power plants after the units lost cooling ability in the aftermath of Friday's powerful earthquake. Thousands of residents were evacuated as workers struggled to get the reactors under control to prevent meltdowns. Fingers crossed. :-( Cheers, Scott. |
|
Yup, it's quite serious...
http://www.nytimes.c...13nuclear.html?hp
WASHINGTON Â An explosion at a nuclear power plant in northern Japan on Saturday blew the roof off one building, brought down walls and caused a radiation leak of unspecified proportions, Japanese officials said, after FridayÂs huge earthquake caused critical failures in the plantÂs cooling system. People shouldn't panic, but these officials and nuclear experts need to stop talking as if what is happening is no big deal. It is a big deal. Brad Friedman has a running blog on the issue with pictures, etc. http://www.bradblog.com/?p=8391 Don't take initial reports as being Gospel. Japan's Nuclear Safety Agency has a web page with lists of incidents, failures to follow procedures, etc., for their plants up through 2010. Tokyo Electric Power's Fukushima plants are here: http://www2.jnes.go...._power_index.html http://www2.jnes.go...._power_index.html While the listed issues usually aren't frequent, they don't give one a great feeling... :-( Cheers, Scott. |
|
Situation looks like it's still getting worse
http://edition.cnn.c...n.nuclear/?hpt=T2
Battered by a terrifying earthquake, exhausted from days of battling a spiralling nuclear crisis, and aware that their loved ones were only miles from the crippled facility, the exhausted workers at the Fukushima No 1 plant must have hoped a new day would finally bring respite. Radiation in the reactor complex has reached the point that the crew had to be pulled out except for a small emergency operations staff. The fire at the 4th unit was put out, but damage at the other three reactors continues to spread. Open air exposure of the nuclear rods or spent fuel rods seems to have occurred, and it's just a question of how far the radiation will spread. Melt down remains possible, but becomes less likely with time as the reactors cool down. On the scale of disaster, this is still between TMI and Chernobyl, but getting closer to Chernobyl. It is still unlikely to be worse then Chernobyl, but it remains possible if one of the reactors containment units fail. Jay |
|
Continuing coverage after 2nd explosion at Fukushima plant
Globe and Mail:
http://www.theglobea...1940219/comments/ Some unusually well-informed/ept commenters within the 300+ Note that one troubled unit (#3) uses MOX, a mixture of U/Pu. Unclear from my limited reactor lore of the temp/danger ranges, including cladding etc. in a LOCA/loss-of-cooling accident event re that mix. Reuters, as linked from a commenter above: http://live.reuters....Japan_earthquake2 Real-time blog re. the now several marginally-cooled reactors in Japan I concur with a poster re the unusually high quality of technical design and execution of these plants, but also with the characterization of typ. minimalising of govt. reports, a cultural more. My geiger counters await the jetstream of coming days :-/ YPB ... ... |
|
Really great timing.
Some guy's letter to the Wall Street Journal saying what we need is a whole lot more nuclear power plants was published the morning of the first explosion.
|
|
Have you seen or heard this?
|
|
Cooling at 3rd reactor fails after explosion damages pumps
http://www.washingto...Bk6rQV_story.html
JapanÂs nuclear crisis deepened Monday as utility officials reported that four out of five pumps being used to flood the unit 2 reactor at the Fukushima Daiichi complex had failed and that the other pump had briefly stopped working, hastening the meltdown of fuel rods that at one point were fully exposed. This is turning into a nasty cascade of disasters. The explosion at the number 3 reactor damaged the pumps at the number 2 reactor, which up until that point had been under control. The fuel rods at the number 2 reactor where exposed to the air for a while, and partially melted. At the 40-year-old Fukushima Daiichi unit 1, where an explosion Saturday destroyed a building housing the reactor, the spent fuel pool, in accordance with General ElectricÂs design, is placed above the reactor. Tokyo Electric said it was trying to figure out how to maintain water levels in the pools, indicating that the normal safety systems there had failed, too. Failure to keep adequate water levels in a pool would lead to a catastrophic fire, said nuclear experts, some of whom think that unit 1Âs pool may now be outside. That is ugly. Considering the explosion at the number 1 reactor, you would have to assume that the water pool has failed by now, and the whole thing is a major disaster waiting to happen. And really, who though putting the storage tank for used fuel above a reactor chamber was a good idea? It might have been convenient because it reduced the distance the rods need to go, but the obvious danger of multiply the disaster if something goes wrong should have ruled it out. Jay |
|
ÂTheyÂre basically in a full-scale panicÂ
|
|
Re:TheyÂre basically in a full-scale panic
http://bravenewclima...mple-explanation/
drl sent this Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 55 years. meep
|
|
I'm not so sanguine.
