T-minus 10.

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #302,183 by mvitale 1/10/09 6:38:06 PM Reply	T-minus 10. -Mike "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin, 1759 Historical Review of Pennsylvania
Post #302,185 by Another Scott 1/10/09 7:02:36 PM Reply	Heh. :-)
Post #302,199 by mvitale 1/11/09 9:14:38 AM Reply	9... -Mike "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin, 1759 Historical Review of Pennsylvania
Post #302,206 by folkert 1/11/09 4:53:19 PM Reply	Look at the flurry of activity for last minute thingers.
Post #302,238 by mvitale 1/12/09 7:48:18 AM Reply	8... -Mike "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin, 1759 Historical Review of Pennsylvania
Post #302,246 by folkert 1/12/09 9:48:24 AM Reply	W == BLAH BLAH BLAH Greatest Presidency ever... blah blah bleah... LIAR LIAR PANTS ON FIRE!
Post #302,277 by mvitale 1/13/09 8:40:21 AM Reply	7... -Mike "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin, 1759 Historical Review of Pennsylvania
Post #302,303 by Ashton 1/13/09 5:06:42 PM Reply	And Too LATE: to declare marital er, Martial Law! The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary. -- H.L. Mencken
Post #302,311 by folkert 1/13/09 8:17:25 PM Reply	Not really.
Post #302,324 by drook 1/14/09 12:06:16 AM Reply	6... -- Drew
Post #302,355 by mvitale 1/14/09 12:23:21 PM Reply	That's one way to beat me to updating it... ...Post your own update before it's even the "next day" here. -Mike "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin, 1759 Historical Review of Pennsylvania
Post #302,360 by drook 1/14/09 1:27:49 PM Reply	The inauguration is held in EST :-P -- Drew
Post #302,424 by mvitale 1/15/09 6:01:15 AM Reply	5... -Mike "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin, 1759 Historical Review of Pennsylvania
Post #302,445 by Ashton 1/15/09 3:43:35 PM Reply	.'_ Easy Pieces' ?? The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary. -- H.L. Mencken
Post #302,465 by drook 1/16/09 12:16:42 AM Reply	4... -- Drew
Post #302,466 by malraux 1/16/09 12:20:42 AM Reply	Anyone else watch the "End Of An Error" address tonight? It was fun, in a MST3K sort of way. Regards, -scott Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson.
Post #302,473 by folkert 1/16/09 7:27:35 AM Reply	easy steps to an Economic recovery. Wait 4 days and "refresh"
Post #302,528 by drook 1/17/09 12:10:03 AM Reply	3... -- Drew
Post #302,571 by drook 1/18/09 12:04:44 AM Reply	2 !!! -- Drew
Post #302,618 by mvitale 1/19/09 12:25:17 AM Reply	T-minus 1! -Mike "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin, 1759 Historical Review of Pennsylvania
Post #302,657 by mvitale 1/20/09 12:38:07 AM Reply	Ring, ring! Hello, Georgie? Yeah, it's Crawford callin'. Y'all c'mon back to the village, pardner. -Mike "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin, 1759 Historical Review of Pennsylvania
Post #302,660 by drook 1/20/09 5:36:53 AM Reply	Not likely Now that he doesn't need to pretend to be a cowboy for the press any more, he can sell the ranch and take a couple of months to decompress at Kennebunkport. -- Drew
Post #302,670 by a6l6e6x 1/20/09 9:55:13 AM Reply	Laura bought a house in Houston. Alex
Post #302,673 by Another Scott 1/20/09 10:00:27 AM Reply	Really? I thought they were looking in Dallas. Houston would make more sense in some respects, as that's Pappy's base. Cheers, Scott.
Post #302,679 by a6l6e6x 1/20/09 10:11:07 AM Reply	You're right! I stand corrected. Alex
Post #302,658 by pwhysall 1/20/09 1:11:23 AM Reply	Well, thank fÃ¼ck for that. I was beginning to feel as though Gee Dub was The New American Way. Now, all Obama has to do is not fuck it up. And all we have to do, this side of the water, is not fuck it up, too. If we re-elect Gee Bee again next year, we deserve the arse-raping that will so surely follow. That said, you'd have to be a brave gambler to back Labour next time out.
Post #302,659 by Ashton 1/20/09 2:00:17 AM Reply	Tom Tomorrow sums up the Farewell.. in his inimitable way (since - - words fail.) http://www.salon.com...source=newsletter
Post #302,672 by a6l6e6x 1/20/09 9:59:15 AM Reply	Hey, that's my hiking boot at the top! Alex
Post #302,761 by mhuber 1/20/09 10:53:03 PM Reply	Too bad he neglected to include a moving box. Not enough time, I guess. But why is an important guy, or an old guy, moving his own boxes anyway? I sure wouldn't.
Post #302,762 by boxley 1/20/09 10:55:30 PM Reply	more important did he use more trucks to move out than to move in? Inquiring minds need to know :-)
Post #302,685 by folkert 1/20/09 11:52:45 AM Reply	T-minus 7 minutes.
Post #302,688 by folkert 1/20/09 12:03:12 PM Reply	3+ minutes ago he became President
Post #302,690 by Andrew Grygus 1/20/09 12:05:51 PM Reply	Sentient LRPD, "He's a big man"
Post #302,686 by hnick 1/20/09 12:00:33 PM Reply	End of an error
