IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Re: Let's see.
i would be satisfied that every household have reasonable access to food and water, we aint there yet. Socialist much?
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 55 years. meep
New ...
New So you're in favour of letting people starve to death?
Because not to do so would be "socialist". (If that's not how to read what you wrote, then what is?) You do realise, I hope, that the opposite of "socialist", in that case, seems to be "utter arsehole".

But the Other Scott of course said all that so much more elegantly than I... Because all the above is exactly what his "..." meant, I am willing to wager.

And to think I accused poor *BeeP* of being a Rush-head...!
New point=missed
I am concerned that people have access to adequate food and water, in america some people do go to bed hungry (if they have a bed) Scott is concerned that these hungry people get broadband.
Unca Joe Steele was a socialist, he loved them kulaks
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 55 years. meep
Expand Edited by boxley Sept. 15, 2010, 12:43:09 PM EDT
New Considering that you are {unnaturally!} oft better-informed
about the hysterical soap opera which Murican 'politics' always is:
I doubt that you are surprised that our 'Social Security' ... ie. the very Idea that there should Be Such a Thing
-- is currently under attack by various reactionary groupings (merely for having the concept 'social' anywhere around it.)

And such fulminations are (see Russ Feingold matters) successfully beating-out re-electable long-time non-lunatic seat holders,
in preparation for the verbal diarrhea to accompany {{shudder}} the little dances to be held in November.

Now I know what you're thinking:
IF'n 'They' replace living-breathing humans with such pod-people droids, aren't they Shooting-in-gonads
-- the Party (they have devoured into irrelevance) -- to the benefit of the Opposition?
Yeah, one might think so, but this be Murica 2010.

(Let the shuddering commence early, so those muscles will be strong enough to bear the November Shudders in all sentient onlookers.)


Carrion

PS -- welcome back from the Void!





I could almost see voting for Palin in 2012 on the grounds that this sorry ratfucking excuse for a republic, this savage, smirking, predatory empire deserves her. Bring on the Rapture, motherfuckers!
-- via RC
     its acorns fault - (boxley) - (51)
         Let's see if I follow this - (drook) - (50)
             you got it :-) - (boxley)
             Not necessarily - (beepster) - (48)
                 I don't see it - (drook) - (43)
                     Where you stand depends on where you sit - (crazy) - (40)
                         who is paying the bill? - (boxley) - (39)
                             Doesn't Net Neutrality help customers? - (drook) - (38)
                                 or... - (folkert) - (37)
                                     it isnt, and they would lose you as a customer to a telco - (boxley) - (36)
                                         Why would the other be any better? - (drook) - (35)
                                             why do you think that is the plan? - (boxley) - (34)
                                                 NAF's comments. - (Another Scott) - (33)
                                                     correct - (boxley) - (8)
                                                         I get my email from my web host, not my ISP - (drook) - (7)
                                                             Ditto. We've never checked our e-mail on our Cox account. -NT - (Another Scott)
                                                             whoosh, point=missed - (boxley) - (5)
                                                                 Is that what it means? Really? - (drook)
                                                                 Specious argument. - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                                                     so downloading porn == telephone service. okay -NT - (boxley)
                                                                 QOS is NOT the issue here. - (folkert) - (1)
                                                                     bullshit greg, you know better - (boxley)
                                                     Oh, cool, code words... - (beepster) - (23)
                                                         It *is* telecom - (drook) - (22)
                                                             Doesn't mean... - (beepster) - (21)
                                                                 You don't like the USF. Now tell me why it's not a telecom. -NT - (drook) - (20)
                                                                     doesnt use the AIN so its not a telecom, no a-links needed - (boxley) - (4)
                                                                         Verizon says you're wrong - (drook) - (3)
                                                                             federal court said you are wrong, they should know - (boxley) - (2)
                                                                                 Have you read Brand X? - (drook) - (1)
                                                                                     hafta take this offline if you are really interested -NT - (boxley)
                                                                     I didn't say it wasn't telecom - (beepster) - (14)
                                                                         Sure, it's all about TAXes. As always. Sure... :-/ -NT - (Another Scott) - (13)
                                                                             Is that NOT what you think - (beepster) - (12)
                                                                                 Let's see. - (Another Scott) - (11)
                                                                                     Re: Let's see. - (boxley) - (4)
                                                                                         ... -NT - (Another Scott)
                                                                                         So you're in favour of letting people starve to death? - (CRConrad) - (2)
                                                                                             point=missed - (boxley)
                                                                                             Considering that you are {unnaturally!} oft better-informed - (Ashton)
                                                                                     Let's see, part B - (drook)
                                                                                     So who will pay - (beepster) - (4)
                                                                                         you already did, part of the stimulus package -NT - (boxley) - (3)
                                                                                             But I also pay - (beepster) - (2)
                                                                                                 Poor beepster ... could your taxes be so onerous - (Ashton) - (1)
                                                                                                     bwah ha ha - (beepster)
                     Given rulings on fair use and other new technologies - (beepster) - (1)
                         We already know what the Telcos et al want to do - (drook)
                 Any law at all == totalitarianism - (mhuber) - (3)
                     ;^> ... [© CRC. He says.] -NT - (Ashton) - (2)
                         Bet I got it from someone. I only introduced it to IWT. ^_^ -NT - (CRConrad) - (1)
                             Nice to see you stop by again. - (folkert)

You entered famous last wordsburg territory thinking along that line.
74 ms