They didn't even try to make it look fair. The reported results are a straight line with a correlation coefficient of 0.998.
http://andrewsulliva...they-came-in.html
Cheers,
Scott.
R^2 = 0.998
They didn't even try to make it look fair. The reported results are a straight line with a correlation coefficient of 0.998.
http://andrewsulliva...they-came-in.html Cheers, Scott. |
|
Nate of 538 says "not so fast".
He constructs a scenario that gives a similar linear relationship for the Obama/McCain results. Of course, the US results were reported by time zone, not alphabetically, so it has an artificial ring to it. But his point is well taken - a high R^2 does not *automatically* prove fraud.
http://www.fivethirt...es-not-prove.html John Cole discusses some reason why the results are suspect, here: http://www.juancole....ian-election.html Cheers, Scott. |