Post #302,693 by Andrew Grygus 1/20/09 12:08:19 PM Reply	And there's a popular prophet I read about . . . . . who needs to come up with a reason why "It looked like he was inaugurated but he wasn't really - it was all just a show - like the landing on the moon".
Post #302,696 by malraux 1/20/09 12:28:06 PM Reply	Easy... he bobbled the oath. Regards, -scott Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson.
Post #302,702 by folkert 1/20/09 12:54:06 PM Reply	The Chief justice bobbled it.
Post #302,738 by Ashton 1/20/09 6:28:51 PM Reply	He became Pres. at noon, per Constitution; oath or no oath. Can't recall the Pres who took his: over a Legal Code.. wayback when they recognized separation-of etc. etc.
Post #302,739 by Another Scott 1/20/09 6:34:59 PM Reply	Yup. http://www.law.umkc....ationconstit.html The 20th Amendment moves the date of inauguration from March to "noon on the 20th day of January." Under the Constitution, the old president continues to hold full power through 11:59:59, and then power shifts at noon. Article II, Section 1 requires that the new president, before executing any duties, take a prescribed oath or affirmation. To avoid a constitutional power vacuum, the Inauguration Day program is certain to schedule the swearing in for as close as possible to noon. The Chief Justice of the United States typically administers the oath, although the Constitution does not require that the oath be performed by the Chief Justice Cheers, Scott. (It won't keep the wingnuts from caterwauling about it, though.)
Post #302,742 by folkert 1/20/09 7:03:48 PM Reply	Re: He became Pres. at noon, per Constitution; oath or no oa Its why I typed 3+ minutes ago when I typed it.
Post #302,819 by Ashton 1/21/09 5:54:58 PM Reply	True, noted. But wingnuts are not reality-based (AJG's post)
Post #302,692 by folkert 1/20/09 12:06:23 PM Reply	The DEED IS DONE!
Post #302,695 by pwhysall 1/20/09 12:14:16 PM Reply	How pleasing. You now appear to have a President who has English as a first language. {listening to speech live on BBC web wossname}
Post #302,697 by malraux 1/20/09 12:29:18 PM Reply	Re: How pleasing. Same here, best coverage. MSNBC had the best streaming of the domestics, but the announcers were frakking idiots. George H. comes tottering out, and one of the idiots says "heh, that's why old people go South for the winter." Moron. Regards, -scott Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson.
Post #302,698 by malraux 1/20/09 12:30:43 PM Reply	Great speech. Time to execute now, though. Oh, and Chimp? Cheney? Don't let the door hit you where the good Lord split you, ok? Regards, -scott Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson.
Post #302,699 by mvitale 1/20/09 12:32:58 PM Reply	Indeed. Conduct business in the light. What a novel concept. Let's hold 'em all accountable for those promises. -Mike "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin, 1759 Historical Review of Pennsylvania
Post #302,705 by beepster 1/20/09 12:55:45 PM Reply	That part we've known... he's a great speaker. Let's see if he can get it done. I will choose a path that's clear. I will choose freewill.
Post #302,731 by a6l6e6x 1/20/09 4:52:16 PM Reply	You must not have been watching Fox. They said there was nothing memorable in it. Who are you going to believe the lefty MSNBC or the no-spin Fox? Unfortunately, my campsite has a great tree blocking a good shot at Tampa/St. Pete, the closest metro area, and the best digital signal is Fox with NBC a poor second. And you know how annoying a broken digital signal is. The BHO speech brought tears to my eyes! Alex
Post #302,734 by malraux 1/20/09 5:10:46 PM Reply	Actually I watched it on the BBC Live Feed. :-) And I didn't listen to the commentary. Regards, -scott Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson.
Post #302,741 by folkert 1/20/09 7:03:09 PM Reply	CNN-HD had a very good doing of the speech Nearly ZERO comments. I mean nearly zero. And the couple I remember were on the order of "Cool" And Frickin' Glenn Beck (now on Fox) can KISS MY WHITE RACIST ASS.
Post #302,743 by a6l6e6x 1/20/09 7:40:39 PM Reply	Fox was actually quiet during the inaugural speech itself. But, they over-talked during the poetry reading. Inconsiderate bastards! Alex
Post #302,818 by Ashton 1/21/09 5:47:23 PM Reply	There are ~no Right-wacko poets/listeners. Figures re Fox..
Post #302,703 by beepster 1/20/09 12:54:06 PM Reply	Its now official. Now we get to blame him for everything! I will choose a path that's clear. I will choose freewill.
Post #302,711 by boxley 1/20/09 1:15:21 PM Reply	now beep, thats no way to act gotta save some room for pelosi and reid :-)
Post #302,722 by malraux 1/20/09 3:34:01 PM Reply	They're the ones with the real power to muck this up Regards, -scott Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson.