Bottom line: Until people get inside the reactor, we don't know how much stuff melted. But there clearly has been melting for cesium and iodine to be released. Melting of the fuel rods is a very bad thing.
http://en.wikipedia....Configuration.jpg from http://en.wikipedia....e_Island_accident Radioactive material release (Emphasis added.) If we're to believe the reports, radioactive cesium and iodine have already been detected in Japan, so one could infer that what has happened to the core is worse than what happened at TMI. That's just an inference at this point, though. I don't expect the steel reactor vessel to fail, but the folks who designed and who are working on the reactor obviously didn't expect to have so much trouble keeping it filled with water, either... In the near term, the longer this goes on without them being able to flood the core, the more risk there is of large radioactivity releases. Cheers, Scott. |
|
Counter to the prevailing hysteria:
Regards,
-scott Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson. |
|
I wish I was all-seeing like Lewis Page.
All reactors' temperature is now under control and the residual heat reactions inside them continue to die away; soon, no further cooling will be required. Hooray! That's why they're all going on long vacations now, I guess. Oh, wait... http://www.nytimes.c...15nuclear.html?hp The plantÂs operator, Tokyo Electric Power, said late Monday that efforts to inject seawater into the reactor had failed. Well that's comforting. They feel it's not imminent... :-/ We'll all have to wait and see, with fingers crossed, to see how this turns out. Cheers, Scott. |
|
there is a bed of graphite under the containment vessel
so even if it melts the floor it is not going anywhere
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 55 years. meep
|
|
It'll stop going down, but maybe not out in the air...
Hot things have a habit of ending up in the air when they're forced to cool down rapidly.
Again, I don't expect the containment vessel to fail in a major way, but there's still a significant chance of a lot of radioactivity being released. Everything isn't "under control" no matter how many nuclear engineers say there's nothing to worry about. Cheers, Scott. |
|
but there's still a significant chance of...
You dieing in the next 100 years.
Come on Scott... these weren't Russian Power Plants. There were designed by Anal Retentive Japanese Engineers and GE engineers that thought they were crazy for the over engineering they were doing. |
|
Yes, they're not exposed graphite piles.
Yes, the steel pressure vessel is probably going to hold. At least, mostly.
But they guys in Tokyo who are in "full-scale panic" are probably in a better position to know what's going on and how bad things are than a writer for TheReg in the UK. The plant is 40 years old. It doesn't have the latest safety measures that many later plants have. At least one reactor was scheduled to be shut down this month. Who knows whether some important maintenance was put off as being unnecessary or not cost-effective. http://en.wikipedia...._nuclear_accident Even anal-retentive engineers and maintenance technicians make mistakes. These TEPCO plants have had some issues in the past - http://www2.jnes.go...._power_index.html and http://www2.jnes.go...._power_index.html All commercial nuclear plants that have suffered major accidents have experienced things that the designers didn't intend or didn't consider. That's the nature of complex engineering projects. Perhaps the steel containment vessel will perform admirably for all of these at-risk reactors. I suspect and hope that they will. But I'm not at all pleased by all of the "everything's fine, it's working as designed, it's no big deal, what's everyone upset about" attitude in much of the reporting on this. This is a big deal and wasn't supposed to happen. The safety measures were supposed to ensure that the fuel rods didn't suffer from lack of coolant even in severe circumstances. The world needs to get off of burning stuff for power and transportation. Nuclear should probably have a larger role, but it's not at all clear to me that large-scale power reactors are the way to go. There comes a point where there are too many conceivable failure mechanisms that could result in large enough probability of vast contamination of the environment for the technology to be economically viable. The Shuttle solid-rocket booster O-rings had a 100% "safety margin" when they were half burned through, too... We know how that turned out. :-( The nuclear advocates out there in the press need to take what's happening to TEPCO's plants seriously. They shouldn't take the concerns as being fears of Luddites who don't know any better. If this disaster gets even a little bit worse, it may spell the end of commercial nuclear power plants in the democratic world. A substantial fraction of the population (and maybe a majority) has to support it for it to go forward, and they won't if there are continued explosions and stories in the press that the operators can't do what they say they need to do - no matter what people who "know better" say. "Who you gonna believe? Me, or your own lying eyes?" My $0.02. Cheers, Scott. |
