IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 1 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Actually, thinking he means
the cost of insurance for the DOCTOR will be cheaper, not for the patient.
I will choose a path that's clear. I will choose freewill.
New which is then passed to the consumer
which should result in all around lowered cost.
     nother and Jake care to comment? - (boxley) - (20)
         Deep pockets, insurance, damages, device mfgs and pharma. - (folkert) - (19)
             Who defines what "real" is? - (beepster) - (1)
                 Not talking about Early Patent stuff. - (folkert)
             how did torte reform work in texas and alaska - (boxley) - (4)
                 Don't see where your posts - (beepster) - (3)
                     Texas has torte reform as well as alaska - (boxley) - (2)
                         Actually, thinking he means - (beepster) - (1)
                             which is then passed to the consumer - (boxley)
             Your malpractice numbers don't make sense. - (Another Scott) - (11)
                 What, you think... - (beepster) - (8)
                     Yes, that's *exactly* what I think. Of course. :-/ - (Another Scott) - (7)
                         Are you talking about insurance rate,,, - (beepster) - (6)
                             I made an assumption. - (Another Scott)
                             What's the opposite of "benefit of the doubt"? - (drook) - (4)
                                 When you state it that clearly - (Ashton)
                                 ok dad;=) -NT - (beepster) - (2)
                                     Damn whippersnapper -NT - (drook) - (1)
                                         Well HE started it! - (beepster)
                 Re: Your malpractice numbers don't make sense. - (altmann) - (1)
                     Thanks. -NT - (Another Scott)

Only Olaf Stapledon ever succeeded on this kind of scale, and Olaf Stapledon is dead.
65 ms