T-minus 10. -NT - (mvitale) - (54) - Jan. 10, 2009, 06:38:06 PM EST

Heh. :-) -NT - (Another Scott) - Jan. 10, 2009, 07:02:36 PM EST

9... -NT - (mvitale) - (1) - Jan. 11, 2009, 09:14:38 AM EST

Look at the flurry of activity for last minute thingers. -NT - (folkert) - Jan. 11, 2009, 04:53:19 PM EST

8... -NT - (mvitale) - (1) - Jan. 12, 2009, 07:48:18 AM EST

W == BLAH BLAH BLAH Greatest Presidency ever... blah blah - (folkert) - Jan. 12, 2009, 09:48:24 AM EST

7... -NT - (mvitale) - (2) - Jan. 13, 2009, 08:40:21 AM EST

And Too LATE: to declare marital er, Martial Law! -NT - (Ashton) - (1) - Jan. 13, 2009, 05:06:42 PM EST

Not really. -NT - (folkert) - Jan. 13, 2009, 08:17:25 PM EST

6... -NT - (drook) - (2) - Jan. 14, 2009, 12:06:16 AM EST

That's one way to beat me to updating it... - (mvitale) - (1) - Jan. 14, 2009, 12:23:21 PM EST

The inauguration is held in EST :-P -NT - (drook) - Jan. 14, 2009, 01:27:49 PM EST

5... -NT - (mvitale) - (1) - Jan. 15, 2009, 06:01:15 AM EST

.'_ Easy Pieces' ?? -NT - (Ashton) - Jan. 15, 2009, 03:43:35 PM EST

4... -NT - (drook) - (2) - Jan. 16, 2009, 12:16:42 AM EST

Anyone else watch the "End Of An Error" address tonight? - (malraux) - Jan. 16, 2009, 12:20:42 AM EST

easy steps to - (folkert) - Jan. 16, 2009, 07:27:35 AM EST

3... -NT - (drook) - Jan. 17, 2009, 12:10:03 AM EST

2 !!! -NT - (drook) - Jan. 18, 2009, 12:04:44 AM EST

T-minus 1! -NT - (mvitale) - Jan. 19, 2009, 12:25:17 AM EST

Ring, ring! - (mvitale) - (4) - Jan. 20, 2009, 12:38:07 AM EST

Not likely - (drook) - (3) - Jan. 20, 2009, 05:36:53 AM EST

Laura bought a house in Houston. -NT - (a6l6e6x) - (2) - Jan. 20, 2009, 09:55:13 AM EST

