Re: Excellent. I should have rememberd that. Thanks.

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #329,769 by folkert 7/17/10 2:20:16 PM Reply	Re: Excellent. I should have rememberd that. Thanks. doing a "wget" of the webserver on one of those IPs produces this: [Reference] Ref1=http://64.215.158.101/?MSWMExt=.asf Ref2=http://64.215.158.101:80/?MSWMExt=.asf I believe its a set of reflectors for a video stream. At least that is what it looks like to me. Porn site producers use them a lot... AS? What should we think now?
Post #329,771 by Another Scott 7/17/10 2:32:25 PM Reply	That shouldn't be it. ;-)
Post #329,796 by mvitale 7/17/10 10:03:33 PM Reply	Re: Excellent. I should have rememberd that. Thanks. Porn site producers use them a lot... AS? What should we think now? We should think that you know more about what porn sites do than AScott does. ;-) -Mike "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin, 1759 Historical Review of Pennsylvania
Post #329,806 by drook 7/18/10 9:22:33 AM Reply	Dang, beat me to it -- Drew

Is it just me? Fast Company's "Influence" thingy. - (Another Scott) - (19) - July 14, 2010, 07:35:37 AM EDT

SBS&D didn't find anything. - (Another Scott) - (9) - July 14, 2010, 08:04:11 AM EDT

Try Wireshark? - (mvitale) - (7) - July 14, 2010, 08:08:45 AM EDT

Ok, I've captured some traffic. Now what? - (Another Scott) - (6) - July 17, 2010, 10:02:24 AM EDT

Re: Ok, I've captured some traffic. Now what? - (mvitale) - (5) - July 17, 2010, 12:18:34 PM EDT

Excellent. I should have rememberd that. Thanks. -NT - (Another Scott) - (4) - July 17, 2010, 11:43:36 AM EDT

Re: Excellent. I should have rememberd that. Thanks. - (folkert) - (3) - July 17, 2010, 02:20:16 PM EDT

That shouldn't be it. ;-) -NT - (Another Scott) - July 17, 2010, 02:32:25 PM EDT

Re: Excellent. I should have rememberd that. Thanks. - (mvitale) - (1) - July 17, 2010, 10:03:33 PM EDT

Dang, beat me to it -NT - (drook) - July 18, 2010, 09:22:33 AM EDT

check your plug-in directory - (beepster) - July 14, 2010, 08:50:07 AM EDT

you have a new plugin - (boxley) - July 14, 2010, 09:22:50 AM EDT

Hmm, wasn't aware of that - (drook) - July 14, 2010, 11:42:27 AM EDT

Probably coincidence. - (Another Scott) - (1) - July 14, 2010, 12:27:03 PM EDT

Update. - (Another Scott) - July 15, 2010, 07:22:43 AM EDT

As you might expect, it was a false alarm. - (Another Scott) - (4) - July 25, 2010, 10:48:38 PM EDT

Yeah.. that rotating thingi appears oblivious to some common - (Ashton) - July 26, 2010, 01:53:34 AM EDT

72 tabs? when you can see at most 10 at a whack? -NT - (boxley) - (2) - July 26, 2010, 09:15:53 AM EDT

Something like that. - (Another Scott) - (1) - July 26, 2010, 09:54:22 AM EDT

I ended up having firefox get... - (folkert) - July 26, 2010, 10:16:43 AM EDT

Ohh... they're still working.
120 ms