|
Demonstrably, their major error re all the diesels was:
>> NOT putting the fuel tanks UNDERGROUND!<<
(As in US and most other places, I presume: this would seem to be a real Brain-Fart within an otherwise punctilious/conservative design approach elsewhere.) Tsunami is a Japanese word! and earthquakes are their daily bugaboo. Above-ground tanks supplying their BACKUP (only ONE! == another error) for the absolutely necessary mondo core-cooling pumps is, in hindsight: absolutely an inexcusable Duhh-grade oversight. Pity.. For those being queried about 'reactors', One more Time -- save your breath: here's a video by a avuncular Brit physicist, reviewing the BASICS, including the role of Boron in the control rods and various other simple concepts of the sort, always mangled by Murican-HS-edjakated talking heads, who majored in bizness. http://www.youtube.c...tch?v=-bcrLiATLq0 As to the 'mood' of Japanese boffins du jour; I seriously doubt that they are in panic-mode -- rather they are fully aware of what Might.. occur if even a few hasty/stupid actions were to be taken, next. Clearly the infusion of sea water has forever decommissioned each reactor where used: all SS parts shall have been corroded and filled with micro-cracks via Cl and other ions at v. high temps -- beyond any hope of salvage. Fortunately these reactors were already scheduled for denouement after 40 years of decent service. Concur that any Cs, I-131 etc. came from some spot in core where the Zr cladding had disintegrated (probable source point for voluminous H generation for the explosions) -- but How Many grams/kilos really did melt?? More disturbing is the inability to raise the sea-water level to cover fully the entire core == SOON. WHY?? It is almost unthinkable that there exists already a sizable hole at bottom of containment vessel, and surely they have opened other valves so that the incoming sea-water is not merely compressing any gases within -- that's the Q I want to see an answer to. Should be forthcoming within hours, I'd think. Luck to Nippon.. |
|
Well... okay, here goes.
The reason they are in Full panic mode... is that even though they *KNOW* what to do and have practiced it a bah-million time, its for real this time.
a Relevant but not close to scale case is this: The first time I had a REAL server down on my hands and I was 1500 miles away from (rather than 10 minutes driving), I was effectively nearly paralyzed with "How am I going to fix this?" The Latest one where a bad hard drive was swapped out (no problems there) and a new drive swapped in (lotsa problems there), caused SCSI bus errors all over the place... and then taking 4 hours to find the latent software bug... all in wanting to repair a Failed Drive in a mirrored array... Was calm and talking the whole way. Its a matter of being calm, cool, collected and well trained. That makes the big difference. Panic just doesn't make a situation good... anytime. |
|
More Lewis Page.
Regards,
-scott Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson. |
|
Evidently the panic is just that... Panic.
But I'm sure just like Lews, that people will scaremonger.
Heck the last core was completed in 1976. The ones around here are that old. Come on... lets all take a collectively sigh of relief... Huh AS? The whole Earthquake and Tsunami devastation has been largely ignored. The big story of that has been ignored. |
|
Local news has started berating the coverage.
For the last three days, ABC news reports have pointed out the greater problem of so many people homeless or just plain missing.
Wade. Q:Is it proper to eat cheeseburgers with your fingers? A:No, the fingers should be eaten separately. |
|
I wouldn't say "ignored"
There's lots of news every day in the places I read about the earthquake and tsunami aftermath. Not so much about many other important stories - like unemployment (as Krugman pointed out today).