Really? I thought they were looking in Dallas. - (Another Scott) - (1) - Jan. 20, 2009, 10:00:27 AM EST

You're right! I stand corrected. -NT - (a6l6e6x) - Jan. 20, 2009, 10:11:07 AM EST

Well, thank fÃ¼ck for that. - (pwhysall) - Jan. 20, 2009, 01:11:23 AM EST

Tom Tomorrow sums up the Farewell.. - (Ashton) - (3) - Jan. 20, 2009, 02:00:17 AM EST

Hey, that's my hiking boot at the top! -NT - (a6l6e6x) - Jan. 20, 2009, 09:59:15 AM EST

Too bad he neglected - (mhuber) - (1) - Jan. 20, 2009, 10:53:03 PM EST

more important - (boxley) - Jan. 20, 2009, 10:55:30 PM EST

T-minus 7 minutes. -NT - (folkert) - (2) - Jan. 20, 2009, 11:52:45 AM EST

3+ minutes ago he became President -NT - (folkert) - (1) - Jan. 20, 2009, 12:03:12 PM EST

Sentient LRPD, "He's a big man" -NT - (Andrew Grygus) - Jan. 20, 2009, 12:05:51 PM EST

End of an error -NT - (hnick) - (7) - Jan. 20, 2009, 12:00:33 PM EST

And there's a popular prophet I read about . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (6) - Jan. 20, 2009, 12:08:19 PM EST

Easy... he bobbled the oath. -NT - (malraux) - (1) - Jan. 20, 2009, 12:28:06 PM EST

The Chief justice bobbled it. -NT - (folkert) - Jan. 20, 2009, 12:54:06 PM EST

He became Pres. at noon, per Constitution; oath or no oath. - (Ashton) - (3) - Jan. 20, 2009, 06:28:51 PM EST

Yup. - (Another Scott) - Jan. 20, 2009, 06:34:59 PM EST

Re: He became Pres. at noon, per Constitution; oath or no oa - (folkert) - (1) - Jan. 20, 2009, 07:03:48 PM EST

True, noted. But wingnuts are not reality-based (AJG's post) -NT - (Ashton) - Jan. 21, 2009, 05:54:58 PM EST

The DEED IS DONE! -NT - (folkert) - Jan. 20, 2009, 12:06:23 PM EST

How pleasing. - (pwhysall) - (1) - Jan. 20, 2009, 12:14:16 PM EST

Re: How pleasing. - (malraux) - Jan. 20, 2009, 12:29:18 PM EST

Great speech. - (malraux) - (7) - Jan. 20, 2009, 12:30:43 PM EST

Indeed. - (mvitale) - Jan. 20, 2009, 12:32:58 PM EST

That part we've known... - (beepster) - Jan. 20, 2009, 12:55:45 PM EST

You must not have been watching Fox. - (a6l6e6x) - (4) - Jan. 20, 2009, 04:52:16 PM EST

Actually I watched it on the BBC Live Feed. :-) - (malraux) - (3) - Jan. 20, 2009, 05:10:46 PM EST

CNN-HD had a very good doing of the speech - (folkert) - (2) - Jan. 20, 2009, 07:03:09 PM EST

Fox was actually quiet during the inaugural speech itself. - (a6l6e6x) - (1) - Jan. 20, 2009, 07:40:39 PM EST

There are ~no Right-wacko poets/listeners. Figures re Fox.. -NT - (Ashton) - Jan. 21, 2009, 05:47:23 PM EST

Its now official. - (beepster) - (2) - Jan. 20, 2009, 12:54:06 PM EST

now beep, thats no way to act - (boxley) - (1) - Jan. 20, 2009, 01:15:21 PM EST

They're the ones with the real power to muck this up -NT - (malraux) - Jan. 20, 2009, 03:34:01 PM EST

iwethey.org

Ruh-roh...
147 ms