No, that is *not* how it reads

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #315,563 by drook 10/13/09 11:25:07 AM 10/13/09 11:26:16 AM Reply	No, that is not how it reads Legitimate science depends on discussing all options. The only two places where I see any mention of what "should" be done are the phrases "may sound grotesque" and "violates a generally accepted principle". That sounds more like "should not". === Dammit, how did this forum show up? Can anyone tell me how to set the timestamp for "Mark Read"? -- Drew Edited by drook Oct. 13, 2009, 11:26:16 AM EDT No, that is not how it reads Legitimate science depends on discussing all options. The only two places where I see any mention of what "should" be done are the phrases "may sound grotesque" and "violates a generally accepted principle". That sounds more like "should not". -- Drew Collapse All History
Post #315,566 by mvitale 10/13/09 11:29:40 AM Reply	Re: No, that is not how it reads I think this is what you're looking for: http://iwt.mikevital...amp=1999999999999 -Mike "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin, 1759 Historical Review of Pennsylvania
Post #315,568 by drook 10/13/09 11:37:51 AM Reply	Thanks -- Drew

regulatory tsar, "Sate owns you organs" - (boxley) - (21) - Oct. 13, 2009, 10:26:04 AM EDT

WTF? - (malraux) - (7) - Oct. 13, 2009, 11:02:09 AM EDT

full context - (boxley) - (6) - Oct. 13, 2009, 11:08:59 AM EDT

The full full context. - (Another Scott) - (1) - Oct. 13, 2009, 11:22:03 AM EDT

Re: The full full context. Perfect examples - (boxley) - Oct. 13, 2009, 11:24:40 AM EDT

No, that is *not* how it reads - (drook) - (2) - Oct. 13, 2009, 11:26:16 AM EDT

Re: No, that is *not* how it reads - (mvitale) - (1) - Oct. 13, 2009, 11:29:40 AM EDT

Thanks -NT - (drook) - Oct. 13, 2009, 11:37:51 AM EDT

Uh, no. - (malraux) - Oct. 13, 2009, 11:31:57 AM EDT

Oh, BS - (crazy) - (10) - Oct. 13, 2009, 11:29:10 AM EDT

No response I see - (crazy) - Oct. 16, 2009, 10:35:57 AM EDT

Didnt know you really wanted an answer - (boxley) - (8) - Oct. 16, 2009, 10:50:14 AM EDT

Nice try - (crazy) - (7) - Oct. 16, 2009, 10:55:15 AM EDT

okay, keep him hooked up until he passes by himself - (boxley) - (6) - Oct. 16, 2009, 11:12:58 AM EDT

Hmm - (crazy) - (1) - Oct. 16, 2009, 11:53:15 AM EDT

well, some places make soup - (boxley) - Oct. 16, 2009, 04:30:55 PM EDT

Define "death" - (pwhysall) - (3) - Oct. 16, 2009, 06:54:50 PM EDT

Re: Define "death" - (boxley) - Oct. 17, 2009, 11:06:05 AM EDT

It's the killer, isn't it? - (crazy) - (1) - Oct. 17, 2009, 02:06:09 PM EDT

death is not defined by the dead, but the living - (boxley) - Oct. 17, 2009, 05:10:31 PM EDT

Sloppy even for you - (Silverlock) - (1) - Oct. 13, 2009, 09:36:01 PM EDT

eyes are going south -NT - (boxley) - Oct. 14, 2009, 08:25:49 AM EDT

Caveat emptor.
186 ms