photobucket, maybe?

1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #311,992 by malraux 7/29/09 9:53:48 PM Reply	photobucket, maybe? Regards, -scott Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson.
Post #312,011 by drook 7/30/09 8:30:49 AM Reply	Had Flickr for a while I stopped using them when I hit the cap on their free service. Figured if I was paying for hosting anyway, might as well host them myself. If I'm willing to pay for image hosting again, I might look into them, but I want the photos to come from the same domain as the html. When I stopped using Flickr, neither they nor Photobucket allowed that. -- Drew
Post #312,016 by malraux 7/30/09 8:43:38 AM Reply	photobucket should allow that A good number of Facebook applications were using photobucket to host their images. Regards, -scott Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson.

Are there any entry-level content caching services? - (drook) - (27) - July 29, 2009, 05:42:52 PM EDT

AMAZON Cloudfront and S3 - (folkert) - (10) - July 29, 2009, 07:32:24 PM EDT

Are those numbers per month? - (drook) - (9) - July 29, 2009, 07:50:04 PM EDT

Yikes... - (folkert) - (1) - July 29, 2009, 08:03:24 PM EDT

That's what I figured - (drook) - July 29, 2009, 08:10:29 PM EDT

Your images may be a lot larger than that - (scoenye) - (6) - July 30, 2009, 08:20:43 PM EDT

Most people don't click through to most of the pictures - (drook) - (5) - July 30, 2009, 08:28:31 PM EDT

Server-side compression? - (Steve Lowe) - (4) - July 30, 2009, 08:32:06 PM EDT

The HTML is coming from blogger.com - (drook) - (3) - July 30, 2009, 08:40:06 PM EDT

Re: The HTML is coming from blogger.com - (folkert) - (2) - July 30, 2009, 10:32:14 PM EDT

Yeah, I don't know much about compressing photos -NT - (drook) - (1) - July 30, 2009, 11:13:07 PM EDT

Better learn and quickly... - (folkert) - July 31, 2009, 06:30:48 AM EDT

Who have you looked at? - (static) - (10) - July 29, 2009, 07:36:29 PM EDT

I found that same list - (drook) - (9) - July 29, 2009, 07:52:31 PM EDT

Aye. - (static) - (8) - July 29, 2009, 09:11:33 PM EDT

And it's *NOT PORN* - (drook) - (7) - July 29, 2009, 09:50:24 PM EDT

Wow... but what about this... - (folkert) - (3) - July 29, 2009, 10:37:31 PM EDT

Already had to do two DMCA takedown notices - (drook) - (2) - July 30, 2009, 08:28:17 AM EDT

Well, I started... - (folkert) - (1) - July 30, 2009, 09:25:42 AM EDT

I've seen her - (drook) - July 30, 2009, 11:59:39 AM EDT

Obvious question... - (static) - (2) - July 29, 2009, 10:33:56 PM EDT

Great point. -NT - (folkert) - July 29, 2009, 10:37:57 PM EDT

I've asked them, waiting for a reply -NT - (drook) - July 30, 2009, 08:28:33 AM EDT

photobucket, maybe? -NT - (malraux) - (2) - July 29, 2009, 09:53:48 PM EDT

Had Flickr for a while - (drook) - (1) - July 30, 2009, 08:30:49 AM EDT

photobucket should allow that - (malraux) - July 30, 2009, 08:43:38 AM EDT

Hosting Matters? - (Another Scott) - (1) - Aug. 6, 2009, 01:00:11 AM EDT

It not the bits per second he needs... - (folkert) - Aug. 6, 2009, 07:20:51 AM EDT

When someone asks you if you're a god, you say YES!
42 ms