During the years when the dems had the house

1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #31,832 by boxley 3/12/02 12:23:44 PM Reply	During the years when the dems had the house I used to listen adnauseum to Rep Miller on the energy commmitee trying to lock up Alaska. He would trot out all the usual suspects who would spout their shopworn crap and pass a bill to close the arctic. Now the repos Don young energy commitee is different. He would trot out all the usual suspects who would spout their shopworn crap and pass a bill to open the arctic. Just not your turn anymore, get over it. thanx, bill There is no difference between a "settler," "soldier," "secular," or "Chassidic Jew." The target is the JEW. \ufffd Harvey Tannenbaum
Post #31,840 by mmoffitt 3/12/02 1:08:42 PM Reply	If you accept what they hand you, you deserve what you get.
Post #31,855 by boxley 3/12/02 1:52:32 PM Reply	each according to my needs of their abilities? There is no difference between a "settler," "soldier," "secular," or "Chassidic Jew." The target is the JEW. \ufffd Harvey Tannenbaum
Post #31,993 by mmoffitt 3/13/02 9:58:38 AM Reply	No. each according to THEIR needs ;-)
Post #31,999 by boxley 3/13/02 10:51:41 AM Reply	who decides? commisar=ceo same diff :) There is no difference between a "settler," "soldier," "secular," or "Chassidic Jew." The target is the JEW. \ufffd Harvey Tannenbaum
Post #32,014 by mmoffitt 3/13/02 12:33:11 PM Reply	How about letting me decide? :-)
Post #32,020 by boxley 3/13/02 12:41:30 PM Reply	equals each according to my needs of their abilities :) There is no difference between a "settler," "soldier," "secular," or "Chassidic Jew." The target is the JEW. \ufffd Harvey Tannenbaum
Post #32,027 by mmoffitt 3/13/02 1:04:39 PM Reply	No, I am more equal than you are :)
Post #32,044 by boxley 3/13/02 1:50:22 PM Reply	thats why (communism-people=works)(communism+people=doesnt) There is no difference between a "settler," "soldier," "secular," or "Chassidic Jew." The target is the JEW. \ufffd Harvey Tannenbaum
Post #32,186 by mmoffitt 3/14/02 1:28:39 PM Reply	How do you know? It's never been tried.
Post #31,870 by Brandioch 3/12/02 2:48:44 PM Reply	That's why we should do it in public. Forgive me for referencing another thread in another forum, but, as I have said, a person will filer which "facts" s/he will accept as "facts" (instead of "conjecture" or "fantasy" or "bad science"). This will be based upon his/her previous opinion. So, we drag the policy process out into the open. Then we try to avoid the emotional discussions ("but what about the children?"). Then see if you can hit a consensus for 90% of the population. Personally, I think things like opening Alaska up for resource exploitation >SHOULD< be discussed in public. If you make a mistake, you can do a lot of damage. But that doesn't mean that we have to skip all exploitation. Or that suitable safeguards can't be put in place. But doing it simply by pre-screening your "experts" for people who already agree with your policy is beyond stupid (but it does make good politics).

White House: Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain. - (Silverlock) - (88) - March 11, 2002, 09:35:20 AM EST

The part I don't understand..... - (Brandioch) - (86) - March 11, 2002, 11:13:55 AM EST

My lack of understanding is different - (Silverlock) - (85) - March 11, 2002, 11:34:36 AM EST

Here's the theory - (drewk) - (1) - March 11, 2002, 11:45:12 AM EST

Good insight -NT - (SpiceWare) - March 11, 2002, 12:33:58 PM EST

Dates, names, topics of discussion - (bepatient) - (82) - March 11, 2002, 12:07:15 PM EST

We do NOT have a right to know. - (mmoffitt) - (80) - March 11, 2002, 01:16:10 PM EST

Well golly... - (bepatient) - (78) - March 11, 2002, 01:33:46 PM EST

Exactly how stupid are these executives? - (mmoffitt) - (76) - March 11, 2002, 02:51:38 PM EST

The policy is a part of the public record. - (bepatient) - (75) - March 11, 2002, 03:10:15 PM EST

Sorry, thought that was rhetorical. - (mmoffitt) - (72) - March 11, 2002, 03:22:41 PM EST

