IWETHEY v. 0.3.0
|
TODO
1,095 registered users | 0
active users
| 0 LpH |
Statistics
Login
|
Create New User
Welcome to IWETHEY!
IWETHEY Home
/
IWETHEY Board
/
General Q&A Forum
/
I was thinking that last as well. Must be something subtle.
Post #333,614
by
Another Scott
10/3/10 11:22:14 AM
Reply
I was thinking that last as well. Must be something subtle.
Hmmm . . . this is interesting: Safari and Chrome . . .
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (40)
- Sept. 26, 2010, 10:35:33 PM EDT
What's really interesting...
- (
malraux
)
- (11)
- Sept. 26, 2010, 11:00:10 PM EDT
Thanks, I'll give that a try . . .
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (3)
- Sept. 26, 2010, 11:23:22 PM EDT
Different Scott... ;-)
- (
malraux
)
- (2)
- Sept. 26, 2010, 11:30:19 PM EDT
Were you using a Mac?
-NT
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (1)
- Sept. 26, 2010, 11:49:05 PM EDT
Yes.
-NT
- (
malraux
)
- Sept. 27, 2010, 09:18:43 AM EDT
Timing issues, huh?
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (6)
- Sept. 27, 2010, 01:21:47 AM EDT
Not just speed
- (
drook
)
- (5)
- Sept. 27, 2010, 09:54:09 AM EDT
And there are quite a few of those on that page
- (
scoenye
)
- (4)
- Sept. 28, 2010, 07:09:26 PM EDT
I've been over and over my nesting and closings . . .
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (3)
- Sept. 28, 2010, 09:36:45 PM EDT
Try the validator
- (
drook
)
- (2)
- Sept. 28, 2010, 10:42:48 PM EDT
Not so much unbalanced nesting
- (
scoenye
)
- Sept. 28, 2010, 11:01:52 PM EDT
Yeah, a lot of values are not quoted . . .
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- Sept. 29, 2010, 01:12:03 AM EDT
Typo - "North American. buyers"
-NT
- (
Another Scott
)
- Sept. 26, 2010, 11:00:55 PM EDT
Conclusion: Safari (Win) can't render W3C validated code.
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (26)
- Oct. 3, 2010, 02:47:06 AM EDT
Interesting..
- (
Ashton
)
- Oct. 3, 2010, 04:07:02 AM EDT
Re: Conclusion: Safari (Win) can't render W3C validated code
- (
mvitale
)
- Oct. 3, 2010, 09:28:09 AM EDT
Still shifted.
- (
malraux
)
- (7)
- Oct. 3, 2010, 11:16:55 AM EDT
I was thinking that last as well. Must be something subtle.
-NT
- (
Another Scott
)
- Oct. 3, 2010, 11:22:14 AM EDT
I have done the div thing mvitale suggested.
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (5)
- Oct. 3, 2010, 11:57:49 AM EDT
Quick thought: Possible font substitutions?
- (
Another Scott
)
- (1)
- Oct. 3, 2010, 12:04:06 PM EDT
Re: Quick thought: Possible font substitutions?
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- Oct. 3, 2010, 12:11:04 PM EDT
Works.
- (
malraux
)
- (2)
- Oct. 3, 2010, 12:10:51 PM EDT
It doesn't work for the other formatting problems though.
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (1)
- Oct. 3, 2010, 12:34:07 PM EDT
Not a fix, a replacement.
-NT
- (
malraux
)
- Oct. 3, 2010, 12:52:05 PM EDT
weird issues
- (
SpiceWare
)
- (8)
- Oct. 3, 2010, 01:49:16 PM EDT
Somebody updated it
- (
SpiceWare
)
- (7)
- Oct. 5, 2010, 11:19:55 AM EDT
Yup, and a "reduced test case" . . .
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (6)
- Oct. 5, 2010, 12:05:46 PM EDT
Well, if you can't fix the problem, fix the spec :-(
-NT
- (
hnick
)
- Oct. 5, 2010, 02:10:47 PM EDT
I can try to reduce it
- (
SpiceWare
)
- (4)
- Oct. 5, 2010, 02:47:41 PM EDT
Oh, I can reduce it very easily, but . . .
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (3)
- Oct. 5, 2010, 04:58:43 PM EDT
And here it is.
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (2)
- Oct. 5, 2010, 11:11:07 PM EDT
On a Mac
- (
Ashton
)
- Oct. 6, 2010, 02:09:06 AM EDT
Display at 1149 pixels wide...
- (
folkert
)
- Oct. 6, 2010, 07:34:39 AM EDT
Just thought of something
- (
drook
)
- (5)
- Oct. 3, 2010, 09:26:25 PM EDT
Yep.
- (
malraux
)
- Oct. 3, 2010, 10:50:07 PM EDT
Standard but deprecated
- (
scoenye
)
- Oct. 3, 2010, 11:08:00 PM EDT
I have specified doctype 4.1 transitional . . .
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (2)
- Oct. 4, 2010, 12:21:46 AM EDT
One way to consistently clear it...
- (
scoenye
)
- (1)
- Oct. 4, 2010, 10:41:59 PM EDT
Re: "One way to consistently clear it...
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- Oct. 4, 2010, 11:54:05 PM EDT
"Web Browser v2.30.2" or Epiphany...
- (
folkert
)
- Oct. 3, 2010, 10:45:51 PM EDT
i
we
they
.org
And let's have a little taste of that old computer-generated... swagger... yes.
98 ms