Assume 100 people died in gitmo and other black sites.
I think this is high, not because those bastards wouldn't kill far more, they just aren't good enough to get the right people, and they don't like the hassle when they have to account for killing the wrong people. Not that they get in any real trouble, it's just a pain in the ass. So they tend to keep them alive for as long as possible while hoping to get some info to justify the whole exercise.
You wanna higher? Come up with a bit of supporting info. Yes, every life is sacred (just like every sperm, at least to some people), but the issue here is not that no one is killed via this process, just that it doesn't compare to your example.
So now, with a number of a hundred people, let's assume 90 of them were totally innocent poor bastards who were turned in by their neighbors who wanted revenge over a historical slight. 90%. Yes, I accept that the vast majority of the people held in those prison have done nothing (or at least not a lot) wrong.
Ok, so at this point, I start reading on Soviet history. I may know a bit, but a resfresher never hurts. And then I realize there is simpy no point in continuing.
If your sense of scale is so off that you consider what they did as a historical precedent that compares with what is happening right now, there is no discussion to be had.
100 deaths vs millions of deaths. If you think gitmo will be scaling up and getting worse, then maybe I've missed something. But I doubt it.