Well then... - (bepatient) - (71) - March 11, 2002, 03:51:31 PM EST

Huh? How does that follow? - (mmoffitt) - (70) - March 11, 2002, 04:02:58 PM EST

Are you actually... - (bepatient) - (69) - March 11, 2002, 05:08:45 PM EST

You mean.... - (Brandioch) - (1) - March 11, 2002, 05:14:12 PM EST

No. I don't. -NT - (bepatient) - March 11, 2002, 05:25:04 PM EST

I knew the bias would come out if I waited long enough. - (mmoffitt) - (66) - March 12, 2002, 09:07:21 AM EST

That's not the problem - (drewk) - (12) - March 12, 2002, 10:33:50 AM EST

I don't see the problem. - (Brandioch) - (11) - March 12, 2002, 12:20:13 PM EST

During the years when the dems had the house - (boxley) - (10) - March 12, 2002, 12:23:44 PM EST

If you accept what they hand you, you deserve what you get. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (8) - March 12, 2002, 01:08:42 PM EST

each according to my needs of their abilities? -NT - (boxley) - (7) - March 12, 2002, 01:52:32 PM EST

No. each according to THEIR needs ;-) -NT - (mmoffitt) - (6) - March 13, 2002, 09:58:38 AM EST

who decides? commisar=ceo same diff :) -NT - (boxley) - (5) - March 13, 2002, 10:51:41 AM EST

How about letting me decide? :-) -NT - (mmoffitt) - (4) - March 13, 2002, 12:33:11 PM EST

equals each according to my needs of their abilities :) -NT - (boxley) - (3) - March 13, 2002, 12:41:30 PM EST

No, I am more equal than you are :) -NT - (mmoffitt) - (2) - March 13, 2002, 01:04:39 PM EST

thats why (communism-people=works)(communism+people=doesnt) -NT - (boxley) - (1) - March 13, 2002, 01:50:22 PM EST

How do you know? It's never been tried. -NT - (mmoffitt) - March 14, 2002, 01:28:39 PM EST

That's why we should do it in public. - (Brandioch) - March 12, 2002, 02:48:44 PM EST

Absolutely, completely and uttlerly wrong. - (bepatient) - (5) - March 12, 2002, 03:26:21 PM EST

So, part of your job is accommodation. - (mmoffitt) - (1) - March 13, 2002, 09:43:29 AM EST

Bzzzt...wrong again. - (bepatient) - March 13, 2002, 01:41:28 PM EST

And in your world, criminals write the laws? - (Brandioch) - (2) - March 13, 2002, 12:56:48 PM EST

Why do I bother? - (bepatient) - (1) - March 13, 2002, 01:49:01 PM EST

Crime is not "advice". - (Brandioch) - March 13, 2002, 01:59:28 PM EST

Keeping my example...and to illustrate other answer. - (bepatient) - (46) - March 12, 2002, 03:34:20 PM EST

Counter example. - (Brandioch) - March 12, 2002, 03:42:45 PM EST

You want to "discuss" this? - (mmoffitt) - (44) - March 13, 2002, 09:52:04 AM EST

applause - (Brandioch) - (7) - March 13, 2002, 12:53:28 PM EST

Real example - (ben_tilly) - (6) - March 13, 2002, 05:07:33 PM EST

Good example. - (Brandioch) - (5) - March 13, 2002, 05:59:11 PM EST

Well said. Concur completely. -NT - (mmoffitt) - March 14, 2002, 08:50:00 AM EST

Do you have reading problems? - (ben_tilly) - (3) - March 14, 2002, 09:39:35 AM EST

No worse than your's. - (Brandioch) - (2) - March 14, 2002, 12:43:09 PM EST

One of us has more free time... - (ben_tilly) - (1) - March 15, 2002, 12:49:58 AM EST

Full circle. - (Brandioch) - March 15, 2002, 11:42:18 AM EST

How are you going to know about the problem? - (bepatient) - (35) - March 13, 2002, 01:44:27 PM EST

Again, an interesting world you live in. - (Brandioch) - (33) - March 13, 2002, 02:04:17 PM EST

Not much of a reader are you. - (bepatient) - (32) - March 13, 2002, 02:08:49 PM EST

