IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Just stop it.
Yes, debt to GDP is high now. Debt to GDP has taken off because tax receipts have collapsed due to the collapse in the economy.


You really are blinded by his light here. The deficit under Bush was bad. Its 3 times higher now and the laws being passed aren't even factored in. (and don't talk about savings...as the amount of "savings" in that bill is a rounding error in the budget).

It isn't tax receipts that got us here...and what they've spent is doing nothing for unemployment. And if you don't think debt load is important, you aren't paying attention. The model we've been told is "better" is imploding...and we're about 2 administrations away from being more in debt that we can possibly pay without currency devaluation.
I will choose a path that's clear. I will choose freewill.
New Evidence, please.
New unemployment rate isnt evidence?
New For what?
New Hmm.
Isn't hard to read the paper

http://www.cbsnews.c...86644-503544.html

The latest high-point is not unexpected, considering the federal deficit for the just-ended 2009 fiscal year hit an all-time high at $1.42-trillion – more than triple the previous year's record high.


Oh...and...

http://thehill.com/b...-is-unsustainable

The CBO projects that Obama's policies would produce deficits averaging nearly $1 trillion for the next decade.


So much for that "temporary blip" of spending due to downturn...the policies in place have made trillion dollar deficits EXPECTED for the next 10 years...so the above record times 3 is previous record times 2 in SYSTEMIC fashion.

Take the blinders off, man...it will do you some good.
I will choose a path that's clear. I will choose freewill.
New You're not contradicting my thesis.
Your first excerpt says the deficit is larger than under Bush. How does that contradict my stating that the Debt/GDP ratio has ballooned because the economy imploded and cut tax revenue substantially?

Your second excerpt doesn't talk about debt/GDP either.

The CBO also says:
http://cboblog.cbo.gov/?p=1034

The central challenge is straightforward and stark: The rising costs of health care will put tremendous pressure on the federal budget during the next few decades and beyond.


Which is what I said. Over the Long Term the budget needs to come closer to balance, which means increases in health care costs have to be reduced to something approaching GDP growth.

The deficit to GDP ratio is projected to drop substantially over the next few years - http://www.whitehous...sets/hist01z2.xls (31 kB):

Year - GDP ($B) - Receipts (% of GDP) - Outlays (% of GDP) - Deficit (% of GDP)

1980 2,724.2 19.0 21.7 -2.7
1981 3,057.0 19.6 22.2 -2.6
1982 3,223.7 19.2 23.1 -4.0
1983 3,440.7 17.5 23.5 -6.0
1984 3,844.4 17.3 22.2 -4.8
1985 4,146.3 17.7 22.8 -5.1
1986 4,403.9 17.5 22.5 -5.0
1987 4,651.4 18.4 21.6 -3.2
1988 5,008.5 18.2 21.3 -3.1
1989 5,399.5 18.4 21.2 -2.8
1990 5,734.5 18.0 21.9 -3.9
1991 5,930.5 17.8 22.3 -4.5
1992 6,242.0 17.5 22.1 -4.7
1993 6,587.3 17.5 21.4 -3.9
1994 6,976.6 18.0 21.0 -2.9
1995 7,341.1 18.4 20.6 -2.2
1996 7,718.3 18.8 20.2 -1.4
1997 8,211.7 19.2 19.5 -0.3
1998 8,663.0 19.9 19.1 0.8
1999 9,208.4 19.8 18.5 1.4
2000 9,821.0 20.6 18.2 2.4
2001 10,225.3 19.5 18.2 1.3
2002 10,543.9 17.6 19.1 -1.5
2003 10,979.8 16.2 19.7 -3.4
2004 11,685.6 16.1 19.6 -3.5
2005 12,445.7 17.3 19.9 -2.6
2006 13,224.9 18.2 20.1 -1.9
2007 13,896.0 18.5 19.6 -1.2
2008 14,439.0 17.5 20.7 -3.2
2009 14,237.2 14.8 24.7 -9.9
2010 estimate 14,623.9 14.8 25.4 -10.6
2011 estimate 15,299.0 16.8 25.1 -8.3
2012 estimate 16,203.3 18.1 23.2 -5.1
2013 estimate 17,182.2 18.6 22.8 -4.2
2014 estimate 18,192.6 19.0 22.9 -3.9
2015 estimate 19,190.4 18.9 22.9 -3.9


The deficit to GDP ratio will fall substantially over the next few years, even with large deficits in dollar terms. Yes, the total debt will go up over the next few years, but most of the jump was due to the implosion of the economy as a result of Bush's policies - http://www.whitehous...sets/hist07z1.xls .

