IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Borrowing trouble, need advice.
Just got recalled by my old company. 1-3 month gig, "possibly" longer.
It's close. Lots of supporters there. One manager does everything possible to get me back each time my contract ends...

On the way home tonight, I received a call from a recruiter. He has a telephone interview lined up with a company in Omaha. 6-12 month contract, with possible extension. Longer contract. $3/hr less pay. Room rental (would find someone looking for a roommate - college town). Home on weekends. Would actually save gas, less mileage that daily round trips.

I can argue both sides. But I would like opinions on what you would suggest, should I get the 2nd offer.

I know, don't have an offer yet, but I'm doing my homework. Two weeks ago, when the recruited called about the Omaha position, I didn't have anything on the horizon. Now...

All suggestions appreciated.

Joe
New boils down to which one sounds like more fun
and the old bird in hand cliche, I turned down a really lucrative and possibly perm signed contract to perm for voip at cisco because the wife didnt like richmond va for a promise by a recruiter for fedex in fla that didnt pan out at all. It all worked out but still
New I know which one I'd choose.
The longer term option requires you to live away from home, with a roommate, for less money, in a new situation where you would be new guy on the block. You'd spend weekends traveling home and back.

The shorter term option requires more weekly driving, with a boss that knows you and wants you around, for a little more money. You'd be in your own bed every day.

For me, the choice would be easy. I like relative security. I would take the recall. A known situation is better, in my mind, than the unknowns of taking a job in a new town for less money.

I know it's a hard choice, though, especially considering your commute was pretty long (IIRC). Also considering the downsizing that the PO is going through, the long-term prospects there are certainly cloudy, but they're a huge organization and are going to need people with your skills even if they do continue to go through a retrenchment. Once the economy picks up in a more sustained way, they should bounce back pretty well.

Be aware that my choice is colored by what happened to my mom: she left a good paying job she grew to strongly dislike (after a new boss came in) for the chance to start over in another town on a recruiter's promise that she'd be on her way to great long-term employment after a few weeks of temp work. Needless to say, it didn't work out that way... :-(

Best of luck! HTH a little.

Cheers,
Scott.
New Agree with AS.
But then, you do have to make your choice.
New A hard offer vs a soft offer
If you actually had both offers in your hand it might be a hard decision. But right now you only have one hard offer and the other one would have to look very good and very likely before you would be better off waiting for a possible offer.

If your lucky, the Omaha company will dither around so long you will finish the other job first.

Jay
     Borrowing trouble, need advice. - (jbrabeck) - (4)
         boils down to which one sounds like more fun - (boxley)
         I know which one I'd choose. - (Another Scott)
         Agree with AS. - (folkert)
         A hard offer vs a soft offer - (jay)

Make it so.
159 ms