It's 7.3

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #33,910 by lordbeatnik 3/31/02 11:21:51 AM Reply	It's 7.3 The rumor I heard was that they were having trouble converting to compiling with their version of gcc 3.1 so they've decided to do another 7.x release while they let 8.0 slip. David "LordBeatnik"
Post #33,920 by folkert 3/31/02 12:45:19 PM Reply	Well... at least rumors are... Rumors, I heard the same thing. But it was another dead branch of gcc v3.0something. But we get the picture. Alot of other things didn't show up that I'd expected either... Like newer LOTSA things... as I am forced to update somethings for some products we run. Oh, well, another revision, some more job security!!! ;) `greg, curley95@attbi.com -- REMEMBER ED CURRY!!! Keep software free. Oppose the CBDTPA. Kill S.2048 dead. [link\|http://www.eff.org/alerts/20020322_eff_cbdtpa_alert.html\|[link\|http://www.eff.org/alerts/20020322_eff_cbdtpa_alert.html\|http://www.eff.org/...a_alert.html]]`
Post #33,960 by broomberg 3/31/02 11:14:03 PM Reply	On the last 6 RPMs What should I expect to miss? Other than the fact it didn't pick up my mouse and made me go through text install? I suspect I fried my MB on a hot mouse plug. It's OK, I have a stack more to try later.

Red Hat 8.0 Beta - (a6l6e6x) - (5) - March 30, 2002, 10:37:26 PM EST

Ooops... You mean 7.3.... - (folkert) - (4) - March 30, 2002, 11:35:37 PM EST

Re: Ooops... You mean 7.3.... - (a6l6e6x) - (3) - March 30, 2002, 11:43:05 PM EST

It's 7.3 - (lordbeatnik) - (2) - March 31, 2002, 11:21:51 AM EST

Well... at least rumors are... - (folkert) - (1) - March 31, 2002, 12:45:19 PM EST

On the last 6 RPMs - (broomberg) - March 31, 2002, 11:14:03 PM EST

It is generally inadvisable to eject directly over the area you just bombed.
73 ms