You say "balance". - (Brandioch) - (31) - March 13, 2002, 02:19:18 PM EST

I'll try once. - (Ric Locke) - (30) - March 13, 2002, 10:27:46 PM EST

And what color is the sky in your world? - (mmoffitt) - March 14, 2002, 09:14:28 AM EST

Higher speeds cause more deaths. - (Brandioch) - (28) - March 14, 2002, 12:56:55 PM EST

And you have never seen... - (a6l6e6x) - (27) - March 14, 2002, 02:48:23 PM EST

The order of those events is the key. - (Brandioch) - (26) - March 14, 2002, 03:11:41 PM EST

Who do you think monitors the laws? - (bepatient) - (25) - March 14, 2002, 05:57:23 PM EST

The eco-freaks do. - (Brandioch) - (24) - March 14, 2002, 06:19:04 PM EST

Why do I think they do? - (bepatient) - (23) - March 14, 2002, 07:20:09 PM EST

You use that phrase, but I do not think you understand it. - (Brandioch) - (22) - March 14, 2002, 08:00:27 PM EST

You don't know what you're talking about. - (bepatient) - (21) - March 14, 2002, 08:45:42 PM EST

Ah, the old "I have secret wisdom and you don't" ploy. - (Brandioch) - (20) - March 14, 2002, 09:48:21 PM EST

Courtesy request - (ben_tilly) - March 14, 2002, 11:48:55 PM EST

Ah...I see. - (bepatient) - (18) - March 15, 2002, 08:20:52 AM EST

Ah, since I slammed your "secret wisdom of the ancients"... - (Brandioch) - (17) - March 15, 2002, 10:58:50 AM EST

Just applying your "logic" - (bepatient) - (16) - March 15, 2002, 11:09:42 AM EST

Another successful application of filtering. - (Brandioch) - (15) - March 15, 2002, 12:39:08 PM EST

I can see... - (bepatient) - (14) - March 15, 2002, 03:25:52 PM EST

I can see you're still filtering. - (Brandioch) - (13) - March 15, 2002, 03:55:04 PM EST

No. - (bepatient) - (12) - March 15, 2002, 04:36:45 PM EST

Strange...... - (Brandioch) - (6) - March 16, 2002, 08:30:22 PM EST

Nope. You can't read. -NT - (bepatient) - (5) - March 16, 2002, 08:53:07 PM EST

When pressed for actual facts..... - (Brandioch) - (4) - March 16, 2002, 09:26:19 PM EST

Sure...no sweat. - (bepatient) - (3) - March 16, 2002, 10:20:09 PM EST

Why so fact aversive? - (Brandioch) - (2) - March 17, 2002, 11:54:02 AM EST

this space left blank -NT - (bepatient) - (1) - March 17, 2002, 12:25:55 PM EST

Again, why are you afraid of the facts? - (Brandioch) - March 17, 2002, 02:33:01 PM EST

Clarification please. - (mmoffitt) - (4) - March 17, 2002, 06:34:53 PM EST

Technically not criminals. - (Brandioch) - (3) - March 17, 2002, 07:24:14 PM EST

That is indeed a fascinating notion. -NT - (mmoffitt) - March 17, 2002, 07:38:38 PM EST

Perhaps competing companies are better at working a loop... - (a6l6e6x) - (1) - March 18, 2002, 12:50:51 AM EST

Possibly. - (Brandioch) - March 18, 2002, 09:46:51 PM EST

You changed your hypothesis. - (mmoffitt) - March 14, 2002, 08:58:27 AM EST

Hmmmm..... - (Brandioch) - March 11, 2002, 03:26:10 PM EST

Well..it does happen with ever administration... - (Simon_Jester) - March 11, 2002, 08:09:07 PM EST

Rant for rant... - (jb4) - March 12, 2002, 02:12:27 PM EST

Just ask JacksonLee - (boxley) - March 11, 2002, 03:22:06 PM EST

I say they should release the names... - (marlowe) - March 11, 2002, 02:44:02 PM EST

We all know that the President is but a mear puppet - (nking) - March 11, 2002, 05:23:34 PM EST

iwethey.org

This is a lerpadism.
204 ms