Re: We seem to have a definition problem

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #319,518 by boxley 1/4/10 1:24:26 PM Reply	Re: We seem to have a definition problem yes we do have a definition problem. Religion and the practice thereof is personal as well as organized so cannot be defined externally by a non believer. I dont believe a bath in the ganges is a requirement to personal salvation but some folks do. Now if you want to argue about how many angels can dance on the head of a pin the answer is 12
Post #319,519 by crazy 1/4/10 1:29:20 PM Reply	No, the answer is 42 And you didn't like what I said and started an agument with me, not the other way around. I merely described my experience and my interpretation.
Post #319,522 by boxley 1/4/10 2:03:47 PM Reply	sorry about that wasnt trying to argue, just seemed that you were taking it too personal. The answer is 12 42 would be too crowded for cool moves
Post #319,524 by crazy 1/4/10 2:47:13 PM Reply	No crowding The mice see to that. The head is really a multidimensional portal. And I ALWAYS will take personal threats to my freedom, however indirect.

I went to church yesterday. - (crazy) - (63) - Jan. 4, 2010, 05:39:39 AM EST

Glad you found it interesting. - (static) - (30) - Jan. 4, 2010, 07:33:56 AM EST

I was - (crazy) - (29) - Jan. 4, 2010, 08:21:52 AM EST

I was reminding myself, too. - (static) - (28) - Jan. 4, 2010, 05:14:35 PM EST

I know many Catholics - (crazy) - (27) - Jan. 4, 2010, 06:42:30 PM EST

In the same way Texans are also Americans - (drook) - (14) - Jan. 4, 2010, 08:49:38 PM EST

Hmm, that's not quite right - (drook) - (13) - Jan. 5, 2010, 09:41:53 AM EST

It took us a little while, but we got there! :-D - (static) - (12) - Jan. 5, 2010, 06:57:52 PM EST

I may be wrong, but I think you're not quite right. - (Another Scott) - (11) - Jan. 5, 2010, 10:51:51 PM EST

Quite so. - (static) - (9) - Jan. 6, 2010, 02:26:11 AM EST

Again, I think you're relying on what "authorities" say... - (Another Scott) - (5) - Jan. 6, 2010, 08:41:03 AM EST

I see. - (static) - (4) - Jan. 6, 2010, 03:50:29 PM EST

As Box says... - (Another Scott) - (3) - Jan. 6, 2010, 05:56:24 PM EST

Oh yeah? - (drook) - (1) - Jan. 6, 2010, 06:47:17 PM EST

not hardly - (boxley) - Jan. 6, 2010, 07:05:12 PM EST

Yes, it helps. - (static) - Jan. 6, 2010, 07:20:46 PM EST

incorrect - (boxley) - (2) - Jan. 6, 2010, 09:38:10 AM EST

We're talking past each other. - (static) - (1) - Jan. 6, 2010, 03:42:56 PM EST

Re: We're talking past each other. - (boxley) - Jan. 6, 2010, 04:50:44 PM EST

What about the the whole reason.. - (folkert) - Jan. 6, 2010, 07:14:43 AM EST

Kinda what Drew said. - (static) - (11) - Jan. 5, 2010, 07:58:12 AM EST

are you talking roman oe eastern? -NT - (boxley) - (3) - Jan. 5, 2010, 08:45:27 AM EST

Roman. - (static) - (2) - Jan. 5, 2010, 06:59:29 PM EST

They're the Catholics whose priests can marry IIRC -NT - (drook) - (1) - Jan. 5, 2010, 10:15:39 PM EST

and their pope is in byzanteum -NT - (boxley) - Jan. 6, 2010, 09:39:26 AM EST

Sigh - (crazy) - (6) - Jan. 5, 2010, 11:27:18 PM EST

I led you to mis-interpret me. - (static) - (3) - Jan. 6, 2010, 03:10:41 AM EST

Oh, I accept you are doing this with best intentions - (crazy) - (2) - Jan. 6, 2010, 05:48:48 AM EST