The Fukushima story is big news because it may have direct world-wide impact, and because it is about an invisible danger (and thus is scarier). People can and do disagree about the extent of the risk - even within the nuclear field. Lewis's piece is yet again premature and over-sold. Nobody knows how much damage has been done to the plants. Nobody knows if the water pumps will work. Nobody knows the ultimate amount of radiation that will be released. (It took 4 years before they got a camera in the TMI core...) My $0.02. Cheers, Scott. |
|
I don't believe that was a sigh, Mr. F.
Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
|
|
Exactly.
Lewis' summary sentence, The prospect of any trouble at these reactors now seems remote. -- betrays his general incompetence to evaluate anything in this field.
And his reliance on PEPCO briefs indicates absence of a healthy skepticism of the company's press releases [for culture-based reasons] -- as has been pointed out in many more competent essays. Details Matter, each one -- like (as you mentioned earlier) ... the near-term results of all that sea water and its known debilitating effects on strength of steel/alloys of various kind PLUS the thermal insulating properties of the brine salts themselves! being deposited: exactly what you Don't want to have to deal with, given the decay curves of ALL those individual fuel rods, in-core or in-pools. Yeah, they might dodge this howitzer shell despite all those Damocles' swords, but it Ain't Over in the foreseeable, nor will there be a decent understanding of each reactor's denouement for years, if ever. (Better not take 4 years, in 2011, to get a fiber optic camera in there!) (And as somewhere else I read.. wtf Are?? the Rad-resistant Robots! given Japan's obsession with such things.) First robot would be modeled on a bulldozer, to clear a path for the specialized models. Etc. Sheesh ... ain't smug complacency A Bitch? |
|
Since you like Lewis so much...
Regards,
-scott Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson. |
|
Rofl. :-)
|
|
3rd explosion may have damaged a reactor vessel
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-12740843
The blast occurred at reactor 2 at the Fukushima Daiichi plant, which engineers had been trying to stabilise after two other reactors exploded. After the third explosion, officials said there were fears that the containment vessel housing the reactor may have been damaged. |
|
The more I read, the worse it sounds...
From 3/12:
http://www.scientifi...shima-core&page=2 "So there's some advantages to the BWR in terms of severe accidents. But one of the disadvantages is that the containment structure is a lightbulb-shaped steel shell that's only about 30 or 40 feet [nine to 12 meters] acrossÂthick steel, but relatively small compared to large, dry containments like TMI. And it doesn't provide as much of an extra layer of defense from reactor accidents as containments like TMI [do]. So there is a great deal of concern that if the core does melt, the containment will not be able to survive. And if the containment doesn't survive, we have a worst-case situation." Cheers, Scott. |
|
Fire engines
Can't find the link right now, but that is apparently how they are pumping the water in. It's also why one of the cores ended up getting uncovered: the pumper ran out of gas. The fire suppressing pumps of the turbine halls are also being used but some of those have been damaged by the explosions.
The worry is that they may not be able to source enough diesel to keep the pumps going due to the broken supply chain and shortages elsewhere. |
|
Yup.
http://english.chosu...011031500630.html
When the cooling system at the reactor broke down, TEPCO used fire engines to pump seawater into the reactor to cool the rods, but the pump malfunctioned, causing most of the fuel rods to be exposed. If exposed to air, fuel rods overheat and melt, releasing radioactive materials into the atmosphere. (I'd be surprised if it really came down to one person getting up to go to the toilet (or whatever).) NHK has an English page with information that is probably more timely than the big English news sites - http://www3.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/ Cheers, Scott. (Who wonders how much worse it will be in the morning...) |
|
More on GE BWR designs
http://taxdollars.oc...with-japan/77797/
UPDATED 03/14/11 at 3:00 PM with more details from the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear plant. Cheers, Scott. |
|
We're sitting on one
Local legislature is trying to shut it down, NRC and the operator are trying to get another 20 years out of it.
