IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Oh... come now...
You expect them to do real work?

Plus real work doesn't make the SHEEPLE FEEL SAFER!

Only the showy work like they are doing now... that makes us feel like cattle being pushed through the pens towards slaughter.


It is sort of like Yosemite National park and rock slides... Rock Slides are going to happen... the earth is moving and the Granite is buoyant and bouncing on the Magma... People have continually asked for a few decades (especially after a tragic rock slide) what we are going to do to curb the rock slides that drop 1,000 to 400,000 tons of solid granite about once a week.

The answer: Be careful when you are walking in the Wilderness!
New Ergo: hire Temple Grandin; she does cattle Righteous..ly
(Proving somewhat that, 'autism' is very-likely a feature! masquerading as a bug (?)

I have no solutions for revealing Intent, and the core of the problem of sabotage is: Technology.
Always it is far- far- Simpler to disable/confound or destroy any 'machine' (homo-sap mental construct of a plan or physical device) than to create the complex one-off gadget.

n! Rulez all these pipe-dreams.
MTBF gives a clue to the gross consequences, in a physical machine.
Methinks that Insanely-Great Plans also need a MTBF #.

And while assembling pipe dreams, the pseudo-science of 'psychology' needs to get some bids out for a method or two of ID-ing persons -- candidates for any position of great Power -- who are apt to resemble the plot, ingredients and er, near-fatal synergies of the Cheney Shogunate:

1) An anti-intellectual individual, repeatedly assessed as being "the most uncurious person I've ever met".
One such whose walking-swagger is matched by congruent mental processes / the stubbornness of callow youth + a mind to match. Shake n'bake with a sidekick --

2) Able to reliably manipulate a vain swaggerer via flattery and plain old tested Göbbelsian propaganda techniques -- after initially parlaying a position of "finding a Veep" (in this case) into just cutting-out 300M middle-men and naming self. The micro-Cheney, base unit of anti-Modesty, forevermore.

And like that. We gots all that hindsight; yet the next charlatan or charlatan-pair shall have morphed beyond the above simple case of the naif successfully seduced by his Iago. Similar situation with the next bomber creature: how does one do an attitude inventory on a potential> even probable sociopath/psychotic??

Beats me. Welcome to Chaos Critter Selection 101 / the 21st Century's least understood non-process. But all the rest is ... just talk.


New In any case...
People are more worried about getting the last bit of toothpaste out of the tube. A $1.70 tube of tooth paste. That lasts about a month.

They will spend $30 (plus $12 shipping and handling) for a device that "automagically" extracts the last bit ...

You lose about $0.01 of toothpaste per tube with out it. So, lets see, at 1 cent per month... in $42 for the device, not to mention the difficulty of mounting it on the wall... at a minimum... only about 80 years 6 months for ROI.

What a deal. What a deal!


That (minds like that) is what we have to placate and most politicians know this.
Expand Edited by folkert Jan. 24, 2010, 04:10:06 PM EST
New Already have that test
Anybody who can get through a modern presidential campaign needs to be under serious psychiatric observation, and probably face-tattooed "Do Not Follow" in case they escape the facility. The system seems to have failed last time - the current President seems almost sane.

I can only think of two systems that are better optimizations for selecting the worst available leader. Monarchy and revolution.

Neither of those is entirely foolproof. England had a really good king (Aelfred the Great) in the 900's. But he was the seventh son, so nobody expected him to be king. And Vaclev Havel - wtf? A poet and actual decent human being running a successful revolution? Seriously, wtf?
New Like they say
Democracy is the worst possible way of running a country, except for everything else that's ever been tried.

As your examples point out, the nuanced truth of that saying is that any system will occasionally produce good leaders, and occasionally produce bad ones. The test is which system produces which kind more often.
--

Drew
     TATP detector for (ultimately) $100. - (Another Scott) - (19)
         never fly - (boxley) - (18)
             Trouble is ... - (Another Scott) - (17)
                 No he didn't - (drook) - (16)
                     I wasn't there, so I have to go on reports. - (Another Scott) - (15)
                         I still disagree - (drook) - (14)
                             Ok, but "impossible" is a very strong word... - (Another Scott) - (13)
                                 Proves my point - (drook) - (3)
                                     GRAAHHHH! - (folkert) - (2)
                                         Security by Turbulence! - (mhuber)
                                         Yeah, there won't be many concocting Nitro either.. -NT - (Ashton)
                                 Defending against specific tactics is a losing game. - (pwhysall) - (8)
                                     Oh... come now... - (folkert) - (4)
                                         Ergo: hire Temple Grandin; she does cattle Righteous..ly - (Ashton) - (3)
                                             In any case... - (folkert)
                                             Already have that test - (mhuber) - (1)
                                                 Like they say - (drook)
                                     teh plods? they never catch anyone - (boxley)
                                     So? Fly naked? -NT - (Mycroft_Holmes_Iv) - (1)
                                         start atheist airlines -NT - (boxley)

What's the Queen Koopa like?
160 ms