Bankruptcy judges do this kind of stuff all the time. If Obama's proposal is so onerous then the courts will slap the proposal down.Obama's proposal is to keep it out of the judges hands, that why all the threats to make the parties accept it
I thinmk you are confused slightly
Bankruptcy judges do this kind of stuff all the time. If Obama's proposal is so onerous then the courts will slap the proposal down.Obama's proposal is to keep it out of the judges hands, that why all the threats to make the parties accept it |
|
Maybe. Maybe not.
Pch101 and CamaroKid's takes are similar to my own:
http://www.thetrutha...l#comment-1481315 HTH. Cheers, Scott. |
|
thats gotta be an lrpd
Pch101 and CamaroKid's takes are similar to my own:
well porchmonkey and roach disagree http://www.economist...story_id=13610871 The investors in these firms are easily portrayed as vultures, but many are entrusted with the savings of ordinary people, and in any case all have a legal claim that entitles them to due process. In a crisis it is easy to put politics first, but if lenders fear their rights will be abused, other firms will find it more expensive to borrow, especially if they have unionised workforces that are seen to be friendly with the government. |
|
Recall that only a few bondholders were holdouts.
http://dealbook.blog...rtner=rss&emc=rss
What began last Thursday as a collection of about 20 investment firms holding a combined $1 billion in debt has dwindled to a set of five, holding a total of about $295 million. (The group apparently lost a member, since in a filing on Tuesday, it reported holding about $300 million.) Those who are complaining about "Obama gutting the Constitution" and using similar hyperbole on this issue need to start using some qualifiers. Only a handful are still holding out. The vast majority have accepted that they won't be first in line to pick Chrysler's carcass. But, again, a judge is going to rule on this. It's not going to be imposed by Obama's fiat, so to speak. ;-) We'll see how it turns out. Cheers, Scott. |
|
whats left are the folks who did cave to the threats
"by the crazy president" remember?
|
|
Off-the-record paraphrases of their impressions.
Show me some on-the-record quotes, not spin, and then we'll talk.
Really... Cheers, Scott. |
|
sure, they just made it all up, bad repos
|
|
It doesn't sound a little over the top to you?
Another characterized Obama was "the most dangerous smooth talker on the planet- and I knew Kissinger." Really? I'm supposed to take that as being indicative of what really happened? Give me a break... Cheers, Scott. |
|
and from an Obama supporter to boot
so you dont think he is as smart or a smooth as kissinger?
|