very good point, so buying secured notes is now a bad idea

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #308,413 by boxley 5/7/09 9:36:24 PM Reply	very good point, so buying secured notes is now a bad idea since unsecured political cronies take precedent how very Zimbabwe of you
Post #308,415 by rcareaga 5/7/09 9:41:37 PM Reply	Ah, "Zimbabwe" Whatever might have suggested such a metaphor to you, young Massa Oxley? Couldn't be that...? Nah. Not Our Bill.
Post #308,421 by boxley 5/8/09 8:27:58 AM Reply	you appear to suggest that hedge funds and bond holders are the new white farmers of the west, where the government evicts them from their wealth and redistributes it to political factions more palatable to the president. That was the quote from the story "madman theory of the presidency" put forward by their supporters. I wonder if his advisers really understand the ramifications of coming across like Robert Mugabe is a politically smart thing to do.

we believe in change, change or we keel you - (boxley) - (30) - May 7, 2009, 01:39:13 PM EDT

Ok... - (folkert) - (2) - May 7, 2009, 03:32:15 PM EDT

If they got more than going c7 why did they want to go c7? - (boxley) - (1) - May 8, 2009, 08:29:17 AM EDT

Rules and Obligations rather than... - (folkert) - May 8, 2009, 07:43:42 PM EDT

correction - (lincoln) - (1) - May 7, 2009, 03:35:40 PM EDT

Don't think your correction is needed - (beepster) - May 7, 2009, 04:30:10 PM EDT

doubly shocking, of course - (rcareaga) - (3) - May 7, 2009, 08:08:11 PM EDT

very good point, so buying secured notes is now a bad idea - (boxley) - (2) - May 7, 2009, 09:36:24 PM EDT

Ah, "Zimbabwe" - (rcareaga) - (1) - May 7, 2009, 09:41:37 PM EDT

you appear to suggest that hedge funds and bond holders - (boxley) - May 8, 2009, 08:27:58 AM EDT

Yawn. - (Another Scott) - (4) - May 7, 2009, 10:11:29 PM EDT

How utterly predictable. -NT - (beepster) - (3) - May 7, 2009, 10:24:05 PM EDT

Wouldn't want to disappoint. -NT - (Another Scott) - (2) - May 7, 2009, 10:32:28 PM EDT

;-) -NT - (beepster) - (1) - May 7, 2009, 11:02:51 PM EDT

;-) -NT - (Another Scott) - May 7, 2009, 11:28:21 PM EDT

Right - (jay) - (14) - May 8, 2009, 02:42:20 PM EDT

WTF you mean bypass the law - (boxley) - (13) - May 8, 2009, 03:34:11 PM EDT

The law is hardly ever simple. - (Another Scott) - (11) - May 8, 2009, 03:53:39 PM EDT

you are looking at 11 I am refering to 7 -NT - (boxley) - (10) - May 9, 2009, 12:02:36 PM EDT

Either way, the secured bondholders wouldn't get 65% - (Another Scott) - (9) - May 9, 2009, 12:35:10 PM EDT

I thinmk you are confused slightly - (boxley) - (8) - May 10, 2009, 11:15:13 AM EDT

Maybe. Maybe not. - (Another Scott) - (7) - May 10, 2009, 12:54:24 PM EDT

thats gotta be an lrpd - (boxley) - (6) - May 11, 2009, 07:23:25 AM EDT

Recall that only a few bondholders were holdouts. - (Another Scott) - (5) - May 11, 2009, 07:59:17 AM EDT

whats left are the folks who did cave to the threats - (boxley) - (4) - May 11, 2009, 09:43:23 AM EDT

Off-the-record paraphrases of their impressions. - (Another Scott) - (3) - May 11, 2009, 09:55:47 AM EDT

sure, they just made it all up, bad repos -NT - (boxley) - (2) - May 11, 2009, 10:09:19 AM EDT

It doesn't sound a little over the top to you? - (Another Scott) - (1) - May 11, 2009, 10:14:37 AM EDT

and from an Obama supporter to boot - (boxley) - May 11, 2009, 03:49:43 PM EDT

Legal manuvering - (jay) - May 10, 2009, 03:36:28 AM EDT

Jane at FDL has more... - (Another Scott) - May 24, 2009, 09:25:46 PM EDT

[C:\]_
87 ms