IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 1 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Re: Your malpractice numbers don't make sense.
Some numbers from a 2005 article (And a partial reason for why they are so high):
Malpractice insurance premiums vary widely from state to state. Florida is the highest-premium state, with an average 2004 premium of more than $195,000, followed by Nevada, Michigan, the District of Columbia, Ohio, Massachusetts, West Virginia, Connecticut, Illinois and New York.

The 10 lowest-premium states are Oklahoma, at about $17,000 on average, and Nebraska, South Dakota, Minnesota, Indiana, Idaho, North Dakota, Wisconsin, Arkansas and South Carolina.
...
The reasons for the rising costs in this specialty are myriad, but Ransom notes that a partial explanation is that “everybody wants and expects a perfect baby,” leading many people to sue when the reality doesn't match their expectation.


http://www.med.umich...ge/2005/obgyn.htm
New Thanks.
     nother and Jake care to comment? - (boxley) - (20)
         Deep pockets, insurance, damages, device mfgs and pharma. - (folkert) - (19)
             Who defines what "real" is? - (beepster) - (1)
                 Not talking about Early Patent stuff. - (folkert)
             how did torte reform work in texas and alaska - (boxley) - (4)
                 Don't see where your posts - (beepster) - (3)
                     Texas has torte reform as well as alaska - (boxley) - (2)
                         Actually, thinking he means - (beepster) - (1)
                             which is then passed to the consumer - (boxley)
             Your malpractice numbers don't make sense. - (Another Scott) - (11)
                 What, you think... - (beepster) - (8)
                     Yes, that's *exactly* what I think. Of course. :-/ - (Another Scott) - (7)
                         Are you talking about insurance rate,,, - (beepster) - (6)
                             I made an assumption. - (Another Scott)
                             What's the opposite of "benefit of the doubt"? - (drook) - (4)
                                 When you state it that clearly - (Ashton)
                                 ok dad;=) -NT - (beepster) - (2)
                                     Damn whippersnapper -NT - (drook) - (1)
                                         Well HE started it! - (beepster)
                 Re: Your malpractice numbers don't make sense. - (altmann) - (1)
                     Thanks. -NT - (Another Scott)

Welcome to those that can stand it.
105 ms