Finally, once we're mostly out of Iraq and Afghanistan, and once we fully implement things as outlined here - http://www.whitehouse.gov/issues/fiscal - the deficit will fall still further.

Now show me how your apparent concern about Debt/GDP is more valid than that of people who are willing to get 4% from the US treasury on a 20 year bond - http://www.ustreas.g...positeindex.shtml ? The market says it's not a problem. People who are willing to put their money where their mouth is don't seem to be worried; otherwise they'd be demanding higher rates for long bonds.

Box mentioned unemployment. Yes, it's too high. But remember this graph: http://www.washingto...010_04/023170.php

Try again?

Thanks.

Cheers,
Scott.
New Whatever lets you sleep at night.
You're going to keep blaming the last guy right on through the new guy taking the last dollar out of your wallet.

You think we'll be out of mid-east soon? Keep dreaming.

Love that link to...promise to return to "honest budgeting"...funny as I don't think Congress is going to pass one this year.

I'm glad you like the guy.
I will choose a path that's clear. I will choose freewill.
New Since you like quotes about projections

The story of today’s deficits starts in January 2001, as President Bill Clinton was leaving office. The Congressional Budget Office estimated then that the government would run an average annual surplus of more than $800 billion a year from 2009 to 2012.



source: http://www.nytimes.c.../10leonhardt.html

So much for that wishful thinking that Shrub's policies would eliminate annual deficits.




"Chicago to my mind was the only place to be. ... I above all liked the city because it was filled with people all a-bustle, and the clatter of hooves and carriages, and with delivery wagons and drays and peddlers and the boom and clank of freight trains. And when those black clouds came sailing in from the west, pouring thunderstorms upon us so that you couldn't hear the cries or curses of humankind, I liked that best of all. Chicago could stand up to the worst God had to offer. I understood why it was built--a place for trade, of course, with railroads and ships and so on, but mostly to give all of us a magnitude of defiance that is not provided by one house on the plains. And the plains is where those storms come from."

-- E.L. Doctorow
New Nice find...
and pre-health care and talked about the proposal needed to make serious savings there...and what happened??? A proposal that increases costs.

Kind of fits right in with the theme of saying Bush was bad and Obama is not making any improvements.
I will choose a path that's clear. I will choose freewill.
New And the invasion and occupation of Iraq
was only going to cost us $200 billion ...




"Chicago to my mind was the only place to be. ... I above all liked the city because it was filled with people all a-bustle, and the clatter of hooves and carriages, and with delivery wagons and drays and peddlers and the boom and clank of freight trains. And when those black clouds came sailing in from the west, pouring thunderstorms upon us so that you couldn't hear the cries or curses of humankind, I liked that best of all. Chicago could stand up to the worst God had to offer. I understood why it was built--a place for trade, of course, with railroads and ships and so on, but mostly to give all of us a magnitude of defiance that is not provided by one house on the plains. And the plains is where those storms come from."

-- E.L. Doctorow
     tomtom summarizes the current economic environment in the US - (Another Scott) - (15)
         Some are doing it intentionally - (jay)
         debt is at 90% of gdp so your suggestion is to spend more - (boxley) - (13)
             This isn't complicated. - (Another Scott) - (10)
                 Just stop it. - (beepster) - (9)
                     Evidence, please. -NT - (Another Scott) - (8)
                         unemployment rate isnt evidence? -NT - (boxley) - (1)
                             For what? -NT - (Another Scott)
                         Hmm. - (beepster) - (5)
                             You're not contradicting my thesis. - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                 Whatever lets you sleep at night. - (beepster)
                             Since you like quotes about projections - (lincoln) - (2)
                                 Nice find... - (beepster) - (1)
                                     And the invasion and occupation of Iraq - (lincoln)
             Krugman on debt to GDP. - (Another Scott) - (1)
                 Re: Krugman on debt to GDP. - (boxley)

Powered by the Great Sphincter on the Mall!
57 ms