IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New I don't have any problems with this
and frankly it didn't change much...except shutting down double cycle billing. And again, anyone that signed up for a card that used double cycle didn't read the agreement. They were too happy to send away for that card that guaranteed they would be accepted.

Who's fault is it if I'm a sucker?

I did like the minimum gift card life though.
Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
New You didn't answer: As long as they disclose, it's Ok?
New Too broad, so no.
Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
New But I thought you liked digital think?
--

Drew
New If that is your attempt at a dig
...it missed.

Not a fan of "gotcha" posts...

And I had already stated getting rid of double cycle billing was a good thing.. So no, the blanket of "as long as they disclose, its ok" didn't even hold to my existing post.

That does NOT change the fact that anybody who signed on to a card program like that (and double cycle billing was disclosed) was an fool and that fool and his money were soon parted.
Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
New So now I'm confused
on your stance, other than you are annoyed and foaming a bit, but I don't know what you are annoyed about.

Is there something in the new law that annoys you?

If so, what?

If not, what the hell are you annoyed about?
     What, $4 for ATM transactions isn't enough - (beepster) - (27)
         Gosh.. what's the tab for Bizness-as-U$UAL?? -NT - (Ashton) - (1)
             Gosh, what could that tab be for regulation done right? -NT - (beepster)
         So what? - (crazy) - (24)
             So instead of charging usury rates for cc... - (beepster) - (23)
                 How many bankrupcies? - (mhuber)
                 Yes, it is - (crazy) - (21)
                     All solved by... - (beepster) - (20)
                         Which fine print? - (mhuber) - (3)
                             No, they didn't - (beepster) - (2)
                                 Please detail the cost to "cancel" - (crazy) - (1)
                                     You're cherry picking the wrong guy. - (beepster)
                         No it's not - (crazy) - (15)
                             The side I'm on - (beepster) - (14)
                                 It's not mine - (drook) - (6)
                                     Its not finance - (beepster) - (1)
                                         Digital thinking ... isn't -NT - (drook)
                                     He's close to right - (crazy) - (3)
                                         So why do I have to be content.. - (beepster) - (2)
                                             Because there are a lot more of them than you - (crazy) - (1)
                                                 So now they were killing people? - (beepster)
                                 As long as they disclose, it's Ok? - (Another Scott) - (6)
                                     I don't have any problems with this - (beepster) - (5)
                                         You didn't answer: As long as they disclose, it's Ok? -NT - (Another Scott) - (3)
                                             Too broad, so no. -NT - (beepster) - (2)
                                                 But I thought you liked digital think? -NT - (drook) - (1)
                                                     If that is your attempt at a dig - (beepster)
                                         So now I'm confused - (crazy)

You know nothing of this if they ask you...
340 ms