IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Paula wasn't the alleged rapee if I remember correctly
Wasn't Paula the one who was merely harassed when the then-governor dropped his pants in front of him?

Damn, I must be going liberal and non-conspiratorial, I've lost track of the playing pieces.
"I didn't know you could drive to Europe." -- An eavesdropper, piping in when he overheard a conversation about someone who had driven to Montreal.
New Yup.
That's why I said "editing".

And the judge ruled that, if he HAD done that, it would NOT have been "sexual assault".

And I'm sure that any lawyer anywhere would have the knowledge to see that.

But she was being pushed by the Republican witch hunt and "sexual assault" charges sound so much more...........sinister? damaging? MEDIA WORTHY? than just dropping his pants.

So, poor (or intended) editing makes a dull story much more interesting.

Otherwise, poor Marlowe might not find it worthy of linking to here.
     NOW took the money and looked the other way - (marlowe) - (4)
         *sigh* editing. - (Brandioch) - (3)
             Paula wasn't the alleged rapee if I remember correctly - (wharris2) - (1)
                 Yup. - (Brandioch)
             Brock's new book explains Paula. - (mmoffitt)

Check out Elimidate.. but not right after a meal, OK?
93 ms