I do not speak from a position of *no* knowledge. - (static) - (1) - Jan. 6, 2010, 07:13:11 AM EST

Tada! -NT - (crazy) - Jan. 6, 2010, 08:56:36 AM EST

Its about faith, not belief. - (folkert) - (1) - Jan. 6, 2010, 07:18:26 AM EST

Thanks -NT - (crazy) - Jan. 6, 2010, 08:52:10 AM EST

the priest prolly has no idea you were there - (boxley) - (27) - Jan. 4, 2010, 08:58:57 AM EST

Lord's prayer NO - (crazy) - Jan. 4, 2010, 10:20:09 AM EST

And note: - (crazy) - Jan. 4, 2010, 10:22:10 AM EST

Oh, and how convenient - (crazy) - (24) - Jan. 4, 2010, 10:33:01 AM EST

Why do you bother? - (beepster) - (2) - Jan. 4, 2010, 10:56:41 AM EST

I think he does it for his daughter... -NT - (Another Scott) - Jan. 4, 2010, 11:06:09 AM EST

I have to straddle the worlds - (crazy) - Jan. 4, 2010, 11:07:24 AM EST

Re: Oh, and how convenient - (boxley) - (20) - Jan. 4, 2010, 11:12:03 AM EST

You are correct - (crazy) - (19) - Jan. 4, 2010, 11:20:13 AM EST

No, they didn't - (beepster) - (18) - Jan. 4, 2010, 11:44:45 AM EST

Close, but no cigar - (crazy) - (17) - Jan. 4, 2010, 12:19:36 PM EST

Option 3 - (drook) - (16) - Jan. 4, 2010, 12:35:14 PM EST

We seem to have a definition problem - (crazy) - (15) - Jan. 4, 2010, 01:03:55 PM EST

Re: We seem to have a definition problem - (boxley) - (3) - Jan. 4, 2010, 01:24:26 PM EST

No, the answer is 42 - (crazy) - (2) - Jan. 4, 2010, 01:29:20 PM EST

sorry about that - (boxley) - (1) - Jan. 4, 2010, 02:03:47 PM EST

No crowding - (crazy) - Jan. 4, 2010, 02:47:13 PM EST

"Delusional" works - (drook) - (4) - Jan. 4, 2010, 02:10:52 PM EST

+5, Insightful. -NT - (static) - (3) - Jan. 4, 2010, 05:20:21 PM EST

Do you think protestants are different? - (drook) - (2) - Jan. 4, 2010, 05:28:23 PM EST

Yes and no. - (static) - Jan. 4, 2010, 06:06:48 PM EST

Rent 9 - (crazy) - Jan. 4, 2010, 06:34:33 PM EST

The Credo is in the middle - (mhuber) - (5) - Jan. 6, 2010, 03:22:15 AM EST

Seems to be common - (crazy) - (4) - Jan. 6, 2010, 06:45:58 AM EST

I just stumbled onto this - (crazy) - Jan. 6, 2010, 06:57:42 AM EST

Internal consisency is for well-engineered systems - (mhuber) - (2) - Jan. 7, 2010, 01:06:38 AM EST

I deeply admire you -NT - (crazy) - Jan. 7, 2010, 10:49:23 AM EST

Aquinas has company.. - (Ashton) - Jan. 10, 2010, 04:05:14 PM EST

Why not tell your daughter you have only so much tolerance? - (warmachine) - (1) - Jan. 4, 2010, 05:30:12 PM EST

I have infinate tolerance for the delusional - (crazy) - Jan. 4, 2010, 06:39:02 PM EST

Harrumph.. - (Ashton) - (1) - Jan. 9, 2010, 07:55:56 PM EST

Glory! A-men! -NT - (scoenye) - Jan. 10, 2010, 04:07:22 PM EST

Same thing we do every night, Pinky...
131 ms