The scariest part about this one is that management is either totally incompetent or criminally negligent. Every word they utter is contradicted days later by something falling off the plant, springing a leak, etc. Managment has been running a FUD campaign for months now promising that our electrical rates will go through the roof if the plant is shut down. Most of their electricity goes out of state already, plus they were going to charge VT utilities more than a premium for the privilege of getting some. |
|
:-(
Nuclear plants run fine until they don't. :-(
I suspect those plants will be phased out sooner than the utilities want, but of course the rate payers will bear the brunt of the costs no matter what. Hang in there. Cheers, Scott. |
|
"It's worse than a meltdown"
http://www.nytimes.c.../asia/15fuel.html
Even as workers race to prevent the radioactive cores of the damaged nuclear reactors in Japan from melting down, concerns are growing that nearby pools holding spent fuel rods could pose an even greater danger. :-/ Cheers, Scott. (Who wonders if Lewis Page still feels that "Fukushima is a triumph for nuke power: Build more reactors now!") |
|
have you purchased the solar panels for your leccy car?
didnt think so
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 55 years. meep
|
|
Non sequitur
But you knew that.
:-) Cheers, Scott. |
|
Something is Strange here..
It is intuitively obvious even to a techno-illiterate: via bucket brigade, fire hoses or borrowed helicopters from US or other ships converging:
GET MORE WATER INTO THOSE POOLS, STAT! Talking doesn't cook the rice -- Shinto too, likely has an equivalent koan. And yes, some heroic overexposures, maybe to the 100 REM / I Sievert dose level are likely unavoidable. Many Pripyat folks made a larger sacrifice, fully aware of the ~440 REM MLD (median lethal whole-body dose) -- handling actual KiloRad-hot pieces with inadequate, up-close tools ... or gloved hands. [Unless, of course, they have run out of All Options re China Syndrome in-reactor probabilities, in their informed opinions.] Yet, considering the number of Mega-Curies of awfulness within that pool (adjacent to an empty reactor) -- consisting of n- core-loads of accumulated fission products: the storage pool still qualifies for all last-ditch efforts to submerge those suckers, even at $10/gallon delivery overhead. I don't understand this level of impotent inactivity, at all. |
|
It seems they can't.
Either they can't reduce the pressure in the reactors enough to pump water in, or there's a blockage, or there's a big leak. Or all 3.
What I picture happening is a combination of things: 1) There's hot fuel in the reactor because of a drop in water level. Some of the fuel rods have melted. 2) They vent the excess pressure, leading to even more water boiling away (lower pressure means easier boiling). 3) They pump in water, which instantly turns to steam when it contacts the hot fuel rods, increasing the pressure and making it more difficult to pump more water in. 4) Goto 2. What I haven't heard anyone talk about is: How effective are the control rods when they're embedded in molten fuel rods? Obviously, it's difficult for water to get to the center of a hot blob of metal, but isn't there also danger of some increased level of fission reactions starting up again since the control rods can't do their job? IOW, under normal circumstances the reactor cools down in a few days once it's been "scrammed". Does that still hold if the fuel rods have melted? My understanding is that the control rods "suck up" neutrons and stop the fission chain reaction by reducing the number below a self-sustaining level. But the control rods are designed to be a certain distance from the fuel, or in other words, the fuel rods are supposed to be a certain distance from their neighbors, to control the fission reaction. If everything's melted together, there's nothing to control the reaction (with the important caveat being lack of a moderator to slow the neutrons down), so even if the reaction won't be efficient, it can still heat up the fuel even more (more U atoms are closer together than designed), causing more melting, etc., etc. I haven't seen anyone talk about that, and it bothers me. In other accidents (TMI, the Fermi breeder outside Detroit), the core partially melted, so there must be some way (in principle) to prevent it from running away or staying hot for decades. But in those cases, 1) they weren't BWRs, and 2) they didn't suffer loss of coolant anywhere near as severe as some of these TEPCO reactors apparently have. How much of that history transfers here? I don't envy the folks working there. :-( Keep an eye on the prevailing winds, all of you West-Coasters.... :-( Cheers, Scott. |
|
drift chart
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 55 years. meep
|
|
Getting us back for WWII?
|
|
Well, if nuclear power isn't dead yet in the U.S. . . .
