Indeed, the observable universe is far too small to contain an ordinary digital representation of Graham's number, assuming that each digit occupies at least one Planck volume.
Nice find. Thanks.
Cheers,
Scott.
Graham's Number
- (pwhysall)
- (4)
- June 22, 2010, 03:15:38 PM EDT
Heh. :-)
- (Another Scott)
- June 22, 2010, 03:34:04 PM EDT
I've stumbled on that before.
- (static)
- June 22, 2010, 08:32:09 PM EDT
$10^185 and 99 cents
- (Ashton)
- June 23, 2010, 03:20:51 PM EDT
Poor sod must never get called for a date with a # like that
-NT
- (Meerkat)
- June 26, 2010, 09:44:02 PM EDT