IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New This is interesting
Telling a Sheriff he's not allowed to enforce the law.

http://blogs.usatoda...ent-of-homel.html

Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio says he will continue his controversial "crime suppression operations" despite a Department of Homeland Security decision to strip him of authority to arrest suspected illegal immigrants based solely on their immigration status, the East Valley Tribune reports.
I will choose a path that's clear. I will choose freewill.
New sometimes they need to dwb dws and dwi isnt a crime
New Not terribly
It's more like telling him he needs probable cause to go around scooping up people in quantity in the hopes of finding someone who may conceivably be breaking a law. But what the hell, they probably weren't using the constitution for anything anyway. Just another annoying bit of folk lore that we'll all be better off without in the near future.
New Jurisdiction?
Sheriffs are not feds. Various types of cops do not generally enforce each other's laws.

One of the more amusing examples happened here in Milwaukee back in aught-five.

The Milwaukee County Sheriff's department had been patrolling the parking lot of the stadium for years. Mostly making sure the tradition of tailgating - partying (and in the Brew City, that means mostly beer) in the parking lot before the game (in which the home team is the Brewers) - goes on in a more or less safe and legal fashion. And for whatever reason, it was decided that the Milwaukee Police Department ought to do it from here on out. No big deal. Except for this little detail: Sheriff's don't give a rat's ass about city ordinances. Ain't their job. City cops do. Is their job. And it turns out that drinking in public parking lots is a violation of a city ordinance. Sensible - parking lots, roads, mostly associated with driving and drinking ought not to be part of that. But the parking lot at the stadium is a public parking lot in the City of Milwaukee, so drinking there is illegal. Which nobody had noticed, because there weren't any city cops around to make a fuss.

That ordinance got amended SO fast...

Anyway, back to the original story. The feds a while back decided to use the local police forces as somebody-else's-tab migra. Told them they could be terrorist-bustin' heroes. Because picking vegetables for cheap is pretty much the same thing as blowing up buildings. Hey, it was a simpler time back then, with simpler people running things and all they had to say was "9/11" and all the little people would just say "OK". But amazingly enough, hick sheriffs, being hick sheriffs, often act like hick sheriffs. So now the guy's being told to hand in the secret decoder ring and get back to work. And he's upset, because he likes to play terrorist-bustin' hero on the TV better than playing sheriff in real life.
New Sounds like an excellent summary to me. Even more...
There's even more going on, though.

http://www.talkingpo...ve_this_story.php

Just a classic, classic story. First, you've got show-boating, right-wing, anti-immigration Sheriff Joe Arpaio (aka "America's Toughest Sheriff"). He teams up with Maricopa County prosecutor Andrew Thomas to arrest County Supervisor Don Stapley on charges which seem pretty thin and arguably political in nature. (They tried to prosecute him last year; but those charges fell apart. And in this case a judge found they lacked probable cause for the arrest.) But Thomas had to recuse himself because he works with Stapley in the country government. And they couldn't not come up with what in layman's terms we'd normally call a real prosecutor willing to take the case. (They tried to get the prosecutor for the neighboring county to take over the case but she declined.) So they decided to import TV lawyers-cum-DC GOP power couple Joseph diGenova and Victoria Toensing as outside "special prosecutors" to take the case.

Sounds legit, right?

And if all that weren't enough, fired US Attorney Paul Charlton is defending Stapley. So he's had his own experience being on the receiving end of political corruption of the prosecutorial process.


(See the original for links.)

:-/

Cheers,
Scott.
     This is interesting - (beepster) - (4)
         sometimes they need to dwb dws and dwi isnt a crime -NT - (boxley)
         Not terribly - (hnick)
         Jurisdiction? - (mhuber) - (1)
             Sounds like an excellent summary to me. Even more... - (Another Scott)

We've got a whole bag of *tsht* with your name on it!
35 ms