. . 750 rads on the coast of California will certainly do the job.
|
|
I didn't address the fuel storage areas before, obviously.
http://www3.nhk.or.j...nglish/16_05.html
TEPCO: Spraying water from air "difficult" TEPCO apparently presented a paper in November on how they do wet-storage and dry-storage of fuel bundles. http://www.nirs.org/...-1_powerpoint.pdf (26 page .pdf) Most of it is over my head, but it sounds like there's a lot of fuel being stored there, and they recently "upgraded" Fukushima-Daiichi Unit 1-6 to let them store even more... - Increase the capacity of spent fuel pools by re-racking Aye Carumba! :-( The wet storage facility is in slides 9-11. HTH. Cheers, Scott. |
|
Aye, TMI (info, not 3Mi-Island) of generic kind
-- way too little from which one can deduce useful things.
Understandably, the sorts of details we'd like some accurate info about just won't happen until in retrospect; neither time nor patience to bring in a sci-literate 'scribe + camera' to get the words out. Bring your own floodlights and lunch? Among the minefield of unknowns: whether the tsunami immersion so screwed up pumps, temp/px monitoring sensors, hyd. actuators and controllers -- that even were a US flattop to bring in a self-contained AC power unit via a huge Huey: Would much of the stuff and its controlling electronics still function? But how such things as, say the Px-relief valves in the torus? can be operated at all without AC power from Somewhere? -- I don't grok (either.) As to intermixed Boron and elephant feet blobs, it seems a mares nest of not-calculable cross-sections; if cooling of the blob-surfaces could.. be accomplished, then further neutron absorption could come from concentrated borate slurries, one supposes. No need to ponder moderators and spacings, I'd think: what you want is lots of the best n-absorbing substance available. By express Lear Jet. But this is rapidly ceasing to be an enviro where a robot could eat the Rads, even to haul a fire-hose end up to a steaming pool, given a debris-covered floor (We don't even know if any? many? of these pools' 'containment integrity' has been compromised) And it seems that TEPCO's workers/mgment have also PO'd the government minions, having failed to inform of the 6am-ish most recent fire, for some hours. Who's not leveling with whom? Apparently it was machine lube oil which was burning at #6 following the (alleged) release of nascent-H via water + overheated Zircalloy spent-rod cladding, that which caused that explosion. Watch and wait.. PS: NYT is collecting (intelligent) questions today, to be 'answered' tomorrow by whatever selection of boffins they have managed to corral: http://green.blogs.n...n-japan/?ref=asia Some noticed, appear to be al punte ... re several of those puntes. |
|
Thanks.
The BBC is reporting that a government spokesman said the 50 remaining workers are being withdrawn (Temporarily? Who knows...) due to excessively high radiation levels.
http://www.bbc.co.uk...-pacific-12755739 :-( Cheers, Scott. |
|
NYT answers to selected Qs submitted yesterday
http://green.blogs.n...-crisis-in-japan/
Seems to be in (expected) decent English, without garbling of concepts ... on a quick scan of replies. FWIW |
|
Good Q&A. Would be nice if more reporting was like that...
|
|
It's the spent fuel containment pools
I'm guessing the reactors are all cooling now, and they just need to wait till they cool enough. The problem now seems to be the containment pools for spent fuel. These pools are elevated above the reactor, so if the pools are damaged there isn't a simple way to fix it. They don't want to just dump water from above because the whole building might break up.
The fire at the number 4 reactor almost has to be burning fuel rods. That reactor was not only off-line but had the fuel rods removed from the reactor when the disaster hit, so the only thing there to be spewing radiation is the spent fuel rods. As ugly as it would be, I think they are going to have to ask for volunteers to go in and deal with it. They are going to need fire fighting crews and engineering teams to jury rig repairs. It's going to be a suicide mission, but it's probably the only way now. Jay |
|
Recommended news sites, etc.
http://www.jaif.or.j...vent-status-1.pdf - 1 page .PDF summary table from TEPCO.
