IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Details from Bloomberg.
http://www.bloomberg...&sid=a3H8.VP_CHsQ

Oct. 21 (Bloomberg) -- Executives at seven bailed-out companies including Citigroup Inc. and Bank of America Corp. will have their pay cut by an average of 50 percent after negotiations with Kenneth R. Feinberg, the U.S. special master on compensation, two people familiar with the matter said.

The cash portion of salaries for the 25 highest-paid employees will be slashed 90 percent, according to a person familiar with the plan who spoke anonymously because the details haven’t been announced. Some cash will be replaced by shares that employees will be restricted from selling immediately, the same person said. An announcement could come this week.

[...]


25 x 7 = 175 people will be affected. Feinberg's destroying the American Economy!!!!11!! :-/

USAToday has a flash graphic of executive compensation in 2007 - http://www.usatoday....eo-comp/flash.htm

E.g. Pandit at Citigroup made a $250k salary, $0 bonus, and $2.9M in stock and options awards.

They're not going to be hurting, not one bit.

HTH.

Cheers,
Scott.
New Wish I could download that
I sorted by compensation change from '06. There seems to be no correlation at all to shareholder value.

Tell me again how we're defining "top performers"? Because it seems to be we're using their current compensation to define it.
--

Drew
New FlashGot should grab it for you.
It's also available in other places, like the AFL-CIO - http://www.aflcio.or...ceou/industry.cfm

HTH.

Cheers,
Scott.
     Looks like they'll be some exec jobs opening up - (beepster) - (47)
         If he hasn't stored enough already to be liquid ... - (drook) - (1)
             when a clerk makes more ... - (beepster)
         Pay for Performance has its downside, too. -NT - (Another Scott) - (42)
             Interesting take on gov't mandated pay. - (beepster) - (41)
                 It's already in place in many areas. - (Another Scott) - (40)
                     I have no issue... - (beepster) - (39)
                         Suppose *anyone else* had fronted the money - (drook) - (38)
                             What world are... - (folkert)
                             is there a point there? - (beepster) - (36)
                                 Sounds like Circuit City? - (folkert) - (2)
                                     Not really, nobody would give CC any money at all. - (beepster) - (1)
                                         The time they... - (folkert)
                                 "Top performers"? Really? - (drook) - (19)
                                     There's no definition attached - (beepster) - (18)
                                         Saying that government money is "involved" ... - (drook) - (7)
                                             Where do you stop? - (beepster) - (6)
                                                 Difference between ownership and contracting - (crazy) - (5)
                                                     Many contractors wouldn't exist - (beepster) - (4)
                                                         Whoa - (crazy) - (3)
                                                             They don't own controlling interest - (beepster) - (2)
                                                                 Um... - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                                                     Politics vs Rules - (beepster)
                                         Details from Bloomberg. - (Another Scott) - (2)
                                             Wish I could download that - (drook) - (1)
                                                 FlashGot should grab it for you. - (Another Scott)
                                         Re: There's no definition attached - (Mycroft_Holmes_Iv) - (6)
                                             so back to gas lines? -NT - (boxley) - (4)
                                                 Actually your both wrong - (Mycroft_Holmes_Iv) - (3)
                                                     Re: Actually your both wrong - (beepster) - (2)
                                                         Chuckle - (Mycroft_Holmes_Iv) - (1)
                                                             repos that used to be democrats maybe - (boxley)
                                             that makes it all better - (beepster)
                                 That's not what's happening. - (Another Scott) - (12)
                                     I'll tell you why! - (crazy) - (11)
                                         If you choose not to see it - (beepster) - (10)
                                             I had a great response - (crazy) - (2)
                                                 To be safe, one needs to use an external editor to post. - (Another Scott)
                                                 Got that too - (Mycroft_Holmes_Iv)
                                             So THIS is where tho corner is being turned? - (mhuber) - (6)
                                                 This is pretty blatant - (beepster) - (5)
                                                     Your rose colored glasses are pretty foggy. - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                                         I don't watch them - (beepster)
                                                     No, I don't think I'm overzealous - (mhuber) - (2)
                                                         Just so I've got this straight ... - (drook) - (1)
                                                             IRLRPD. - (Another Scott)
         Dean Baker reminds us of the obvious. - (Another Scott) - (1)
             It can't be zero - (Mycroft_Holmes_Iv)

I have, if not a full ink, at least an inkling.
398 ms