IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Ah, that resolves a number of troubling inconsistencies . .
. . with the usual line from women.

First of all, talking to geeks. Women don't generally talk to geeks, or anyone who might be one. Like women I meet at . . . well, anywhere.

"So you have your own business. That's nice, what kind of business is it?"

"Well it involves network and computer technology."

"Oooh, excuse me, I see someone across the room I need to talk to - nice meeting you."

Works every time - so I've learned never to reveal what my current business is, and I carry CloveGarden business cards.
New The 'computer' modifier seems to be the pheromone
inhibitor.

Maybe 'geek' (now) is generally associated with anything cerebral(?) and with attendant minutiae, lore which must be stuffed into brain-pan ... all deathly stuff to the casual mind in search of simple pleasures, mostly.
But computer-geek multiplies the amount of lore stuffed into such folks' vocabularies -- with new armies of inscrutable TLAs / onion layers of complexity, akin to codebreaking with no plaintext in sight:
impossible to 'explain' in KISS manner -- yet so many have tried. (Usually artlessly IME.)

Big Science membership OTOH might be thought to produce that earlier 'nerd' (of Fast Times at Ridgemont High and successor flic.)
My experience has been, when queried and the accelerator word arose: you still get a break, if your 'explanation' makes suitably cute use of the baseball-on-a-string analogy, and you don't segue into anything which sounds tutorial. The girlfriends of my SO thought the topic even interesting-enough to want to see the place, etc. ('Course too, SO was enroute to a marine bio degree, so no culure clash there.)

Not yet very clear why the computer add-on is so stifling; could be that the picture of the field is an imagining that it's all head-work with arcane logical shorthands (as, of course it mostly is)
-- maybe akin to the Chess Master game (entirely in-head.) It's an alien concept to anyone who has never delved deeply into how Anything 'works'
-- you know -- all those biz-majors who couldn't grok basic algebra, can't replace a plastic light cover (never mind change the switch.)

These fast/dumb machines are just too abstruse for being, literally, The Universal Machine (is my guess.)
General science things can be related to say ... going to moon; you can show someone a circuit board (even!) and they will look with fascination when you say:
this is going into space, eventually beyond the solar system: to count mesons, when we've calibrated the sucker. Ooooh!!

Not long ago - -
Someone who had at least grokked how Greek stuff like milli-, micro-, nano ... gets to --> pico: was fascinated to *see*, on a scope: a rise time of half a nSec or so (TD pulser)
-- when explained that this 'pulse' had changed from 0 to 1 volt: and you could SEE that happening in "half a billionth of a second!" (actually the scope cart was in my kitchen, in the event..)

'Course: to someone who can't ÷1000 in-head: the above would go ^Zoooom^.
Maybe play the intro to 2nd Brandenburg instead, if you happen to have a clarino handy?

It's ALL Theatre! doncha know??
Guess computer types need to come up with some much better choreography ... before they get Respect. Eh?


     Hey Gryg - (crazy) - (25)
         so he needs to come up with a line more like - (boxley) - (15)
             Nope, you got it wrong - (crazy) - (14)
                 huh? - (boxley) - (13)
                     Sounds like my daughter - (crazy) - (5)
                         Wait, when did we start talking about "Dexter"? -NT - (drook) - (4)
                             "Dexter" is a great role model - (crazy) - (3)
                                 You want to enjoy the hiding, though. - (static) - (2)
                                     Nah - (crazy)
                                     Dupe ^ -NT - (crazy)
                     'Honesty is a good thing but it is not profitable to its - (Ashton) - (6)
                         mebee I travelled in different cirlces when I was younger - (boxley) - (5)
                             Piracy! - (Ashton)
                             You payed $10 for a dance? - (crazy) - (3)
                                 ask me at the bash :-) -NT - (boxley) - (1)
                                     Will do -NT - (crazy)
                                 I'm guessing it wasn't the $10, it was the $20 - (mhuber)
         Written by a woman. - (Andrew Grygus) - (7)
             You hit the core requirement without addressing it. - (crazy) - (3)
                 Actually, I have only one real problem . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (2)
                     if they were worth a spit they would already have someone - (boxley) - (1)
                         Actually, I think not. - (Andrew Grygus)
             Nice rant. But Lore is a man. - (Another Scott) - (2)
                 Ah, that resolves a number of troubling inconsistencies . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (1)
                     The 'computer' modifier seems to be the pheromone - (Ashton)
         The Daily Mash's take on dating and starting a family... - (Another Scott)

Powered by isospin!
46 ms