Yes, for the courts it was strictly business.

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #315,471

by Andrew Grygus

10/11/09 7:38:54 PM

Yes, for the courts it was strictly business.

A matter of contracts and ownership - just a rather messy one. Religious politics were strictly between the congregation and the Episcopal diocese.

God was not involved - many decades ago the courts here ruled that "God has no property rights in the State of California".

Conservatives get their due. - (Andrew Grygus) - (10) - Oct. 10, 2009, 11:58:39 PM EDT

Dear Lord: - (Ashton) - Oct. 11, 2009, 12:35:54 AM EDT

You are learning - (beepster) - (6) - Oct. 11, 2009, 11:54:29 AM EDT

Yup, works - made the Wall Street Journal even. - (Andrew Grygus) - (5) - Oct. 11, 2009, 12:35:48 PM EDT

So much for that church and state thing -NT - (beepster) - (4) - Oct. 11, 2009, 02:29:41 PM EDT

Yup, a nice thought . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (3) - Oct. 11, 2009, 02:58:18 PM EDT

Doesn't seem to apply here. - (beepster) - (2) - Oct. 11, 2009, 03:36:59 PM EDT

Curious situation. - (static) - Oct. 11, 2009, 06:24:26 PM EDT

Yes, for the courts it was strictly business. - (Andrew Grygus) - Oct. 11, 2009, 07:38:54 PM EDT

Similar things have happened in VA. - (Another Scott) - Oct. 11, 2009, 06:42:09 PM EDT

I'm assuming boring technicalities - (mhuber) - Oct. 12, 2009, 10:20:14 AM EDT

iwethey.org

You just don't see sideburns like that anymore!
57 ms