It's still the Bush disaster

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #316,495 by Silverlock 10/31/09 6:40:22 AM Reply	It's still the Bush disaster
Post #316,536 by beepster 10/31/09 6:51:04 PM Reply	Right. And keep blaming him when all the new stuff Washington comes up with drive this economy into the ground. I will choose a path that's clear. I will choose freewill.
Post #316,541 by boxley 10/31/09 7:42:11 PM Reply	be fair it took 8 years before they stopped blaming Clinton
Post #316,542 by Andrew Grygus 10/31/09 7:47:21 PM Reply	Not so . . . . . they're still blaming Clinton. Everything that went wrong in the Bush administration was actually Clinton's fault. Ask any "conservative".
Post #316,545 by boxley 10/31/09 8:55:20 PM Reply	they are blaming obama now clinton is off the hook
Post #316,547 by Another Scott 10/31/09 9:12:53 PM Reply	Clinton will always be there, just as Carter is. Heck, they still try to beat up on Roosevelt... Cheers, Scott.
Post #316,548 by Andrew Grygus 10/31/09 9:31:34 PM Reply	Over on Nick Petrele's forums . . . . . I mentioned something they were blaming on Obama as having been initiated by Bush. Nick's response was, "Bush is out of office now, you can't keep blaming him for what Obama is doing". I asked, "If Bush is out of office now, how come Clinton isn't?". No response.

more words please - (boxley) - (13) - Oct. 29, 2009, 07:22:49 PM EDT

Sarah Palin's advance? -NT - (Another Scott) - (3) - Oct. 29, 2009, 07:47:30 PM EDT

I thought that was worth .0202 per word -NT - (boxley) - (2) - Oct. 29, 2009, 07:55:00 PM EDT

Me too. But I guess harpercollins disagreed. ;-) - (Another Scott) - (1) - Oct. 29, 2009, 08:08:41 PM EDT

nah, I got that, just an interesting breakdown -NT - (boxley) - Oct. 30, 2009, 08:18:22 AM EDT

Re: more words please - (lincoln) - (8) - Oct. 30, 2009, 01:57:49 PM EDT

yup and the dems voted for that one too -NT - (boxley) - (7) - Oct. 30, 2009, 02:50:05 PM EDT

It's still the Bush disaster -NT - (Silverlock) - (6) - Oct. 31, 2009, 06:40:22 AM EDT

Right. - (beepster) - (5) - Oct. 31, 2009, 06:51:04 PM EDT

be fair it took 8 years before they stopped blaming Clinton -NT - (boxley) - (4) - Oct. 31, 2009, 07:42:11 PM EDT

Not so . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (3) - Oct. 31, 2009, 07:47:21 PM EDT

they are blaming obama now clinton is off the hook -NT - (boxley) - (2) - Oct. 31, 2009, 08:55:20 PM EDT

Clinton will always be there, just as Carter is. - (Another Scott) - Oct. 31, 2009, 09:12:53 PM EDT

Over on Nick Petrele's forums . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - Oct. 31, 2009, 09:31:34 PM EDT

Duck, and cover.
115 ms