IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Missouri Compromise
Was that the agreement that blacks/slaves would be counted as a 3/5 person for population for congressional seats being assigned?

Nope...wrong one...here

[link|http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/aia/part3/3h511.html|Missouri Compromise]


The 1819 application for statehood by the Missouri Territory sparked a bitter debate in Congress over the issue of slavery in the new territories that had been created as a result of the Louisiana Purchase of 1803. Concerned that the South would have a representational advantage, Congressman James Tallmadge of New York introduced an amendment that would prohibit any further growth of slavery in Missouri, and would eventually set the children of Missouri's slaves free.

Despite "the difficulties and the dangers of having free blacks intermingling with slaves," Tallmadge declared, "I know the will of my constituents, and regardless of consequences, I will avow it; as their representative, I will proclaim their hatred to slavery in every shape." The bill passed in the House but failed to pass the Senate.

The issue was resolved with a two-part compromise. The northern part of Massachusetts became Maine and was admitted to the Union as a free state at the same time that Missouri was admitted as a slave state, thereby maintaining a balance of 12 slave and 12 free states.

In addition, an imaginary line was drawn at 36 degrees 30 minutes north latitude, and any portions of the Louisiana Territory lying north of the compromise line would be free; however, the act provided that fugitive slaves "escaping into any... state or territory of the United States...may be lawfully reclaimed and conveyed to the person claiming his or her labour or service" -- and even in the free territories, "slavery and involuntary servitude ... in the punishment of crimes" was not prohibited.
Jay O'Connor

"Going places unmapped
to do things unplanned
to people unsuspecting"
New Thanks for the info NT

"I can see if I want anything done right around here, I'll have to do it myself!"  Moe Howard

New Ah yes - our gift for bafflegab, in self-service was never
larger than at the first. The spirit of er daleross (was it? Full-time M$ shill) Lived! Its Spirit:

If it's [now] legal, it's ethical..

Its Cathedral: the ABA. It's patrons - us.











..thine alabaster cities gleam, undimmed by human tears

'Murica the Booty-ful' \ufffd
New Was that last bit the trigger?
I heard at one point that that North was mostly willing (at least in the sense of not getting up the energy to do anything about it) to let the South keep slaves, until the South managed to get the Feds to force Northerners to hunt down escaped slaves.

This interpretation (and I'm not qualified to judge its validity) makes the situation all the more ironic - the Union got involved because the Rebels (not Confederate yet, IIRC) were trampling on state's rights.
White guys in suits know best
- Pat McCurdy
     Don't ya hate it... - (static) - (18)
         ...when you read posts like that *before* lunch? -NT - (CRConrad) - (1)
             ROFL! - (static)
         ??? - (addison) - (9)
             "Mr Hanky", one of the heroes of "South Park", of course - (CRConrad) - (7)
                 Who? - (addison) - (6)
                     Oh well, youknowwhatImeant. Now shaddap and play your banjo! -NT - (CRConrad)
                     Missourah is deep in the middle - (orion) - (4)
                         Missouri Compromise - (Fearless Freep) - (3)
                             Thanks for the info NT -NT - (orion)
                             Ah yes - our gift for bafflegab, in self-service was never - (Ashton)
                             Was that last bit the trigger? - (mhuber)
             I was making conversation. More or less. - (static)
         I don't understand either way. - (wharris2) - (3)
             ya mean just lay an oyster on the wall? - (boxley) - (1)
                 On the wall or whereever - (wharris2)
             That creates another problem. - (static)
         Was this during a job interview? -NT - (tablizer) - (1)
             Fortunately, no. :-) -NT - (static)

Clearly you have a security problem - and it's got nothing to do with computers.
358 ms