IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Money, Financials, and Economics Forum / I don't have any problems with this
Post #332,819
by beepster
9/19/10 11:22:50 PM
Reply
New I don't have any problems with this
and frankly it didn't change much...except shutting down double cycle billing. And again, anyone that signed up for a card that used double cycle didn't read the agreement. They were too happy to send away for that card that guaranteed they would be accepted.

Who's fault is it if I'm a sucker?

I did like the minimum gift card life though.
Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
Post #332,824
by Another Scott
9/20/10 7:23:30 AM
Reply
New You didn't answer: As long as they disclose, it's Ok?
Post #332,828
by beepster
9/20/10 8:25:44 AM
Reply
New Too broad, so no.
Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
Post #332,838
by drook
Picture of drook
9/20/10 4:17:03 PM
Reply
New But I thought you liked digital think?
--

Drew
Post #332,840
by beepster
9/20/10 4:42:27 PM
Reply
New If that is your attempt at a dig
...it missed.

Not a fan of "gotcha" posts...

And I had already stated getting rid of double cycle billing was a good thing.. So no, the blanket of "as long as they disclose, its ok" didn't even hold to my existing post.

That does NOT change the fact that anybody who signed on to a card program like that (and double cycle billing was disclosed) was an fool and that fool and his money were soon parted.
Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
Post #332,825
by crazy
9/20/10 7:25:54 AM
Reply
New So now I'm confused
on your stance, other than you are annoyed and foaming a bit, but I don't know what you are annoyed about.

Is there something in the new law that annoys you?

If so, what?

If not, what the hell are you annoyed about?
     What, $4 for ATM transactions isn't enough - (beepster) - (27) - Sept. 15, 2010, 01:32:29 PM EDT
         Gosh.. what's the tab for Bizness-as-U$UAL?? -NT - (Ashton) - (1) - Sept. 15, 2010, 04:00:02 PM EDT
             Gosh, what could that tab be for regulation done right? -NT - (beepster) - Sept. 15, 2010, 04:24:01 PM EDT
         So what? - (crazy) - (24) - Sept. 17, 2010, 05:08:56 PM EDT
             So instead of charging usury rates for cc... - (beepster) - (23) - Sept. 17, 2010, 11:35:30 PM EDT
                 How many bankrupcies? - (mhuber) - Sept. 18, 2010, 12:31:02 AM EDT
                 Yes, it is - (crazy) - (21) - Sept. 18, 2010, 07:40:31 PM EDT
                     All solved by... - (beepster) - (20) - Sept. 18, 2010, 11:08:48 PM EDT
                         Which fine print? - (mhuber) - (3) - Sept. 19, 2010, 02:53:13 AM EDT
                             No, they didn't - (beepster) - (2) - Sept. 19, 2010, 11:01:09 AM EDT
                                 Please detail the cost to "cancel" - (crazy) - (1) - Sept. 19, 2010, 11:45:17 AM EDT
                                     You're cherry picking the wrong guy. - (beepster) - Sept. 19, 2010, 11:58:08 AM EDT
                         No it's not - (crazy) - (15) - Sept. 19, 2010, 08:18:45 AM EDT
                             The side I'm on - (beepster) - (14) - Sept. 19, 2010, 11:55:33 AM EDT
                                 It's not mine - (drook) - (6) - Sept. 19, 2010, 12:43:41 PM EDT
                                     Its not finance - (beepster) - (1) - Sept. 19, 2010, 11:14:37 PM EDT
                                         Digital thinking ... isn't -NT - (drook) - Sept. 20, 2010, 12:32:17 AM EDT
                                     He's close to right - (crazy) - (3) - Sept. 20, 2010, 07:19:08 AM EDT
                                         So why do I have to be content.. - (beepster) - (2) - Sept. 20, 2010, 08:21:47 AM EDT
                                             Because there are a lot more of them than you - (crazy) - (1) - Sept. 20, 2010, 09:44:46 AM EDT
                                                 So now they were killing people? - (beepster) - Sept. 20, 2010, 10:08:54 AM EDT
                                 As long as they disclose, it's Ok? - (Another Scott) - (6) - Sept. 19, 2010, 12:45:31 PM EDT
                                     I don't have any problems with this - (beepster) - (5) - Sept. 19, 2010, 11:22:50 PM EDT
                                         You didn't answer: As long as they disclose, it's Ok? -NT - (Another Scott) - (3) - Sept. 20, 2010, 07:23:30 AM EDT
                                             Too broad, so no. -NT - (beepster) - (2) - Sept. 20, 2010, 08:25:44 AM EDT
                                                 But I thought you liked digital think? -NT - (drook) - (1) - Sept. 20, 2010, 04:17:03 PM EDT
                                                     If that is your attempt at a dig - (beepster) - Sept. 20, 2010, 04:42:27 PM EDT
                                         So now I'm confused - (crazy) - Sept. 20, 2010, 07:25:54 AM EDT

Chinese Bookmarks of DOOM!
179 ms