http://mitnse.com/ - Clear, dispassionate descriptions of various happenings from MIT. http://english.kyodo...n_nuclear_crisis/ - Quick news summaries from Kyodo News in Japan. Can be a bit breathless. http://www3.nhk.or.j...nglish/index.html - NHK's English web page, a bit less breathless than Kyodo. http://www.world-nuclear-news.org - Seems to mostly aggregate news from other sources. http://bravenewclimate.com/ - Lots of 'nothing can go wrong' commentary mixed in with good technical information. http://en.wikipedia....clear_Power_Plant - An excellent, well-documented Wikipedia page. http://www.digitalgl...e+Imagery+Gallery - DigitalGlobe's sample satellite images of the Fukushima reactor complex, tsunami damage, etc. And their Flickr page - http://www.flickr.co...italglobe-imagery Some more details about the various fuel storage pools is in a 2 page .PDF at NEI - http://resources.nei...ols_Key_Facts.pdf If you haven't seen this picture from TEPCO, it might help explain the working conditions there. Reactor 3's building (on the left, reactor 4 is on the right) is a hulk now - http://resources2.ne...japan-reactor.jpg :-( (Many links via Brad DeLong's blog) Cheers, Scott. |
|
Plus, Bulletin Atom. Sci. chimes in
|
|
Thanks.
|
|
One more
http://www.demorgen.be
Yep, not in English ;-). The Live link has a minute by minute update log. The chunks are small enough for Google Translate. |
|
Reuters has something similar.
http://live.reuters....Japan_earthquake2
I find it too distracting when there are lots of updates, but I appreciate that they're doing it. Cheers, Scott. |
|
Some radiation levels.. and unit comparisons
http://www.nytimes.c...ion.html?ref=asia
As usual, a bit of a fubar in that the ordinate(y) axis seems to be indicated at right, implicitly also for some of the reference 'levels' -- but it's labelled 'millisieverts/hr' re. levels around the plant -- and the scripted refs refer to a dosage, NOT a rate. Correct via brain. As to the new zoo of furrin RAD equivalents, Grays, Sieverts -- all made clear at: http://www.stevequay...d.conversion.html Brief but al punte: explains RAD, REM, Gray and Sievert. And if it gets to a 'core dump' (no not IT) ... ... the unit will be the Curie, actually mega-that, in worst case. One Curie is 3.7 x 10 [E10] disintegrations/sec. That's ~ the disintegrations/sec for one Gram of Ra-226. All you need to remember is that 1 Sievert == 100 REM aka 'Röntgen Equivalent Man' -- which fiddles the difference between an air irradiated enviro and human meat's response to various particles or wavicles at their emitted energy. Nothing is really simple.. Hope there's some *boron* in those helicopter water drops ... ... |
|
The MIT NSE site has some good info, too.
It was off-line much of yesterday, but seems back up today.
http://mitnse.com/20...us-for-fukushima/ (It also has that NYTimes graph.) Some are saying (can't recall where) that the seawater drops, even if they're helping now (which isn't at all clear to me), eventually are going to stop working due to salt coating the fuel rods (hampering the cooling)... :-( Cheers, Scott. |
|
If still not suffering from tmi? Oildrum limns mondo links
with his selected comments
http://www.theoildrum.com/node/7669 But recent news of DRY! pools (or even just ONE == Adjacent Houses of Cards) ... words fail :-/// |
|
Somewhat related
Interactive map of Nuke sites and quake data:
http://reporting.sun...long-fault-lines/ |
|
The possibility of re-criticality is not zero
Ick! That would be the scariest LRPD quote ever...
http://www.bbc.co.uk...ironment-12762608 If you are in any doubt as to what this means, it is that in the company's view, it is possible that enough fissile uranium is present in the cooling pond in enough density to form a critical mass - meaning that a nuclear fission chain reaction could start. Apparently, the pools are overstuffed and the boron disappeared with the water. Now they're concerned that adding water may moderate neutron speed enough to restart fission. |
|
Yikes.
