IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Naked Short Selling
What you describe is normal short selling. The recent innovation that has turned many people against shorts is naked short selling.

In this case you sell stock even though you don't have it. You can do this because the market rules gives you a certain amount of time to actually turn over the stock. This time window, for historical reasons back when the exchange involved actual paper stock, is actually several days. Normal sales are all electronic now and usually done within fractions of seconds.

This form of short selling lets the short sellers drive the price of a stock down. By pumping their non-existent stock sales into the market they increase supply and reduce demand. This pushes the price down, making it possible for them to buy at a lower price and make money.

My opinion is that short selling is a valid, if risky, form of investment. Naked short selling is a form of market manipulation.

Jay
New Great point
It's not just gambling.
Naked short selling is a form of market manipulation.
--

Drew
Expand Edited by drook June 18, 2010, 01:22:58 PM EDT
     how the bailout screwed investors - (boxley) - (29)
         Selling Short isn't Investing, they're Speculating. HTH. -NT - (Another Scott) - (27)
             Yeah, sure didn't sound like "average investors" to me. -NT - (Andrew Grygus)
             WTF its not a naked short? - (boxley) - (25)
                 No - (drook) - (24)
                     Well said. Thanks. -NT - (Another Scott) - (23)
                         without looking post what stocks in your 401k have dividends -NT - (boxley) - (22)
                             More words, please. - (Another Scott) - (21)
                                 investing is gambling - (boxley) - (4)
                                     False dichotomy - (drook)
                                     Unpersuasive. - (Another Scott) - (2)
                                         so you are happy that the fed - (boxley) - (1)
                                             The Fed could have and should do better. - (Another Scott)
                                 It is certainly investing - (beepster) - (15)
                                     Why does that matter? - (drook)
                                     Ummmm . . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (13)
                                         Not only that, but... - (Another Scott) - (10)
                                             fer cryin out loud. - (boxley) - (9)
                                                 ... yerself. - (Another Scott)
                                                 Short selling isn't "selling" - (Andrew Grygus) - (7)
                                                     no, you're talking puts and calls - (beepster) - (6)
                                                         You're expanding the definition of gambling - (drook) - (5)
                                                             no different than playing slot machines - (boxley) - (4)
                                                                 Then Drook owns a piece of the company. What does Box own? -NT - (Another Scott) - (2)
                                                                     piece of dirt that I can build on, value added services -NT - (boxley) - (1)
                                                                         From playing the slots? Then Tyche is smiling upon you. -NT - (Another Scott)
                                                                 *Trading* stocks is zero-sum, just like slot machines - (drook)
                                         Naked Short Selling - (jay) - (1)
                                             Great point - (drook)
         Eric Cantor is short US Treasuries - (Another Scott)

Cue the Twilight Zone Music, will ya?
56 ms