Given the way the fates have played with this plant over the last few days, one certainly can't rule much of anything out... :-(
Cheers, Scott. |
|
Japan raises incident threat level again
http://in.reuters.co...ia-55686820110318
The entry gave the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi site a level 5 rating, up from level 4 previously on a 1-7 scale. The threat level seems just a tad understated. A situation that is confirmed by the head of the US NCR giving a much bleaker assessment. http://www.nytimes.c...ear.html?ref=asia Mr. JaczkoÂs most startling assertion was that there was now little or no water in the pool storing spent nuclear fuel at the No. 4 reactor of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station, leaving fuel rods stored there exposed and bleeding radiation into the atmosphere. Jay |
|
NYTimes summary page of reactor and fuel storage status.
http://www.nytimes.c...rs-status.html?hp
Doesn't sound like its under control to me, but Lewis Page may read it differently... Cheers, Scott. |
|
Re TEPCO credibility
http://search.japant...nn20110319b1.html
Obviously, Murican corporations have no monopoly on greed-head coverups and dissembling; vulture capitalism seems to be the common thread wherever simple-Corruption is the daily MO of poorly- or un- regulated ethics-free enterprises. (As Charles Ferguson [Inside Job] queried, on a recent Commonwealth Club presentation on NPR: ~~ Where has any legal action yet been commenced re the provably-criminal activities (now increasingly documented) re top members of many of the US Finance corps??) ie. those which floated the scummiest of the faux-offerings / then bet against the crap they had sold their customers, apparently with AIG at the top of this odious heap, but the others contributing their own scams towards inevitable System Failure. Summary according to moi, just now: Anybody who thinks that the Worst.. at Fukushima has today been rendered impossible ... has been listening to uninformed wishful amateurs. IWErs of course, already Know what can go wrong go wrong with complex machines of the non-radioactive kind. I have my own tales of such machines and similar screwups with radiation producing devices of another sort than reactors. (At least, we could turn Ours OFF..) |
|
Japan Quake Map.
A neat web page showing the time and intensity (above 4.5M or so) of earthquakes around Japan since March 11 (11/03/11). (651 is the total number at the moment.)
http://www.japanquakemap.com/ Start with March 11 (around midnight) and watch carefully.... Wow. :-( Cheers, Scott. |
|
Wow! what a clever, informative scary piece of work..
(Tufte would be proud, natch.)
This looks to be built by same folks who made an earlier encountered radiological map I came across. (Wherein the prefectures with blank/violet #s, adjacent to Fuku'shima, were labeled 'Surveying-(something)') And within the sidebar was mentioned, "== censored" -- as explanation!! Honest duplicity; is Murican corruption half-way there? Would like to see a similar animation re our local Fault (Rodgers) ... which is never inactive, but they're all small. So far.. Does this not suggest prompting a local habit twixt geologists and meeja, to cover similarly our many Faults -- escalating the notice.. where groans are becoming almost audible? Yeah.. who'll pay for that / and by running what kind of Ads? Never mind. |
|
Not quite the same, but the USGS has ANSS
http://quake.geo.ber.../seismograms.html
http://earthquake.us....39.-123.-121.php UC Berkeley info - http://quake.geo.ber.../seismograms.html HTH. :-) Cheers, Scott. |
|
Thanks.. looking.
Developer of above map and the Christchurch NZ original: Paul Nicholls of NZ
http://www.elm.cante...le/nicholls.shtml |
|
Bulletin. At. Sci. daily reports
http://www.thebullet...aily-update-japan
(Previous days' reports below that, plus some essays free to non-subscribers are available.) 50 RADS/hr emissions, though unstated is Where in Unit 3, like -?- the control room or 2" from the primary enclosure? The beat goes on.. with UNIX MAN-style factoids emitted sans elaboration. Confidence-inspiring. |
|
Thanks.
|
|
Latest on Fukushima from the NYTimes.
http://www.nytimes.c...lear.html?_r=1&hp
Richard T. Lahey Jr., who was General ElectricÂs chief of safety research for boiling-water reactors when the company installed them at the Fukushima Daiichi plant, said that as seawater was pumped into the reactors and boiled away, it left more and more salt behind. This is a long way from being over. Unfortunately. :-( Naturally, Mr. Page's latest missive (from Tuesday) continues to put the best possible spin on events there - http://www.theregist...ushima_tuesday_2/ ... Cheers, Scott. |